Extraneural versus Intraneural Stimulation Thresholds during Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block

Background:A stimulation current of no more than 0.5mA is regarded as safe in avoiding nerve injury and delivering adequate stimulus to provoke a motor response. However, there is no consistent level of stimulating threshold that reliably indicates intraneural placement of the needle. The authors determined the minimally required stimulation threshold to elicit a motor response outside and inside the most superficial part of the brachial plexus during high-resolution, ultrasound-guided, supraclavicular block. Methods:After institutional review board approval, ultrasound-guided, supraclavicular block was performed on 55 patients. Patients with neurologic dysfunction were excluded. Criteria for extraneural and intraneural stimulation were defined and assessed by independent experts. To determine success rate and any residual neurologic deficit, qualitative sensory and motor examinations were performed before and after block placement. At 6 month follow-up, the patients were examined for any neurologic deficit. Results:Thirty-nine patients met all set stimulation criteria. Median ± SD (interquartile range) minimum stimulation threshold outside was 0.60 ± 0.37 mA (0.40, 1.0) and inside 0.30 ± 0.19 mA (0.20, 0.40). The difference of 0.30 mA was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Stimulation currents of 0.2 mA or less were not observed outside the trunk in any patient. Significantly higher thresholds were observed in diabetic patients. Success rate was 100% after 20 min. Thirty-four patients had normal sensory and motor examination at 6 months. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Conclusion:Within the limitations of this study and the use of ultrasound, a stimulation current of 0.2 mA or less is reliable to detect intraneural placement of the needle. Furthermore, stimulation currents of more than 0.2 and no more than 0.5 mA could not rule out intraneural position.

[1]  C. McCartney,et al.  Ultrasound detects intraneural injection. , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[2]  J. Szerb,et al.  Long current impulses may be required for nerve stimulation in patients with ischemic pain , 2005, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[3]  V. Chan,et al.  Brachial Plexus Examination and Localization Using Ultrasound and Electrical Stimulation: A Volunteer Study , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[4]  T. Wickiewicz,et al.  Inability to Consistently Elicit a Motor Response Following Sensory Paresthesia During Interscalene Block Administration , 1998, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[5]  A. Hadžić,et al.  Electrical Nerve Localization: Effects of Cutaneous Electrode Placement and Duration of the Stimulus on Motor Response , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[6]  Thomas Grau,et al.  Ultrasound Characteristics of Needles for Regional Anesthesia , 2007, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[7]  M. Beach,et al.  Use of a nerve stimulator does not improve the efficacy of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve blocks. , 2006, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[8]  A. Stubhaug,et al.  Ultrasound controlled nerve stimulation in the elbow region: high currents and short distances needed to obtain motor responses , 2007, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  A. Gaur,et al.  Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block , 2010 .

[10]  A. Hadžić,et al.  Combination of intraneural injection and high injection pressure leads to fascicular injury and neurologic deficits in dogs , 2004, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[11]  R. Rosenquist,et al.  Regional Anesthesia in the Anticoagulated Patient: Defining the Risks (The Second ASRA Consensus Conference on Neuraxial Anesthesia and Anticoagulation) , 2003, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[12]  J. de Andrés,et al.  Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in the Practice of Brachial Plexus Anesthesia: A Review , 2001, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[13]  Q. Hogan Finding Nerves Is Not Simple , 2003, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[14]  R. Dinapoli,et al.  Recurring brachial plexus neuropathy in a diabetic patient after shoulder surgery and continuous interscalene block. , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[15]  D. Kline,et al.  Peripheral nerve injection injury: an experimental study. , 1979, Neurosurgery.

[16]  B. Sites,et al.  Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Block Demonstrates an Atypical Motor Response to Nerve Stimulation in 2 Patients With Diabetes Mellitus , 2003, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[17]  A. Hadžić,et al.  Intensity of the Stimulating Current May Not Be a Reliable Indicator of Intraneural Needle Placement , 2007, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[18]  Z. Koscielniak-Nielsen,et al.  Ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve blocks: What are the benefits? , 2008, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  C. Greim,et al.  Ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia: differences in success between patients of normal and excessive weight. , 2006, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[20]  G. Sennwald Fasciectomy for treatment of Dupuytren's disease and early complications. , 1990, The Journal of hand surgery.

[21]  D. Q. Tran,et al.  Use of Radiographic Contrast to Confirm the Placement of a Sciatic Catheter in a Patient Presenting an Atypical Response to Neurostimulation , 2006, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[22]  J. Sjöstrand,et al.  Longitudinal Spread of Intraneurally Injected Local Anesthetics: An Experimental Study of the Initial Neural Distribution Following Intraneural Injections , 1978, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[23]  P. Shannon,et al.  An Ultrasonographic and Histological Study of Intraneural Injection and Electrical Stimulation in Pigs , 2007, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[24]  M. Curatolo,et al.  Ultrasound-guided blocks of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve: accuracy of a selective new technique confirmed by anatomical dissection. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  Anahi Perlas,et al.  The Sensitivity of Motor Response to Nerve Stimulation and Paresthesia for Nerve Localization As Evaluated by Ultrasound , 2006, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[26]  E Mervaala,et al.  Natural history of peripheral neuropathy in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  R. Pietrobon,et al.  Influence of Obesity on Surgical Regional Anesthesia in the Ambulatory Setting: An Analysis of 9,038 Blocks , 2005, Anesthesiology.

[28]  D. Kline,et al.  Early changes following injection injury of peripheral nerves. , 1980, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[29]  A. Adler,et al.  Risk Factors for Diabetic Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy: Results of the Seattle Prospective Diabetic Foot Study , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[30]  C. McCartney,et al.  What Is the Relationship Between Paresthesia and Nerve Stimulation for Axillary Brachial Plexus Block? , 2000, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[31]  Samuel K. Miller,et al.  Complications and their management , 2003 .

[32]  A. Gray,et al.  Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Modified Plumb-Bob Technique , 2006, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[33]  H. Renck Neurological complications of central nerve blocks , 1995, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[34]  G. Groen,et al.  Quantitative Architecture of the Brachial Plexus and Surrounding Compartments, and Their Possible Significance for Plexus Blocks , 2008, Anesthesiology.

[35]  P. Bigeleisen Nerve Puncture and Apparent Intraneural Injection during Ultrasound-guided Axillary Block Does Not Invariably Result in Neurologic Injury , 2006, Anesthesiology.

[36]  S. Mackinnon,et al.  Injection injury to the median nerve. , 1996, Annals of plastic surgery.

[37]  A. Borgeat,et al.  Nerve injury and regional anaesthesia , 2004, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[38]  A. Hadžić Peripheral Nerve Stimulators: Cracking the Code—One at a Time , 2003, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[39]  J. de Andrés,et al.  Nerve stimulation in regional anesthesia: theory and practice. , 2005, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[40]  A. T. Kerr The brachial plexus of nerves in man, the variations in its formation and branches , 1918 .