The Use of Orthopedic Surgical Devices for Forensic Identification *

Abstract:  Surgically implanted devices have become increasingly common in modern skeletal material. Therefore, having the knowledge of the variety of implanted orthopedic devices, their manufacturer, and where to find and how to use identifying numbers in such implants can assist in the identification process when traditional methods are not applicable. Orthopedic device manufacturers are required by the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 and the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 to track permanently implanted devices. Manufacturer information on orthopedic devices associates the orthopedic surgeon who implanted the device with the patient. By providing a current list of the most common orthopedic device manufacturers in the U.S.A. and the associated contact information, investigators will have updated tools for the individuation process. Despite numerous complicating factors regarding how device data are tracked, the information presented here can assist forensic professionals with obtaining presumptive and/or positive identifications.

[1]  Amy Z. Mundorff,et al.  Marrying Anthropology and DNA: Essential for Solving Complex Commingling Problems in Cases of Extreme Fragmentation , 2008 .

[2]  Ellie Simpson,et al.  Role of Orthopedic Implants and Bone Morphology in the Identification of Human Remains , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  T. Hunter,et al.  Overview of medical devices. , 2001, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[4]  T. Hunter,et al.  Gallery of medical devices: part 1: orthopedic devices for the extremities and pelvis. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  Sue Black,et al.  Forensic human identification:an introduction , 2006 .

[6]  Jane E. Buikstra,et al.  Forensic Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[7]  D. C. Benedix,et al.  Positive identification of cremains recovered from an automobile based on presence of an internal fixation device. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  Tim B Hunter,et al.  Joint arthroplasties and prostheses. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  C. G. Child,et al.  Surgical Intervention , 2017 .

[10]  S. Hoermann,et al.  The national ambulatory medical care survey. , 1973, Medical care.

[11]  J. Rose,et al.  The analysis of cremains: A case study involving the inappropriate disposal of mortuary remains. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  Douglas H. Ubelaker,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF ORTHOPEDIC DEVICE MANUFACTURER , 1995 .

[13]  D. Steadman.  Hard Evidence: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology , 2002 .

[14]  E. Bartelink,et al.  DNA Preservation in Skeletal Elements from the World Trade Center Disaster: Recommendations for Mass Fatality Management *,† , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  K. A. Cullen,et al.  National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2005 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. , 2007, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[16]  S. Furner,et al.  Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States , 1992 .

[17]  Giovanna M. Vidoli,et al.  Anthropological and Radiographic Comparison of Vertebrae for Identification of Decomposed Human Remains , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.