Teledermatology: Comparison of Store-and-Forward Versus Live Interactive Video Conferencing

A decreasing number of dermatologists and an increasing number of patients in Western countries have led to a relative lack of clinicians providing expert dermatologic care. This, in turn, has prolonged wait times for patients to be examined, putting them at risk. Store-and-forward teledermatology improves patient access to dermatologists through asynchronous consultations, reducing wait times to obtain a consultation. However, live video conferencing as a synchronous service is also frequently used by practitioners because it allows immediate interaction between patient and physician. This raises the question of which of the two approaches is superior in terms of quality of care and convenience. There are pros and cons for each in terms of technical requirements and features. This viewpoint compares the two techniques based on a literature review and a clinical perspective to help dermatologists assess the value of teledermatology and determine which techniques would be valuable in their practice.

[1]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Mobile teledermatology for skin tumour screening: diagnostic accuracy of clinical and dermoscopic image tele‐evaluation using cellular phones , 2011, The British journal of dermatology.

[2]  M. Augustin,et al.  Telemedicine in dermatology: findings and experiences worldwide – a systematic literature review , 2018, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[3]  Laurie A. Theeke,et al.  The use of teledermoscopy in the accurate identification of cancerous skin lesions in the adult population: A systematic review , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[4]  A. Enk,et al.  Praxis der Teledermatologie , 2018, Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG.

[5]  M. Kashani-Sabet,et al.  Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma at a melanoma referral center. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[6]  G. Fabbrocini,et al.  Teledermatology: From Prevention to Diagnosis of Nonmelanoma and Melanoma Skin Cancer , 2011, International journal of telemedicine and applications.

[7]  John Paoli,et al.  Smartphone teledermoscopy referrals: a novel process for improved triage of skin cancer patients. , 2015, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[8]  Kathy Dallest,et al.  Teledermatology for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review , 2017, JAMA dermatology.

[9]  N. Shaw,et al.  Patient satisfaction with teledermatology is related to perceived quality of life , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[10]  D. Eedy,et al.  A comparison of real‐time and store‐and‐forward teledermatology: a cost–benefit study , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[11]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Concordance and time estimation of store-and-forward mobile teledermatology compared to classical face-to-face consultation. , 2015, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[12]  P. Buettner,et al.  Agreement between histological diagnosis of skin lesions by histopathologists and a dermato‐histopathologist , 2009, International journal of dermatology.

[13]  J. Kvedar,et al.  Teledermatology: from historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: part I: History, rationale, and current practice. , 2015, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[14]  N. D. de Keizer,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of teledermatoscopy with images taken by general practitioners during everyday practice , 2013, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

[15]  R. Maisiak,et al.  Comparing High Definition Live Interactive and Store-and-Forward Consultations to In-Person Examinations. , 2017, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[16]  P. Rubegni,et al.  Teledermatology: state-of-the-art and future perspectives , 2012 .

[17]  R. Wootton,et al.  Community photo‐triage for skin cancer referrals: an aid to service delivery , 2011, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[18]  J. Whited,et al.  Teledermatology. Current status and future directions. , 2001, American journal of clinical dermatology.

[19]  E. Şenel,et al.  A preliminary study of the contribution of telemicroscopy to the diagnosis and management of skin tumours in teledermatology , 2014, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[20]  E. Hook,et al.  Delayed Presentation to Clinics for Sexually Transmitted Diseases by Symptomatic Patients: A Potential Contributor to Continuing STD Morbidity , 1997, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[21]  H. Soyer,et al.  Consumer acceptance of patient‐performed mobile teledermoscopy for the early detection of melanoma , 2016, The British journal of dermatology.

[22]  I Zalaudek,et al.  Meta‐analysis of digital dermoscopy follow‐up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society , 2013, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[23]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Teledermatology for diagnosis and management of skin conditions: a systematic review. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[24]  Benjamin Stoff,et al.  Discordance of histopathologic parameters in cutaneous melanoma: Clinical implications. , 2016, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.