This paper assesses and compares the performances of two daylight collection strategies, one passive and one active, for large-scale mirrored light pipes (MLP) illuminating deep plan buildings. Both strategies use laser cut panels (LCP) as the main component of the collection system. The passive system comprises LCPs in pyramid form, whereas the active system uses a tiled LCP on a simple rotation mechanism that rotates 360° in 24 hours. Performance is assessed using scale model testing under sunny sky conditions and mathematical modelling. Results show average illuminance levels for the pyramid LCP ranging from 50 to 250 lux and 150 to 200 lux for the rotating LCPs. Both systems improve the performance of a MLP. The pyramid LCP increases the performance of a MLP by 2.5 times and the rotating LCP by 5 times, when compared to an open pipe particularly for low sun elevation angles.
[1]
I. R. Edmonds,et al.
Extractors and emitters for light distribution from hollow light guides
,
1997
.
[2]
I. Edmonds,et al.
Daylighting with angular-selective skylights: Predicted performance
,
1996
.
[3]
I. R. Edmonds,et al.
Daylighting enhancement with light pipes coupled to laser-cut light-deflecting panels
,
1995
.
[4]
Michael Wilson,et al.
Light piping performance enhancement using a deflecting sheet
,
2006
.
[5]
Veronica Garcia Hansen,et al.
NATURAL ILLUMINATION OF DEEP-PLAN OFFICE BUILDINGS: LIGHT PIPE STRATEGIES
,
2003
.
[6]
Michael Travers,et al.
Daylighting via hollow mirror light guides
,
1998
.
[7]
I. Edmonds.
Performance of laser cut light deflecting panels in daylighting applications
,
1993
.