Analyzing Teachers’ Professional Interactions in a School as Social Capital: A Social Network Approach

Background/Context Researchers have proposed a number of lenses for analyzing teacher professional communities in recent years. These lenses have been useful in describing key dynamics of professional communities; however, none provides a compelling approach to how to integrate data from the school as a whole with case study data on individual interactions to create a coherent account of the structure and dynamics of teacher professional communities. Objective Our objective was to present and illustrate the application of social capital theory for analyzing the role of formal and informal teacher interactions in helping teachers enact changes to instruction associated with ambitious school reforms. Social capital theory posits that valued resources and expertise are embedded within social networks and that it is through social ties that one gains access to and can make use of resources to effect change. The network perspective directs researchers to focus simultaneously on the overall social structure of a school and on the expertise and resources exchanged through interactions among teachers that take place in meetings, staff rooms, hallways, and classrooms. Setting Our illustrations are contrasting cases of teacher communities in two elementary schools in California. In both school communities, the principals were committed to the idea of fostering greater interaction among colleagues as a strategy to improve literacy instruction. Both schools had similar levels of resources to support their goals through external funding from the state, but the schools had had different levels of success in implementing their reforms at the time of the study. Research Design We used an explanatory case study methodology that relied on social network, survey, and interview methods as sources of evidence for several alternative hypotheses relating to how the distribution of resources and expertise may have contributed to these schools’ different levels of success in implementing their reforms. Conclusions/Recommendations The comparative case analysis of the two schools provided evidence that analyzing the internal structure of the school community was necessary to help account for the distribution of access to resources and expertise in these two schools. Moreover, there was some evidence from survey and network data that the distribution of valued resources and expertise was related to the level of change observed in each school.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[2]  J. Little.  Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work , 2002 .

[3]  Charles E. Bidwell,et al.  The Collegial Focus: Teaching Fields, Collegial Relationships, and Instructional Practice in American High Schools. , 1999 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[5]  Christopher Hoadley,et al.  Investigating the Potential of Using Social Network Analysis in Educational Evaluation , 2006 .

[6]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[7]  M. Gray,et al.  Social Capital at Work , 2004 .

[8]  J. Little,et al.  Inside Teacher Community: Representations of Classroom Practice. , 2003 .

[9]  Richard Halverson,et al.  Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective , 2001 .

[10]  William R. Penuel,et al.  The ‘New’ Science of Networks and the Challenge of School Change , 2007 .

[11]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[12]  Lawrence P. Gallagher,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation , 2007 .

[13]  K. Frank.  Mapping interactions within and between cohesive subgroups , 1996 .

[14]  B. Achinstein.  Community, Diversity, and Conflict Among Schoolteachers: the Ties that Blind (Advances in Contemporary Educational Thought Series) , 2002 .

[15]  W. Hoy.  Faculty Trust in Colleagues : Linking the Principal with School Effectiveness , 1992 .

[16]  J. Bransford,et al.  Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. , 2005 .

[17]  B. Achinstein,et al.  Conflict Amid Community: The Micropolitics of Teacher Collaboration. , 2002 .

[18]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[19]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[20]  M. Woolcock.  Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework , 1998 .

[21]  J. Little.  Norms of Collegiality and Experimentation: Workplace Conditions of School Success , 1982 .

[22]  G. Homans.  The human group , 1952 .

[23]  Kenneth A. Frank,et al.  Linking Action to Social Structure within a System: Social Capital within and between Subgroups1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Finding a Measure of Trust@@@Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement , 2004 .

[25]  William R. Penuel,et al.  The Distribution of Resources and Expertise and the Implementation of Schoolwide Reform Initiatives , 2006, ICLS.

[26]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Social Capital and the Diffusion of Innovations within Organizations: Application to the Implementation of Computer Technology in Schools , 2004 .

[27]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[28]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[29]  J. Little.  The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers' Professional Relations , 1990, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[30]  Richard Halverson,et al.  Systems of Practice: How Leaders Use Artifacts to Create Professional Community in Schools , 2003 .

[31]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[32]  C. Coburn,et al.  District Policy and Teachers’ Social Networks , 2008 .

[33]  James P. Spillane.  Distributed Leadership , 2005 .

[34]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[35]  A. W. Hoy,et al.  Collective Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning, Measure, and Impact on Student Achievement , 2000 .

[36]  Sam Wineburg,et al.  What Makes Teacher Community Different from a Gathering of Teachers? An Occasional Paper. , 2000 .

[37]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  Eric M. Camburn,et al.  Distributed Leadership in Schools: The Case of Elementary Schools Adopting Comprehensive School Reform Models , 2003 .

[39]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  Kenneth A. Frank,et al.  Chapter 5: Quantitative Methods for Studying Social Context in Multilevels and Through Interpersonal Relations , 1998 .

[41]  D. Mason,et al.  Compartments revealed in food-web structure , 2003, Nature.

[42]  R. Elmore.  Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice , 1996 .

[43]  M. Hutchinson.  The Social Life of Information , 2002 .

[44]  Philip Hallinger,et al.  Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration , 1996 .

[45]  R. Putnam.  The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[46]  Kenneth A. Frank,et al.  Identifying cohesive subgroups , 1995 .

[47]  Maryl Gearhart,et al.  Looking at Student Work for Teacher Learning, Teacher Community, and School Reform , 2003 .

[48]  J. Talbert,et al.  Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching , 2001 .

[49]  A. Portes,et al.  Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Toward a Theory of Teacher Community. , 2001 .

[51]  Charles E. Bidwell,et al.  The Collegial Focus and High School Students' Achievement , 2001 .

[52]  R. Ralph,et al.  Social Pressures in Informal Groups. , 1951 .

[53]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Quantitative Methods for Studying Social Context in Multilevels and through Interpersonal Relations for Review of Research in Education , 1998 .

[54]  N. Lin.  Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action , 2001 .