Corporate Psychopaths, Bullying and Unfair Supervision in the Workplace

This article reports on empirical research that establishes strong, positive, and significant correlations between the ethical issues of bullying and unfair supervision in the workplace and the presence of Corporate Psychopaths. The main measure for bullying is identified as being the witnessing of the unfavorable treatment of others at work. Unfair supervision was measured by perceptions that an employee’s supervisor was unfair and showed little interest in the feelings of subordinates. This article discusses the theoretical links between psychopathy and bullying and notes that little empirical evidence confirms the connection in management research. The sample of 346 Australian senior white collar workers used in the research is described as is the measure of behavior for identifying psychopaths. The findings are then presented and discussed showing that when Corporate Psychopaths are present in a work environment, the level of bullying is significantly greater than when they are not present. Further, that when Corporate Psychopaths are present, supervisors are strongly perceived as being unfair to employees and disinterested in their feelings. This article concludes that around 26% of bullying is accounted for by 1% of the employee population, those who are Corporate Psychopaths.

[1]  Pamela Lutgen-Sandvik,et al.  Intensive Remedial Identity Work: Responses to Workplace Bullying Trauma and Stigmatization , 2008 .

[2]  Nikola Djurkovic,et al.  The physical and psychological effects of workplace bullying and their relationship to intention to leave: a test of the psychosomatic and disability hypotheses , 2004 .

[3]  David Wornham A Descriptive Investigation of Morality and Victimisation at Work , 2003 .

[4]  E. Viding Annotation: Understanding the development of psychopathy: Understanding the development of psychopathy , 2004 .

[5]  M. Huss,et al.  An alternative explanation for cross-cultural differences in the expression of psychopathy , 2008 .

[6]  Delroy L. Paulhus,et al.  Predictors of a behavioral measure of scholastic cheating: Personality and competence but not demographics , 2006 .

[7]  Sarah J. Tracy,et al.  Nightmares, Demons, and Slaves , 2006 .

[8]  B. Tepper,et al.  Consequences of Abusive Supervision , 2000 .

[9]  S. Porter,et al.  Characteristics of Sexual Homicides Committed by Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders , 2003, Law and human behavior.

[10]  R. Stevenson,et al.  The characteristics of non-criminals with high psychopathy traits : are they similar to criminal psychopaths? , 2008 .

[11]  D. Perrett,et al.  Reduced sensitivity to others’ fearful expressions in psychopathic individuals , 2004 .

[12]  D. Lynam,et al.  Two Approaches to Parsing the Heterogeneity of Psychopathy , 2006 .

[13]  E. Viding Annotation: understanding the development of psychopathy. , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[14]  Helen LaVan,et al.  Bullying in the U.S. Workplace: Normative and Process-Oriented Ethical Approaches , 2008 .

[15]  S Baron-Cohen,et al.  Theory of mind and psychopathy: can psychopathic individuals read the ‘language of the eyes’? , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  K. Fritzon,et al.  Disordered personalities at work , 2005 .

[17]  J. Wuest,et al.  A Theoretical Understanding of Sickness Absence Among Women Who Have Experienced Workplace Bullying , 2010, Qualitative health research.

[18]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Brain potentials implicate temporal lobe abnormalities in criminal psychopaths. , 2006, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[19]  Darren C. Treadway,et al.  Bullying in the 21st Century Global Organization: An Ethical Perspective , 2009 .

[20]  Roberta Garner,et al.  The joy of stats : a short guide to introductory statistics in the social sciences , 2010 .

[21]  Laura S. Guy,et al.  Examining the utility of the PCL:SV as a screening measure using competing factor models of psychopathy. , 2006, Psychological assessment.

[22]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction , 2004 .

[23]  Muel Kaptein,et al.  Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say? , 2004 .

[24]  C. Boddy,et al.  The Implications of Corporate Psychopaths for Business And Society: An Initial Examination And A Call To Arms , 2005 .

[25]  Wim Vandekerckhove,et al.  Downward Workplace Mobbing: A Sign of the Times? , 2003 .

[26]  From CR‐psychopaths to responsible corporations: waking up the inner Sleeping Beauty of companies , 2006 .

[27]  D. Comer,et al.  Sticks and Stones may Break Your Bones, but Words can Break Your Spirit: Bullying in the Workplace , 2005 .

[28]  Richard K. Ladyshewsky,et al.  The Influence of Corporate Psychopaths on Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Commitment to Employees , 2010 .

[29]  Randy Hodson,et al.  Chaos and the Abuse of Power , 2006 .

[30]  P. Babiak When Psychopaths go to Work: A Case Study of an Industrial Psychopath , 1995 .

[31]  Elfi Baillien,et al.  Why is Organizational Change Related to Workplace Bullying? Role Conflict and Job Insecurity as Mediators , 2009 .

[32]  Mark Promislo,et al.  Unethical and Unwell: Decrements in Well-Being and Unethical Activity at Work , 2010 .

[33]  R. Blair,et al.  Is the Psychopath ‘morally insane’?☆ , 1995 .

[34]  S. Douglas,et al.  ABUSIVE SUPERVISION: PERCEPTION OR REALITY? , 2009 .

[35]  C. Boddy,et al.  The dark side of management decisions: organisational psychopaths , 2006 .

[36]  Min Yang,et al.  The distribution of psychopathy among a household population: categorical or dimensional? , 2008, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[37]  P. Hayes,et al.  Psychopathy and sensitivity to the emotional polarity of metaphorical statements , 2003 .

[38]  P. Sweeney Organizational Chaos and Relative Powerlessness: Breeding Ground for Bullies? , 2007 .

[39]  Robert A. Zinko,et al.  A Bully as an Archetypal Destructive Leader , 2007 .

[40]  Onne Janssen Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction , 2001 .

[41]  D. K. Marcus,et al.  INTERPERSONAL PERCEPTION OF PSYCHOPATHY: A SOCIAL RELATIONS ANALYSIS , 2006 .

[42]  R. Pech,et al.  Organisational sociopaths: rarely challenged, often promoted. Why? , 2007 .

[43]  B. Tepper Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda , 2007 .