Usable information for policy: An appraisal of the U.S. Global Change Research Program

The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) was established in law in 1990 (P.L. 101–606) with a mandate to provide policymakers with ‘usable information.’ The law gave a White House Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences (CEES) responsibility to implement the program with respect to its policy mandate. In 1994 CEES was replaced, in part, because it failed to provide ‘usable information.’ This article, documenting the development of the program's policy mandate and CEES implementation of the USGCRP, finds a performance shortfall. The shortfall is attributed to a breakdown in the legislative process, participant perspectives, and the structure of post-World War II science policy. The purpose of the article is to explain the CEES performance shortfall in hope that its successor can improve USGCRP performance with respect to its legal mandate based upon the lessons of experience.

[1]  V. Bush.  Science, the Endless Frontier , 1999, Science, the Endless Frontier.

[2]  W H G Armytage.  The Endless Frontier , 1961 .

[3]  Amitai Etzioni.  How may Congress learn? , 1968, Science.

[4]  H. Lasswell.  A pre-view of policy sciences , 1971 .

[5]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[6]  Amitai Etzioni.  Riding a whirlwind , 1982 .

[7]  Morgan Sherwood,et al.  A patron for pure science : the National Science Foundation's formative years, 1945-57 , 1983 .

[8]  James G. March,et al.  Theories of choice and making decisions , 1982 .

[9]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[10]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Peer Review and the Public Interest. , 1985 .

[11]  G. Wise,et al.  Science and Technology , 1985, Osiris.

[12]  M. Rossiter.  Science and Public Policy since World War II , 1985, Osiris.

[13]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  The Critical Appraisal of Scientific Inquiries with Policy Implications , 1985 .

[14]  Stanley A. Changnon,et al.  Arresting Technology: Government, Scientists, and Weather Modification , 1989 .

[15]  L. Roberts.  Global Warming: Blaming the Sun: A report that essentially wishes away greenhouse warming is said to be having a major influence on White House policy. , 1989, Science.

[16]  A. Barrie Pittock.  Our Changing Planet: The FY 1990 Research Plan, the U.S. Global Change Research Program and its update our Changing Planet: The FY 1991 U.S. Global Change Research Program , 1990 .

[17]  Bruce L. R. Smith,et al.  American Science Policy Since World War II , 1990 .

[18]  Ronald D. Brunner.  Global climate change: defining the policy problem , 1991 .

[19]  W. A. Nitze.  Improving U.S. Interagency Coordinaton of International Environmental Policy Development , 1991 .

[20]  J. Perry.  Global Change: from Rhetoric to Reality , 1991 .

[21]  Ronald D. Brunner.  Performance as promised. Restructuring the US civil space programme , 1992 .

[22]  David P. Hamilton,et al.  R&D budget collides with the deficit. , 1992, Science.

[23]  Ronald D. Brunner,et al.  Science and social responsibility , 1992 .

[24]  R. Monastersky.  The $1. 5 billion question: Can the US Global Change Research Program deliver on its promises , 1993 .

[25]  I. Goodwin.  Conversation with Allan Bromley: Reflections On Exiting Center Stage , 1993 .

[26]  S. Rayner.  Global change research: Science and policy , 1993 .

[27]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  Integrated assessment of climate change. , 1993, Science.

[28]  W. Henry Lambright,et al.  Administrative Entrepreneurship and Space Technology: The Ups and Downs of "Mission to Planet Earth." , 1994 .

[29]  Ronald D. Brunner.  Myth and American politics , 1994 .

[30]  R. Moe,et al.  THE REINVENTING GOVERNMENT EXERCISE: MISINTERPRETING THE PROBLEM, MISJUDGING THE CONSEQUENCES , 1994 .