Multi-Criteria Assessment of Spatial Robust Water Resource Vulnerability Using the TOPSIS Method Coupled with Objective and Subjective Weights in the Han River Basin

This study developed a multi-criteria approach to spatially assess the robust water resource vulnerability in sub-basins and applied it to the Han River basin. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) suggested three factors of vulnerability; namely, exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity were used in this study with respect to water quantity and quality. In this study, 16 water quantity indicators and 13 water quality indicators were selected to identify the vulnerability using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. Environmental and socioeconomic data were obtained from the national statistics database, and hydrological data were simulated using the calibrated Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. Expert surveys and Shannon entropy method were used to determine subjective and objective weights for all indicators, individually. As a result, water quantity-vulnerable sub-basins were associated with high water use and water leakage ratios. Water quality-vulnerable sub-basins were associated with relatively high values of maximum consecutive dry days and heatwave days. The water quantity indices of both weighting methods showed relatively similar spatial distributions, while the distribution of water quality indices was distinct. These results suggest that considering different weighting methods is important for assessing the robust water resource vulnerability of sub-basins.

[1]  Amy Luers,et al.  Assessing the Vulnerability of Social-Environmental Systems , 2006 .

[2]  Seongjoon Kim,et al.  Analysis of water balance by surface–groundwater interaction using the SWAT model for the Han River basin, South Korea , 2018, Paddy and Water Environment.

[3]  H. Eakin.  The Social Vulnerability of Irrigated Vegetable Farming Households in Central Puebla , 2003 .

[4]  T. Chu.  Selecting Plant Location via a Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach , 2002 .

[5]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[6]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[7]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South Korea , 2013 .

[8]  Steven J. Burian,et al.  Incorporating Potential Severity into Vulnerability Assessment of Water Supply Systems under Climate Change Conditions , 2016 .

[9]  J. Seager,et al.  Perspectives and limitations of indicators in water management , 2001 .

[10]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  I. Acosta,et al.  Assessment of Surface Runoff Vulnerability to Climate Change in the Lerma-Chapala Basin, Mexico , 2014 .

[12]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Integrated multi-criteria flood vulnerability approach using fuzzy TOPSIS and Delphi technique , 2013 .

[13]  Trevor C. Hughes,et al.  Vulnerability of Water Supply Systems to Droughts , 1980 .

[14]  Yeonjoo Kim,et al.  Assessing climate change vulnerability with group multi-criteria decision making approaches , 2013, Climatic Change.

[15]  Mushtaque Ahmed,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment of Environmental and Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources in Al Jabal Al Akhdar, Sultanate of Oman , 2014 .

[16]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Water Resource Vulnerability Characteristics by District’s Population Size in a Changing Climate Using Subjective and Objective Weights , 2014 .

[17]  Xiaoqian Liu,et al.  Assessing vulnerability to drought based on exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity: A case study in middle Inner Mongolia of China , 2013, Chinese Geographical Science.

[18]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[19]  Elizabeth L. Malone,et al.  VULNERABILITY TO CLIMATE CHANGE A Quantitative Approach , 2001 .

[20]  Mohamed A. Hamouda,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment of Water Resources Systems in the Eastern Nile Basin , 2009 .

[21]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Identification of Spatial Ranking of Hydrological Vulnerability Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques: Case Study of Korea , 2009 .

[22]  S. Burian,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment to Support Integrated Water Resources Management of Metropolitan Water Supply Systems , 2017 .

[23]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communications , 1948 .

[24]  I. Hendry.  The Delphi method: Techniques and applications Edited by H. A. Linstone and M. Turoff. Pp. xx + 620. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program, Reading, Massachusetts. 1975. US $29.50; US $16.50 paper , 1976 .

[25]  R. D,et al.  Climate change 2001‐impacts, adaptation, vulnerability edited by James J. Mccarthy Osvaldo F. Canziani Cambridge University Press New York, NY (2001)1,032 pages softcover ISBN 0‐521‐01500‐6 U.S. list price: $49.95 , 2001 .

[26]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria approach to flood risk vulnerability in South Korea by considering climate change impacts , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Development of spatial water resources vulnerability index considering climate change impacts. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[30]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[31]  P. Waggoner.  Climate change and US water resources. , 1990 .