Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the 3-dimensional (3D) changes in the hard and soft tissues of skeletal class III malocclusion (CIII) patients with or without facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery (MSS). STUDY DESIGN Seventeen adult CIII patients treated with MSS (bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy) who had 3D computerized tomography taken 1 month before (T0) and 6 months after (T1) MSS, were allocated into group 1 (symmetry, menton deviation (MD) <4 mm; n = 8) or group 2 (asymmetry, MD >4 mm; n = 9). The landmarks and variables were measured with Rapidform 2006 (Inus Technology). RESULTS Mandibular prognathism was significantly corrected in both groups. Facial asymmetry in group 2 was significantly corrected not only in the lower lip and chin but also in the philtrum deviation and mouth corner of the deviated side. The hard and soft tissue changes were more related in the horizontal and anteroposterior aspects than in the vertical one. CONCLUSION Three-dimensional evaluation showed a significant difference in the hard and soft tissue changes between symmetric and asymmetric MSS.

[1]  H. G. Hershey,et al.  Soft-tissue profile change associated with surgical correction of the prognathic mandible. , 1974, American journal of orthodontics.

[2]  B Fromm,et al.  The soft-tissue facial profile before and after surgical correction of mandibular protrusion. , 1970, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[3]  William R Proffit,et al.  Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  W R Fright,et al.  A three dimensional analysis of soft and hard tissue changes following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in skeletal III patients. , 1992, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[5]  W. Kerr,et al.  Soft and hard tissue changes in Class III patients treated by bimaxillary surgery. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[6]  M W Vannier,et al.  Three dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation. , 1984, Radiology.

[7]  L. Wictorin,et al.  Changes of facial profile after surgical treatment of mandibular protrusion. A cephalometric study, 1 and 11 years after treatment. , 1971, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  White Rp,et al.  Cephalometric prediction for orthodontic surgery. , 1972 .

[9]  S. Aaronson A cephalometric investigation of the surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. , 1967, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  Patricia V. M. Alves,et al.  How the Lower Face Soft Tissue Changes After Mandibular Advancement or Setback , 2008, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[11]  E. O. Bergersen,et al.  Enlargement and distortion in cephalometric radiography: compensation tables for linear measurements. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  E. Cho,et al.  Soft tissue changes after double jaw surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion , 1996 .

[13]  Murat Soncul,et al.  Evaluation of facial soft tissue changes with optical surface scan after surgical correction of Class III deformities. , 2004, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[14]  D. Willmot,et al.  Soft Tissue Profile Changes following Correction of Class III Malocclusions by Mandibular Surgery , 1981, British journal of orthodontics.

[15]  Y. Kajikawa Changes in soft tissue profile after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion. , 1979, Journal of oral surgery.

[16]  R A Fuhrmann,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of craniomaxillofacial structures with a standard personal computer. , 1995, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[17]  Ming Tak Chew,et al.  Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese Class III patients. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[18]  F L Bookstein,et al.  The three-dimensional cephalogram: theory, technique, and clinical application. , 1988, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  G Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional dental imaging by spiral CT. A progress report. , 1997, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[20]  Seiji Haraguchi,et al.  Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[21]  K. Fanibunda Changes in the facial profile following correction for mandibular prognathism. , 1989, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[22]  R J Isaacson,et al.  Soft tissue profile change produced by reduction of mandibular prognathism. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[23]  Myung-Jin Kim,et al.  Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry: a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[24]  J. P. Moss,et al.  Three-dimensional assessment of treatment outcomes on the face. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[25]  A E Athanasiou,et al.  Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  A H Sather,et al.  Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. , 1994, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.