Managing energy performance in buildings from design to operation using modelling and calibration

To manage the concerns regarding the energy performance gap in buildings, a structured and longitudinal performance assessment of buildings, covering design through to operation, is necessary. Modelling can form an integral part of this process by ensuring that a good practice design stage modelling is followed by an ongoing evaluation of operational stage performance using a robust calibration protocol. In this paper, we demonstrate, via a case study of an office building, how a good practice design stage model can be fine-tuned for operational stage using a new framework that helps validate the causes for deviations of actual performance from design intents. This paper maps the modelling based process of tracking building performance from design to operation, identifying the various types of performance gaps. Further, during the operational stage, the framework provides a systematic way to separate the effect of (i) operating conditions that are driven by the building’s actual function and occupancy as compared with the design assumptions, and (ii) the effect of potential technical issues that cause underperformance. As the identification of issues is based on energy modelling, the process requires use of advanced and well-documented simulation tools. The paper concludes with providing an outline of the software platform requirements needed to generate robust design models and their calibration for operational performance assessments. Practical application The paper’s findings are a useful guide for building industry professionals to manage the performance gap with appropriate accuracy through a robust methodology in an easy to use workflow. The methodological framework to analyse building energy performance in-use links best practice design stage modelling guidance with a robust operational stage investigation. It helps designers, contractors, building managers and other stakeholders with an understanding of procedures to follow to undertake an effective measurement and verification exercise.

[1]  Mark S. Martinez,et al.  International performance measurement & verification protocol: Concepts and options for determining energy and water savings , 2001 .

[2]  AbStr Act.  Why good buildings go bad while some are just born that way , 2009 .

[3]  Rory V. Jones,et al.  The building energy performance gap: Up close and personal , 2014 .

[4]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  PERFORMANCE GAP AND THERMAL MODELLING: A COMPARISON OF SIMULATION RESULTS AND ACTUAL ENERGY PERFORMANCE FOR AN ACADEMY IN NORTH WEST ENGLAND , 2012 .

[5]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  Cross-sectoral assessment of the performance gap using calibrated building energy performance simulation , 2020 .

[6]  Jez Wingfield,et al.  Phase 1: Centenary Quay Fabric and District Heating performance Study , 2013 .

[7]  E Burman.  Assessing the operational performance of educational buildings against design expectations - a case study approach , 2016 .

[8]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Evidence-based calibration of a building energy simulation model: Application to an office building in Belgium , 2012 .

[9]  Paul Raftery,et al.  Calibrating whole building energy models: An evidence-based methodology , 2011 .

[10]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings , 2001 .

[11]  Catalina Spataru,et al.  Corrigendum: A Review of the Energy Performance Gap and Its Underlying Causes in Non-Domestic Buildings , 2016, Front. Mech. Eng..

[12]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  Towards measurement and verification of energy performance under the framework of the European directive for energy performance of buildings , 2014 .

[13]  Charles Culp,et al.  Uncalibrated Building Energy Simulation Modeling Results , 2006 .

[14]  Catalina Spataru,et al.  A Review of the Regulatory Energy Performance Gap and Its Underlying Causes in Non-domestic Buildings , 2016, Front. Mech. Eng..

[15]  David Lee,et al.  ENERNET: Studying the dynamic relationship between building occupancy and energy consumption , 2012 .

[16]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation , 2014 .