Axiomatization in the Meaning Sciences

While much of semantic theorizing is based on intuitions about logical phenomena associated with linguistic constructions—phenomena such as consistency and entailment—it is rare to see axiomatic treatments of linguistic fragments. Given a fragment interpreted in some class of formally specified models, it is often possible to ask for a characterization of the reasoning patterns validated by the class of models. Axiomatizations provide such a characterization, often in a perspicuous and efficient manner. This chapter highlights some of the benefits of providing axiomatizations for the purpose of semantic theorizing. Three examples from the study of modality provide an illustration of these benefits.

[1]  J. Hartigan Theories of Probability , 1983 .

[2]  Matthew Harrison-Trainor,et al.  A note on cancellation axioms for comparative probability , 2016 .

[3]  David Lewis Counterfactuals and Comparative Possibility , 1973 .

[4]  Timothy Williamson,et al.  Modal Logic as Metaphysics , 2013 .

[5]  Ephrem MacCarthy,et al.  Aristotle’s Syllogistic: From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic , 1952 .

[6]  M. Kracht Tools and Techniques in Modal Logic , 1999 .

[7]  Nissim Francez,et al.  Proof-theoretic semantics for a natural language fragment , 2010 .

[8]  Johan van Benthem Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction: Preface , 2011 .

[9]  John P. Burgess,et al.  Quick completeness proofs for some logics of conditionals , 1981, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[10]  Salvador Mascarenhas,et al.  THE EROTETIC THEORY OF REASONING: BRIDGES BETWEEN FORMAL SEMANTICS AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF DEDUCTIVE INFERENCE* , 2013 .

[11]  Pieter A. M. Seuren Meaning and Grammar , 2009 .

[12]  Daniel Gallin,et al.  Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic , 1975 .

[13]  Seth Yalcin,et al.  Probability Operators , 2010 .

[14]  Fabrizio Cariani,et al.  'Ought' and Resolution Semantics. , 2013 .

[15]  Richmond H. Thomason,et al.  A semantic analysis of conditional logic1 , 2008 .

[16]  David R. Dowty The Role of Negative Polarity and Concord Marking in Natural Language Reasoning , 1994 .

[17]  Rachael Briggs,et al.  Interventionist counterfactuals , 2012 .

[18]  Reinhard Muskens,et al.  Higher order modal logic , 2007, Handbook of Modal Logic.

[19]  A. Kratzer The Notional Category of Modality , 2008 .

[20]  Paolo Santorio,et al.  Alternatives and Truthmakers in Conditional Semantics , 2018 .

[21]  Z. Szabó Semantics versus Pragmatics , 2005 .

[22]  Ehud Lehrer,et al.  Subjective multi-prior probability: A representation of a partial likelihood relation , 2014, J. Econ. Theory.

[23]  Wesley H. Holliday,et al.  Indicative Conditionals and Dynamic Epistemic Logic , 2017, TARK.

[24]  D. Lewis,et al.  Completeness and decidability of three logics of counterfactual conditionals1 , 2008 .

[25]  P. Suppes THE AXIOMATIC METHOD IN THE EMPIRICAL SCIENCES' , 1974 .

[26]  Samuel C. Wheeler Attributives and their Modifiers , 1972 .

[27]  Krister Segerberg,et al.  Qualitative Probability in a Modal Setting , 1971 .

[28]  S. Yalcin Epistemic Modals , 2007 .

[29]  Daniel Lassiter,et al.  Gradable epistemic modals, probability, and scale structure , 2010 .

[30]  David Rios Insua On the foundations of decision making under partial information , 1992 .

[31]  J. Benthem Essays in Logical Semantics , 1986 .

[32]  Max J. Cresswell,et al.  The Autonomy of Semantics , 1982 .

[33]  M. Krifka The Origins of Telicity , 1998 .

[34]  F.J.M.M. Veltman,et al.  Logics for conditionals. , 1985 .

[35]  Robert Stalnaker A Theory of Conditionals , 2019, Knowledge and Conditionals.

[36]  Thomas F. Icard III,et al.  Recent Progress on Monotonicity , 2014, LILT.

[37]  Robert Givan,et al.  Natural Language Syntax and First-Order Inference , 1992, Artificial Intelligence.

[38]  J. Pearl,et al.  An Axiomatic Characterization of Causal Counterfactuals , 1998 .

[39]  Daniel Lassiter,et al.  Epistemic Comparison, Models of Uncertainty, and the Disjunction Puzzle , 2015, J. Semant..

[40]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Modal Logic , 2001, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science.

[41]  M. Dummett Elements of Intuitionism , 2000 .

[42]  A. Kratzer Modals and Conditionals , 2012 .

[43]  Daniel Lassiter Measurement and Modality: The Scalar Basis of Modal Semantics. , 2011 .

[44]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Introduction to Montague semantics , 1980 .

[45]  John MacFarlane,et al.  Ifs and Oughts , 2010 .

[46]  Joseph Y. Halpern Defining Relative Likelihood in Partially-Ordered Preferential Structures , 1996, UAI.

[47]  Lawrence S. Moss,et al.  Natural Logic and Semantics , 2009, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[48]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Qualitative probability as an intensional logic , 1975, J. Philos. Log..

[49]  Joseph Y. Halpern Reasoning about uncertainty , 2003 .

[50]  Lawrence S. Moss,et al.  LOGICS FOR THE RELATIONAL SYLLOGISTIC , 2008, The Review of Symbolic Logic.

[51]  Lawrence S. Moss,et al.  A Complete Calculus of Monotone and Antitone Higher-Order Functions , 2013, TACL.

[52]  Fabrizio Cariani Consequence and Contrast in Deontic Semantics , 2016 .

[53]  A. Heifetz,et al.  The logic of Knightian games , 2013 .

[54]  Guillaume Aucher,et al.  Dynamic epistemic logic in update logic , 2016, J. Log. Comput..

[55]  Richard Montague,et al.  Pragmatics and intensional logic , 1970, Synthese.

[56]  Michael Glanzberg,et al.  Lexical Meaning, Concepts, and the Metasemantics of Predicates , 2018, Oxford Scholarship Online.

[57]  J. Keynes A Treatise on Probability. , 1923 .

[58]  Dag Prawitz,et al.  Meaning Approached Via Proofs , 2006, Synthese.

[59]  Joseph Y. Halpern FROM CAUSAL MODELS TO COUNTERFACTUAL STRUCTURES , 2010, The Review of Symbolic Logic.

[60]  P. Santorio Filtering Semantics for Counterfactuals: Bridging Causal Models and Premise Semantics , 2014 .

[61]  P Santorio,et al.  Interventions in Premise Semantics , 2016 .

[62]  Seth Yalcin,et al.  A Counterexample to Modus Tollens , 2012, J. Philos. Log..

[63]  Daniel Lassiter Graded Modality , 2020, The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics.

[64]  Matthew Harrison-Trainor,et al.  Preferential Structures for Comparative Probabilistic Reasoning , 2017, AAAI.

[65]  W. V. Quine Review: Alfred Tarski, Uber den Begriff der Logischen Folgerung , 1937 .

[66]  Emmon Bach,et al.  Natural Language Metaphysics , 1986 .

[67]  Valentin Goranko,et al.  Refutation systems in modal logic , 1994, Stud Logica.

[68]  W. Holliday,et al.  Measure semantics and qualitative semantics for epistemic modals , 2013 .

[69]  E. Doerr,et al.  General Semantics. , 1958, Science.

[70]  Frederik Van De Putte Coarse Deontic Logic (short version) , 2016, DEON.

[71]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  Representation and Inference for Natural Language: A First Course in Computational Semantics , 2005, Computational Linguistics.

[72]  Lance J. Rips The psychology of proof: Deduction in human thinking , 1994 .