Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension

Abstract The purpose of this study was to test a hypothesized model that specified direct and indirect linkages between the individual difference variables of epistemic beliefs, need for cognition, individual interest, and prior knowledge, the processing variables of effort, deeper-level strategies, and situational interest, and multiple-text comprehension. Using a path analysis approach with a sample of 279 Norwegian upper secondary school students, results indicated that students' effort and deeper-level strategies predicted their multiple-text comprehension, with the individual difference variables indirectly affecting multiple-text comprehension through their influence on effortful, adaptive multiple-text processing. In addition, students' prior knowledge about the topic of the texts seemed to affect their multiple-text comprehension directly as well as indirectly. Both theoretical and educational implications of the results are discussed.

[1]  Sascha Schroeder,et al.  What Readers Have and Do: Effects of Students' Verbal Ability and Reading Time Components on Comprehension with and without Text Availability , 2011 .

[2]  Marit S. Samuelstuen,et al.  Measuring strategic processing: comparing task-specific self-reports to traces , 2007 .

[3]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Implementation and effects of explicit reading comprehension instruction in fifth-grade classrooms , 2011 .

[4]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[5]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[6]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[7]  M. Daneman,et al.  Integration and its effect on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories for text. , 1996 .

[8]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  The Path to Competence: A Lifespan Developmental Perspective on Reading , 2005 .

[10]  Krista R. Muis,et al.  Epistemic profiles and metacognition: support for the consistency hypothesis , 2010 .

[11]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension , 2008 .

[12]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Behavior and Competence , 2012, Reading Research Quarterly.

[13]  S. Wineburg.  Historical Problem Solving: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary and Pictorial Evidence , 1991 .

[14]  Levin,et al.  Information Processing at Successive Stages of Decision Making: Need for Cognition and Inclusion-Exclusion Effects. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[15]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Does Naturally Occurring Comprehension Strategies Instruction Make a Difference when Students Read Expository Text , 2013 .

[16]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. , 2014, The British journal of educational psychology.

[17]  A. Graesser.  An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. , 2007 .

[18]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Toward an Integrated Model , 2011 .

[19]  S. K. Mangal,et al.  Advanced Educational Psychology , 2004 .

[20]  Erika A. Patall.  Constructing motivation through choice, interest, and interestingness , 2013 .

[21]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[22]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Epistemic Cognition when Students Read Multiple Documents Containing Conflicting Scientific Evidence: A Think-Aloud Study. , 2012 .

[23]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions. , 2012 .

[24]  Cathy Collins Block,et al.  Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices , 2001 .

[25]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  What is Scientific Thinking and How Does it Develop , 2007 .

[26]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  The effect of animation on comprehension and interest , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[27]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. , 1996 .

[28]  Mark C. Fox,et al.  Thinking aloud is not a form of introspection but a qualitatively different methodology: reply to Schooler (2011). , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Ivar Bråten.  Cognitive Strategies: a multi‐componential conception of strategy use and strategy instruction , 1993 .

[30]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[31]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Leisure time reading and orthographic processes in word recognition among Norwegian third- and fourth-grade students , 1999 .

[32]  Mike Rinck,et al.  Chapter 16 – Eye Movement Measures to Study Global Text Processing , 2003 .

[33]  Ralph E. Reynolds,et al.  Effect of Interest on Attention and Learning , 1988 .

[34]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Chapter 9 Toward a Comprehensive Model of Comprehension , 2009 .

[35]  E. Fridell,et al.  The mechanism for NOx storage , 2000 .

[36]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Strategic processing during comprehension. , 1999 .

[37]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[38]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts , 2011 .

[39]  Cathy Collins Block,et al.  Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices. Solving Problems in the Teaching of Literacy. , 2002 .

[40]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[41]  E. Fox.  The Role of Reader Characteristics in Processing and Learning From Informational Text , 2009 .

[42]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[43]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Toward a theory of documents representation. , 1999 .

[44]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  College Instruction and Concomitant Changes in Students’ Knowledge, Interest, and Strategy Use: A Study of Domain Learning , 1997 .

[45]  Jason A. Chen.  Implicit Theories, Epistemic Beliefs, and Science Motivation: A Person-Centered Approach , 2012 .

[46]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Topic interest, text representation, and quality of experience , 1996 .

[47]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  When law students read multiple documents about global warming: examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing , 2010 .

[48]  Michael B. W. Wolfe,et al.  Relations Between Adolescents' Text Processing and Reasoning , 2005 .

[49]  K. Lonka,et al.  Review and Process Effects of Spontaneous Note-Taking on Text Comprehension. , 1999, Contemporary educational psychology.

[50]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[51]  M. Maehr.  Advances in Motivation and Achievement , 1991 .

[52]  Andrew N. Christopher,et al.  Need for Cognition and Conscientiousness as Predictors of Political Interest and Voting Strategy1 , 2009 .

[53]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Sources of Situational Interest , 1995 .

[54]  A. Furnham,et al.  Need for Cognition Its Dimensionality and Personality and Intelligence Correlates , 2013 .

[55]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  Modeling relations between students’ justification for knowing beliefs in science, motivation for understanding what they read in science, and science achievement , 2014 .

[56]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  FACILITATING TEXTUAL INTEGRATION WITH MACRO-STRUCTURE FOCUSING TASKS , 2004 .

[57]  R. O’Brien,et al.  A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors , 2007 .

[58]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Justification beliefs and multiple-documents comprehension , 2013 .

[59]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  The effects of text-based interest on attention and recall. , 2000 .

[60]  P. Broek,et al.  Cognitive Processes in Comprehension of Science Texts : The Role of Co-Activation in Confronting Misconceptions , 2008 .

[61]  R. Ryan,et al.  EMOTIONS IN NONDIRECTED TEXT LEARNING , 1990 .

[62]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension , 2007 .

[63]  Sheryl Lain.  Dimensions of Reading. , 2003 .

[64]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple‐choice tests , 2009 .

[65]  D. Langenberg.  Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[66]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading , 1996 .

[67]  Gregory J. Feist.  Predicting interest in and attitudes toward science from personality and need for cognition , 2012 .

[68]  Michael Weinstock,et al.  What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter , 2002 .

[69]  Janice F. Almasi,et al.  The Impact of a Strategy-Based Intervention on the Comprehension and Strategy Use of Struggling Adolescent Readers. , 2010 .

[70]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. , 2005, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[71]  Ulrich Schiefele.  Interest and Learning From Text , 1999 .

[72]  R. Garner.  Strategies for Reading and Studying Expository Text , 1987 .

[73]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Contributions of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction to Knowledge About Interventions for Motivations in Reading , 2007 .

[74]  Melissa C. Duffy,et al.  Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. , 2013 .

[75]  Marlene Schommer.  Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. , 1990 .

[76]  Danielle S. McNamara.  Reading comprehension strategies : theories, interventions, and technologies , 2007 .

[77]  Marit S. Samuelstuen,et al.  Examining the validity of self-reports on scales measuring students' strategic processing. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[78]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Dealing with Conflicting or Consistent Medical Information on the Web: When Expert Information Breeds Laypersons' Doubts about Experts. , 2011 .

[79]  Mary Ainley,et al.  Students, tasks and emotions: Identifying the contribution of emotions to students' reading of popular culture and popular science texts , 2005 .

[80]  C. Kardash,et al.  Effects of preexisiting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. , 1996 .

[81]  David Yun Dai,et al.  The role of need for cognition and reader beliefs in text comprehension and interest development , 2007 .

[82]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  The role of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons' source evaluations and decisions during Web search on a medical issue , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[83]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Students' achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes , 2010 .

[84]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Self-Explanation and Metacognition , 2009 .

[85]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Students' Strategic Use of Multiple Sources During Expository Text Reading: A Longitudinal Think-Aloud Study , 2003 .

[86]  Jason L. G. Braasch,et al.  Relationships between Spontaneous Note-Taking, Self-Reported Strategies and Comprehension When Reading Multiple Texts in Different Task Conditions. , 2014 .

[87]  David W. Chan,et al.  Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[88]  U. Goswami.  Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development , 2002 .

[89]  J. Cromley,et al.  Reading Comprehension of Scientific Text: A Domain-Specific Test of the Direct and Inferential Mediation Model of Reading Comprehension. , 2010 .

[90]  Tobias Richter,et al.  Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning , 2010 .

[91]  C. J. Sadowski,et al.  Relationships Between Need for Cognition, Knowledge, and Verbal Ability , 2000, The Journal of psychology.

[92]  D. Hine,et al.  Assessing individual differences in adolescents’ preference for rational and experiential cognition , 2008 .

[93]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension , 2010 .

[94]  Susan E. Israel,et al.  Identifying and Describing Constructively Responsive Comprehension Strategies in New and Traditional Forms of Reading , 2014 .

[95]  Mark C. Fox,et al.  Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[96]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Updating situation models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[97]  Paul D. Ellis,et al.  The essential guide to effect sizes : statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results , 2010 .

[98]  J. Moan,et al.  Vitamin D, sun, sunbeds and health , 2011, Public Health Nutrition.

[99]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Documents as Entities: Extending the Situation Model Theory of Comprehension , 2012 .

[100]  Maria Caterina Tornatora,et al.  Besides knowledge: a cross-sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science , 2013 .

[101]  B. Hofer.  Epistemological Understanding as a Metacognitive Process: Thinking Aloud During Online Searching , 2004 .

[102]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Comprehension effects of signalling relationships between documents in search engines , 2010, Computers in Human Behavior.

[103]  Marcia B. Baxter Magolda.  Evolution of a Constructivist Conceptualization of Epistemological Reflection , 2004 .

[104]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[105]  P. Alexander,et al.  Reading Into the Future: Competence for the 21st Century , 2012 .

[106]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[107]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning , 2006 .

[108]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  Effects of Personal Epistemology on the Understanding of Multiple Texts , 2006 .

[109]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. , 1999 .

[110]  Mary Ainley,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning Processes through Tracking Patterns of Student Interaction with Achievement Activities , 2006 .

[111]  C. Jacobson.  Word Recognition Index (WRI) as a Quick Screening Marker of Dyslexia , 1995 .

[112]  Jason L. G. Braasch,et al.  Comprehending and Learning From Internet Sources: Processing Patterns of Better and Poorer Learners , 2012, Reading Research Quarterly.

[113]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Epistemic beliefs and comprehension in the context of reading multiple documents: Examining the role of conflict , 2013 .

[114]  P. V. Meter,et al.  A Quasi-experimental Validation of Transactional Strategies Instruction with Low-Achieving Second-Grade Readers. , 1996 .

[115]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of internet-based learning , 2010 .

[116]  S. Hidi,et al.  Interest, Learning, and the Psychological Processes That Mediate Their Relationship. , 2002 .

[117]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents , 2014 .

[118]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[119]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Student Profiles of Knowledge and Epistemic Beliefs: Changes and Relations to Multiple-Text Comprehension. , 2013 .

[120]  Jason L. G. Braasch,et al.  Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents , 2013 .

[121]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and multiple‐text comprehension among upper secondary students , 2009 .

[122]  S. Hidi.  Interest, Reading, and Learning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations , 2001 .

[123]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Engagement and Motivation in Reading , 2000 .

[124]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Motivation for Reading Comprehension. , 2009 .

[125]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Situational and individual interest. , 2009 .

[126]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information , 2002 .

[127]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Literacies for Learning: A Multiple Source Comprehension Illustration , 2013 .

[128]  R. Bromme,et al.  Dealing With Uncertainty: Readers' Memory for and Use of Conflicting Information From Science Texts as Function of Presentation Format and Source Expertise , 2013 .

[129]  Michelle Kelly,et al.  Using Think-Alouds to Examine Reader-Text Interest , 1999 .

[130]  Gerald G. Duffy,et al.  Effects of Explaining the Reasoning Associated with Using Reading Strategies. , 1987 .

[131]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .

[132]  Sam Wineburg,et al.  Reading Abraham Lincoln: An Expert/Expert Study in the Interpretation of Historical Texts , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[133]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive processes in comprehension , 1977 .

[134]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Prediction of learning and comprehension when adolescents read multiple texts: the roles of word-level processing, strategic approach, and reading motivation , 2013 .

[135]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Modeling Epistemic and Ontological Cognition: Philosophical Perspectives and Methodological Directions , 2008 .

[136]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .