Experimental studies on nonlinear seismic control of a steel-concrete hybrid structure using MR dampers

This article presents experimental studies on the feasibility of nonlinear seismic control of a 3-story steel–concrete hybrid structure using magnetorheological (MR) dampers. The control strategies included passive-on control, passive-off control and semi-active control, and strains gathered at the bottom of the steel columns were used as feedbacks to build the semi-active controller. For each control type, the control efficacy on structural response and damage was verified for the El Centro, Taft and Tianjin earthquake with specified peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.2g, 0.4g, 0.9g and 1.2g respectively. The test results show that (1) it is feasible to control the seismic response of the steel–concrete hybrid structure using MR dampers; (2) structure with semi-active control and passive-on control perform better in the shaking table test considering the maximum inter-story drift, displacement time history and energy dissipation capacity, compared to uncontrolled structure and structure with passive-off control; (3) there is also more structural damage in the passive-off and uncontrolled cases, proving the effectiveness of MR dampers in damage control. In addition, an inverse calculation method for strain is proposed to effectively utilize the strains measured during the shaking table test to obtain the stress and material damage process at measured positions, using damage model of the steel and concrete material.

[1]  Nicholas Fisco,et al.  Smart structures: Part I—Active and semi-active control , 2011 .

[2]  B. F. Spencer,et al.  STATE OF THE ART OF STRUCTURAL CONTROL , 2003 .

[3]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  GA-optimized fuzzy logic control of a large-scale building for seismic loads , 2008 .

[4]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review , 1999 .

[5]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Semi-active control of a torsionally-responsive structure , 2009 .

[6]  Jinxiong Zhou,et al.  Experimental study of the semi‐active control of building structures using the shaking table , 2003 .

[7]  Wolfgang Brocks,et al.  Simulation of failure under cyclic plastic loading by damage models , 2006 .

[8]  Osamu Yoshida,et al.  Experimental verification of torsional response control of asymmetric buildings using MR dampers , 2003 .

[9]  Zheng Li,et al.  Seismic damage analysis of RC structures using fiber beam-column elements , 2012 .

[10]  Antonio Occhiuzzi,et al.  Experimental analysis of magnetorheological dampers for structural control , 2003 .

[11]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[12]  Osamu Yoshida,et al.  Seismic Control of a Nonlinear Benchmark Building using Smart Dampers , 2004 .

[13]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Neuro-control of cable vibration using semi-active magneto-rheological dampers , 2002 .

[14]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the- practice , 2002 .

[15]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Seismic Damage Indices for Concrete Structures: A State-of-the-Art Review , 1995 .

[16]  Osamu Yoshida,et al.  Response Control of Full-Scale Irregular Buildings Using Magnetorheological Dampers , 2005 .

[17]  Nicola Bonora,et al.  A nonlinear CDM model for ductile failure , 1997 .

[18]  N. Wongprasert,et al.  Application of a genetic algorithm for optimal damper distribution within the nonlinear seismic benchmark building , 2004 .