Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses

In four experiments, we compared the effects of delay, probability, and monetary amount on the subjective value of gains and losses. For delayed gains, smaller amounts were discounted more steeply than larger amounts, whereas the opposite pattern was observed with probabilistic gains. For both delayed and probabilistic losses, however, amount had much smaller and less reliable effects on discounting. Taken together, the pattern of differential magnitude effects leads to delayed gains’ being discounted significantly more steeply than delayed losses, but only at smaller amounts, whereas probabilistic gains are discounted significantly more steeply than probabilistic losses, but only at larger amounts. Even though the same hyperbola-like function described both individual and group discounting of delayed and probabilistic gains and losses, the present findings suggest that different processes are involved in discounting positive and negative outcomes. Raw data may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.

[1]  M. Sidman A note on functional relations obtained from group data. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  W. Estes The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Estes Wk The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956 .

[4]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[5]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Preferences for Deferred Losses , 1975 .

[6]  D. Commerce Statistical abstract of the United States , 1978 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[9]  R. Thaler Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency , 1981 .

[10]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Cognition and behavior in studies of choice , 1986 .

[11]  M. K. Stevenson,et al.  A Discounting Model for Decisions With Delayed Positive or Negative Outcomes , 1986 .

[12]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1987 .

[13]  J. E. Mazur An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[14]  M. Commons The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value , 2013 .

[15]  U. Ben-Zion,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1989 .

[16]  R. Thaler,et al.  Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice , 1989 .

[17]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Decision making over time and under uncertainty: a common approach , 1991 .

[18]  D. Cross,et al.  Subjective probability and delay. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  G. Ainslie Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person , 1992 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[21]  George Loewenstein,et al.  The fall and rise of psychological explanations in the economics of intertemporal choice. , 1992 .

[22]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation , 1992 .

[23]  H. Rachlin,et al.  The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities , 1993 .

[24]  D. Cross,et al.  Lotteries and the Time Horizon , 1994 .

[25]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison , 1994 .

[26]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[27]  K. Kirby,et al.  Modeling Myopic Decisions: Evidence for Hyperbolic Delay-Discounting within Subjects and Amounts , 1995 .

[28]  A. Elstein,et al.  Valuing the Future , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[29]  G. Chapman Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Exponential Versus Hyperbolic Discounting of Delayed Outcomes: Risk and Waiting Time , 1996 .

[31]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting , 1997 .

[32]  K. Kirby,et al.  Bidding on the Future: Evidence Against Normative Discounting of Delayed Rewards , 1997 .

[33]  L. Green,et al.  Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  L Green,et al.  Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Reliability of a Measure of Temporal Discounting , 2000 .

[37]  C. Starmer Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk , 2000 .

[38]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  DELAYED REWARD AND COST DISCOUNTING , 2001 .

[39]  L. Green,et al.  Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. , 2001, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[40]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Discounting Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards , 2002 .

[41]  Matthew W. Johnson,et al.  Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. , 2003, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[42]  Daniel D. Holt,et al.  Discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards: Processes and traits , 2003 .

[43]  Daniel D. Holt,et al.  Is discounting impulsive? Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[44]  L. Green,et al.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[46]  Shanefrederick,et al.  Time Discounting and Time Preference : A Critical Review , 2022 .