Sex Differences in Interaction and Achievement in Cooperative Small Groups

This study investigated sex differences in interaction patterns and achievement in small groups. Seventy-seven students in two junior high school mathematics classes worked for 2 weeks in majority-female, majority-male, or groups with equal numbers of males and females. Same-sex and cross-sex interactions were analyzed for six interaction variables: giving, asking for, and receiving explanations; and giving, asking for, and receiving procedural information. Achievement and interaction results related to the ratio of females to males in a group. Females and males showed equal achievement and similar interaction patterns in groups with equal numbers of females and males. In majority-female groups, females directed most of their interaction to males and showed lower achievement than males. In majority-male groups, males tended to ignore females and showed somewhat higher achievement than did females. Explanations for these results and consequences for group composition in the classroom are discussed. The growing literature on cooperative learning in the classroom presents a consistent feature across the designs of studies: Nearly all studies use mixed-sex groups. Yet, little is known about the processes operating in mixed-sex groups in the classroom nor how these processes relate to achievement. Research on group dynamics in noneducational settings has consistently shown that males dominate the activity in mixed-sex groups (e.g., Borgatta & Stimson, 1963; Heilbrun, 1968; Strodtbeck, James & Hawkins, 1957; Strodtbeck & Mann, 1956). In a review of the recent literature on mixed-sex groups, Lockheed (in press) performed a meta-analysis of studies using collaborative tasks. Of 64 datasets that Lockheed examined, 45 showed greater male

[1]  Elizabeth G. Cohen,et al.  Modification of Interracial Interaction Disability: An Application of Status Characteristic Theory , 1972 .

[2]  C. Wolman,et al.  The solo woman in a professional peer group. , 1975, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[3]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  The Relationship of Student Ability and Small-Group Interaction to Student Achievement , 1982 .

[4]  E. Cohen Modifying the Effects of Social Structure , 1973 .

[5]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Stability of Small Group Interaction and Achievement Over Time. , 1984 .

[6]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Ability × Treatment Interaction Effects on Children's Learning in Large-group and Small-group Approaches , 1981 .

[7]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction , 1972 .

[8]  E. Borgatta,et al.  Sex differences in interaction characteristics. , 1963, The Journal of social psychology.

[9]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement and Related Factors: A Further Study. , 1978 .

[10]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Group Interaction and Achievement in Small Groups: Stability Over Time , 1983 .

[11]  Marlaine E. Lockheed,et al.  Conceptualizing Sex as a Status Characteristic: Applications to Leadership Training Strategies , 1976 .

[12]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. , 1982 .

[13]  A. Heilbrun Influence of Observer and Target Sex in Judgments of Sex-Typed Attributes , 1968 .

[14]  E. Fennema,et al.  Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization and Affective Factors , 1977 .

[15]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  The Study of Mathematics By High School Girls and Boys: Related Variables , 1977 .

[16]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Individual Characteristics and Children's Learning in Large-Group and Small-Group Approaches: Study II. Report from the Project on Studies of Instructional Programming for the Individual Student. , 1979 .

[17]  L. Fox,et al.  The Effects of Sex Role Socialization on Mathematics Participation and Achievement. , 1976 .

[18]  N. Webb Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. , 1982 .

[19]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF GROUP INTERACTION AND MATHEMATICAL ERRORS IN HETEROGENEOUS ABILITY GROUPS , 1980 .

[20]  D. Broverman,et al.  Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal , 1972 .

[21]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Sex Role Differentiation in Jury Deliberations , 1956 .

[22]  Marlaine E. Lockheed Cognitive Style Effects on Sex Status in Student Work Groups. , 1977 .

[23]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Social Status in Jury Deliberations , 1957 .

[24]  A. Katcher,et al.  The Qualities of Leadership: How Male Medical Students Evaluate Their Female Peers , 1977 .

[25]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  A process‐outcome analysis of learning in group and individual settings , 1980 .

[26]  The Center for Interracial Cooperation: A Field Experiment. , 1976 .

[27]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program , 1981 .

[28]  N. Webb Predicting learning from student interaction: Defining the interaction variables , 1983 .

[29]  H. N. Mischel Sex Bias in the Evaluation of Professional Achievements. , 1974 .