Fear conditioning in virtual reality contexts: a new tool for the study of anxiety

BACKGROUND Context conditioning has been suggested to model clinical anxiety, but context, as manipulated in animal models, has not been translated to human studies. A virtual environment might prove to be the ideal tool for innovative experimental paradigms to study explicitly cued fear and contextual anxiety in humans. METHODS Subjects were guided through a virtual environment that consisted of two rooms connected by a street scene. In each of the rooms, a blue and a yellow panel on a wall served as explicit conditioned stimuli (CS). The panels were displayed several times. One of the panels (CS+) was associated with a shock in one of the rooms (shock room). No shock was administered in the other room (safe room). Acoustic startle stimuli were administered in the presence and in the absence of the panels to assess explicit cued conditioning to the CS and context conditioning to the rooms, respectively. RESULTS Startle was potentiated by the CS+ in both rooms, which suggests generalization of fear across contexts. After acquisition, startle was potentiated in the shock room, compared with the safe room, in the absence of the CS+. CONCLUSIONS These results support the future use of virtual reality to design new conditioning experiments to study both fear and anxiety.

[1]  E. Maguire,et al.  Methods for developmental studies of fear conditioning circuitry , 2001, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  J. Gugten,et al.  Light-enhanced and fear-potentiated startle: temporal characteristics and effects of α-helical corticotropin-releasing hormone , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[3]  E. Maguire,et al.  Neurodevelopmental Aspects of Spatial Navigation: A Virtual Reality fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[4]  Michael Davis,et al.  Role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis versus the amygdala in fear, stress, and anxiety. , 2003, European journal of pharmacology.

[5]  Michael Davis,et al.  Fear-potentiated startle: A neural and pharmacological analysis , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  C. A. Morgan,et al.  Benzodiazepines have no effect on fear-potentiated startle in humans , 2002, Psychopharmacology.

[7]  N. A. Marlin Contextual associations in trace conditioning , 1981 .

[8]  S. Mineka,et al.  The role of cognitive biases in the origins and maintenance of fear and anxiety disorders , 1989 .

[9]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[10]  M. Bouton Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[11]  C. Grillon,et al.  Fear-potentiated startle conditioning in humans: explicit and contextual cue conditioning following paired versus unpaired training. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  Christian Grillon,et al.  A review of the modulation of the startle reflex by affective states and its application in psychiatry , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  P. Holland,et al.  Hippocampus and context in classical conditioning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  Michael Davis,et al.  Are different parts of the extended amygdala involved in fear versus anxiety? , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  K Merikangas,et al.  Fear-potentiated startle in humans: effects of anticipatory anxiety on the acoustic blink reflex. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[17]  C. Grillon Associative learning deficits increase symptoms of anxiety in humans , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[18]  Michael Davis,et al.  Double Dissociation between the Involvement of the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis and the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala in Startle Increases Produced by Conditioned versus Unconditioned Fear , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.