Seasonality, weather and climate affect home range size in roe deer across a wide latitudinal gradient within Europe.

1. Because many large mammal species have wide geographical ranges, spatially distant populations may be confronted with different sets of environmental conditions. Investigating how home range (HR) size varies across environmental gradients should yield a better understanding of the factors affecting large mammal ecology. 2. We evaluated how HR size of a large herbivore, the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), varies in relation to seasonality, latitude (climate), weather, plant productivity and landscape features across its geographical range in Western Europe. As roe deer are income breeders, expected to adjust HR size continuously to temporal variation in food resources and energetic requirements, our baseline prediction was for HR size to decrease with proxies of resource availability. 3. We used GPS locations of roe deer collected from seven study sites (EURODEER collaborative project) to estimate fixed-kernel HR size at weekly and monthly temporal scales. We performed an unusually comprehensive analysis of variation in HR size among and within populations over time across the geographical range of a single species using generalized additive mixed models and linear mixed models, respectively. 4. Among populations, HR size decreased with increasing values for proxies of forage abundance, but increased with increases in seasonality, stochastic variation of temperature, latitude and snow cover. Within populations, roe deer HR size varied over time in relation to seasonality and proxies of forage abundance in a consistent way across the seven populations. Thus, our findings were broadly consistent across the distributional range of this species, demonstrating a strong and ubiquitous link between the amplitude and timing of environmental seasonality and HR size at the continental scale. 5. Overall, the variability in average HR size of roe deer across Europe reflects the interaction among local weather, climate and seasonality, providing valuable insight into the limiting factors affecting this large herbivore under contrasting conditions. The complexity of the relationships suggests that predicting ranging behaviour of large herbivores in relation to current and future climate change will require detailed knowledge not only about predicted increases in temperature, but also how this interacts with factors such as day length and climate predictability.

[1]  B. McNab,et al.  Bioenergetics and the Determination of Home Range Size , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[2]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[3]  K. Parker,et al.  Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk , 1984 .

[4]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[5]  Paul Beier,et al.  Factors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat use. , 1990 .

[6]  P. Abrams Life History and the Relationship Between Food Availability and Foraging Effort , 1991 .

[7]  Arild O. Gautestad,et al.  Physical and biological mechanisms in animal movement processes , 1993 .

[8]  D. Lawlor Photosynthesis, productivity and environment , 1995 .

[9]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid : the roe deer , 1996 .

[10]  R. Bergström,et al.  Size of winter home range of roe deer Capreolus capreolus in two forest areas with artificial feeding in Sweden , 1996, Wildlife Biology.

[11]  K. Schmidt,et al.  Home Ranges of Wolves in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland, Compared with Other Eurasian Populations , 1998 .

[12]  F. Messier,et al.  Determinants of Home Range Size for Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus). , 1999, Ecology letters.

[13]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach , 2001 .

[14]  P. McLoughlin,et al.  A hierarchical pattern of limiting factors helps explain variation in home range size , 2000 .

[15]  John G. Kie,et al.  LANDSCAPE HETEROGENEITY AT DIFFERING SCALES: EFFECTS ON SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MULE DEER , 2002 .

[16]  S. Ferguson The effects of productivity and seasonality on life history: comparing age at maturity among moose (Alces alces) populations , 2002 .

[17]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[18]  S. Schneider,et al.  Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants , 2003, Nature.

[19]  O. Liberg,et al.  Experimental evidence for density-dependence of home-range size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.): a comparison of two long-term studies , 2004, Oecologia.

[20]  F. Messier,et al.  Intraspecific Variation in Home Range Overlap with Habitat Quality: A Comparison among Brown Bear Populations , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[21]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Can intra-specific variation in carnivore home-range size be explained using remote-sensing estimates of environmental productivity? , 2005 .

[23]  S. Saïd,et al.  The Influence of Landscape Structure on Female Roe Deer Home-range Size , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Spatial analysis of global urban extent from DMSP-OLS night lights , 2005 .

[25]  Erlend B. Nilsen,et al.  Prey density, environmental productivity and home-range size in the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) , 2005 .

[26]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  D. Maillard,et al.  Reintroduction of roe deer Capreolus capreolus into a Mediterranean habitat: female mortality and dispersion , 2005 .

[28]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[29]  Sandro Lovari,et al.  Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[30]  S. Wood Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R , 2006 .

[31]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Does seasonality explain the evolution and maintenance of delayed implantation in the family Mustelidae (Mammalia: Carnivora)? , 2006 .

[32]  Tim Coulson,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Identify Spatiotemporal and Individual‐Level Determinants of Animal Home Range Size , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[33]  W. Bradshaw,et al.  Evolution of Animal Photoperiodism , 2007 .

[34]  F. Bunnell,et al.  Home Range and Body Weight-- A Reevaluation , 2007 .

[35]  Panel Intergubernamental sobre Cambio Climático Climate change 2007: Synthesis report , 2007 .

[36]  O Gimenez,et al.  Assessing the impact of climate variation on survival in vertebrate populations , 2008, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[37]  R. Pachauri Climate change 2007. Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report , 2008 .

[38]  Jonathan Wright Foraging: Behavior and Ecology, David W. Stephens, Joel S. Brown, Ronald C. Ydenberg (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2007), Pp. xiii+608. Price £23.50 paperback , 2008 .

[39]  J. Fryxell,et al.  Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[40]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[41]  S. Ciuti,et al.  Anti-predator behaviour, space use and habitat selection in female roe deer during the fawning season in a wolf area , 2008 .

[42]  B. Sæther,et al.  Winter habitat–space use in a large arctic herbivore facing contrasting forage abundance , 2009, Polar Biology.

[43]  D. Pontier,et al.  Assessing the performance of NDVI as a proxy for plant biomass using non-linear models: a case study on the Kerguelen archipelago , 2009, Polar Biology.

[44]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Are local weather, NDVI and NAO consistent determinants of red deer weight across three contrasting European countries? , 2009 .

[45]  Nicolas Morellet,et al.  The Effect of Capture on Ranging Behaviour and Activity of the European Roe Deer Capreolus capreolus , 2009 .

[46]  Kurt C. VerCauteren,et al.  Regional assessment on influence of landscape configuration and connectivity on range size of white-tailed deer , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[47]  M. Huston,et al.  The global distribution of net primary production: resolving the paradox , 2009 .

[48]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  H. Schielzeth Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients , 2010 .

[50]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Icing events trigger range displacement in a high-arctic ungulate. , 2010, Ecology.

[51]  A. Elmore,et al.  Climate change and cattle nutritional stress , 2010 .

[52]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  How does local weather predict red deer home range size at different temporal scales? , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[54]  Kees van Oers,et al.  Phenology, seasonal timing and circannual rhythms: towards a unified framework , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  S. Ciuti,et al.  Effects of hunting with hounds on a non-target species living on the edge of a protected area , 2011 .

[56]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Landscape complexity and spatial scale influence the relationship between remotely sensed spectral diversity and survey-based plant species richness , 2011 .

[57]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI): unforeseen successes in animal ecology , 2011 .

[58]  I. Minder Local and seasonal variations of roe deer diet in relation to food resource availability in a Mediterranean environment , 2011, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[59]  Floris M. van Beest,et al.  What determines variation in home range size across spatiotemporal scales in a large browsing herbivore? , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[60]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Partial migration in roe deer: migratory and resident tactics are end points of a behavioural gradient determined by ecological factors , 2011 .

[61]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .