Neural-network quantum state tomography

The experimental realization of increasingly complex synthetic quantum systems calls for the development of general theoretical methods to validate and fully exploit quantum resources. Quantum state tomography (QST) aims to reconstruct the full quantum state from simple measurements, and therefore provides a key tool to obtain reliable analytics1–3. However, exact brute-force approaches to QST place a high demand on computational resources, making them unfeasible for anything except small systems4,5. Here we show how machine learning techniques can be used to perform QST of highly entangled states with more than a hundred qubits, to a high degree of accuracy. We demonstrate that machine learning allows one to reconstruct traditionally challenging many-body quantities—such as the entanglement entropy—from simple, experimentally accessible measurements. This approach can benefit existing and future generations of devices ranging from quantum computers to ultracold-atom quantum simulators6–8.Unsupervised machine learning techniques can efficiently perform quantum state tomography of large, highly entangled states with high accuracy, and allow the reconstruction of many-body quantities from simple experimentally accessible measurements.

[1]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Experimental Ten-Photon Entanglement. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[2]  Vogel,et al.  Determination of quasiprobability distributions in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[3]  Dong-Ling Deng,et al.  Machine Learning Topological States , 2016, 1609.09060.

[4]  Giacomo Torlai,et al.  Neural Decoder for Topological Codes. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[5]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[6]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Natural Gradient Works Efficiently in Learning , 1998, Neural Computation.

[7]  D. Gross,et al.  Efficient quantum state tomography. , 2010, Nature communications.

[8]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks , 2016, Science.

[9]  S. Huber,et al.  Learning phase transitions by confusion , 2016, Nature Physics.

[10]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  Machine learning phases of matter , 2016, Nature Physics.

[11]  J. Dalibard,et al.  Many-Body Physics with Ultracold Gases , 2007, 0704.3011.

[12]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Quantum annealing with manufactured spins , 2011, Nature.

[13]  M. Greiner,et al.  Probing the Superfluid–to–Mott Insulator Transition at the Single-Atom Level , 2010, Science.

[14]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  Learning Thermodynamics with Boltzmann Machines , 2016, ArXiv.

[15]  Alexey V. Gorshkov,et al.  Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions , 2014, Nature.

[16]  S. Sorella GREEN FUNCTION MONTE CARLO WITH STOCHASTIC RECONFIGURATION , 1998, cond-mat/9803107.

[17]  R. Blatt,et al.  Quantum simulations with trapped ions , 2011, Nature Physics.

[18]  C. F. Roos,et al.  Efficient tomography of a quantum many-body system , 2016, Nature Physics.

[19]  A. Yacoby,et al.  Demonstration of Entanglement of Electrostatically Coupled Singlet-Triplet Qubits , 2012, Science.

[20]  Geoffrey E. Hinton Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence , 2002, Neural Computation.

[21]  D. Deng,et al.  Quantum Entanglement in Neural Network States , 2017, 1701.04844.

[22]  Leonhardt Quantum-state tomography and discrete Wigner function. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[23]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks , 2006, Science.

[24]  Stephen Becker,et al.  Quantum state tomography via compressed sensing. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[25]  C. Schwemmer,et al.  Permutationally invariant quantum tomography. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[26]  M. Rispoli,et al.  Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system , 2015, Nature.

[27]  Andrew G. White,et al.  Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization , 1999, quant-ph/9908081.

[28]  F. Becca Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems , 2017 .

[29]  Lu-Ming Duan,et al.  Efficient representation of quantum many-body states with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature Communications.

[30]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[31]  Lei Wang,et al.  Discovering phase transitions with unsupervised learning , 2016, 1606.00318.

[32]  Matthew B Hastings,et al.  Measuring Renyi entanglement entropy in quantum Monte Carlo simulations. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[33]  O. Gühne,et al.  03 21 7 2 3 M ar 2 00 6 Scalable multi-particle entanglement of trapped ions , 2006 .

[34]  J. Chen,et al.  Equivalence of restricted Boltzmann machines and tensor network states , 2017, 1701.04831.

[35]  Yichen Huang,et al.  Neural Network Representation of Tensor Network and Chiral States. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[36]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states , 2006, quant-ph/0609130.