Linear and Nonlinear Rheology of Living Cells

Living cells are an active soft material with fascinating mechanical properties. Under mechanical loading, cells exhibit creep and stress relaxation behavior that follows a power-law response rather than a classical exponential response. Such a response puts cells in the context of soft colloidal glasses and other disordered metastable materials that share the same properties. In cells, however, both the power-law exponent and stiffness are related to the contractile prestress in the cytoskeleton. In addition, cells are made of a highly nonlinear material that stiffens and fluidizes under mechanical stress. They show active and adaptive mechanical behavior such as contraction and remodeling that sets them apart from any other nonliving material. Strikingly, all these observations can be linked by simple relationships with the power-law exponent as the only organizing parameter. Current theoretical models capture specific facets of cell mechanical behavior, but a comprehensive understanding is still emerging.

[1]  D Stamenović,et al.  The role of prestress and architecture of the cytoskeleton and deformability of cytoskeletal filaments in mechanics of adherent cells: a quantitative analysis. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  P. Janmey,et al.  Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[3]  A. Bausch,et al.  Transient binding and dissipation in cross-linked actin networks. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[4]  Jens Glaser,et al.  Glass transition and rheological redundancy in F-actin solutions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  P. Onck,et al.  Three-dimensional cross-linked F-actin networks: relation between network architecture and mechanical behavior. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[6]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  P. Janmey,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[9]  G. B. The Dynamical Theory of Gases , 1916, Nature.

[10]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[11]  D A Weitz,et al.  Two-point microrheology of inhomogeneous soft materials. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[12]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Rat airway smooth muscle cell during actin modulation: rheology and glassy dynamics. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[13]  D A Weitz,et al.  Actin filament length tunes elasticity of flexibly cross-linked actin networks. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Christine Ortiz,et al.  Nanomechanics of the Cartilage Extracellular Matrix. , 2011, Annual review of materials research.

[15]  W. Weber Ueber die Elasticität der Seidenfäden , 1835 .

[16]  Ben Fabry,et al.  High-force magnetic tweezers with force feedback for biological applications. , 2007, The Review of scientific instruments.

[17]  Andreas R. Bausch,et al.  A bottom-up approach to cell mechanics , 2006 .

[18]  B. Nebe,et al.  Mechanical Stressing of Integrin Receptors Induces Enhanced Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Cytoskeletally Anchored Proteins* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Mapping the cytoskeletal prestress. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[20]  C. Broedersz,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity of composite networks of stiff biopolymers with flexible linkers. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[21]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Implications of heterogeneous bead behavior on cell mechanical properties measured with magnetic twisting cytometry , 1999 .

[22]  Francis Crick,et al.  The physical properties of cytoplasm: A study by means of the magnetic particle method Part I. Experimental , 1950 .

[23]  Sylvie Wendling-Mansuy,et al.  Frequency response of a viscoelastic tensegrity model: Structural rearrangement contribution to cell dynamics. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Muscles, Reflexes, and Locomotion , 1984 .

[25]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Fast and slow dynamics of the cytoskeleton , 2006, Nature materials.

[26]  D A Weitz,et al.  Stress-dependent elasticity of composite actin networks as a model for cell behavior. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[27]  P. Janmey,et al.  Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[28]  A. Huxley Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[29]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[30]  Levine,et al.  One- and two-particle microrheology , 2000, Physical review letters.

[31]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[32]  B. Fabry,et al.  Fluctuations of cytoskeleton-bound microbeads—the effect of bead–receptor binding dynamics , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[33]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[34]  Albrecht Ott,et al.  Rheological properties of the Eukaryotic cell cytoskeleton , 2007 .

[35]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Nonequilibrium Mechanics of Active Cytoskeletal Networks , 2007, Science.

[36]  Jeffrey J. Fredberg,et al.  Universality in cell mechanics , 2008 .

[37]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Linearity and time-scale invariance of the creep function in living cells , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[38]  Miroslav Zivkovic,et al.  A finite element model of cell deformation during magnetic bead twisting. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[39]  Ning Wang,et al.  Rheology of airway smooth muscle cells is associated with cytoskeletal contractile stress. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[40]  Dimitrije Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. II. Contribution of microtubules. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[41]  Y. Fung Elasticity of soft tissues in simple elongation. , 1967, The American journal of physiology.

[42]  Linhong Deng,et al.  Universal physical responses to stretch in the living cell , 2007, Nature.

[43]  Rony Granek,et al.  From Semi-Flexible Polymers to Membranes: Anomalous Diffusion and Reptation , 1997 .

[44]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Conserved microtubule–actin interactions in cell movement and morphogenesis , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[45]  J. Hildebrandt Comparison of mathematical models for cat lung and viscoelastic balloon derived by Laplace transform methods from pressure-volume data. , 1969, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[46]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[47]  F. Kohlrausch Beiträge zur Kenntniss der elastischen Nachwirkung , 1866 .

[48]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Mechano-Coupling and Regulation of Contractility by the Vinculin Tail Domain , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Active soft glassy rheology of adherent cells , 2009 .

[50]  J. Howard,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2001 .

[51]  D. Ingber,et al.  Impaired mechanical stability, migration and contractile capacity in vimentin-deficient fibroblasts. , 1998, Journal of cell science.

[52]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Linhong Deng,et al.  Localized mechanical stress induces time-dependent actin cytoskeletal remodeling and stiffening in cultured airway smooth muscle cells. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[54]  B. Fabry,et al.  Nonlinear viscoelasticity of adherent cells is controlled by cytoskeletal tension , 2011 .

[55]  T van Dillen,et al.  Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[56]  Takaharu Okajima,et al.  The number distribution of complex shear modulus of single cells measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2009, Ultramicroscopy.

[57]  D. Ingber,et al.  A Computational Tensegrity Model Predicts Dynamic Rheological Behaviors in Living Cells , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[58]  Brenton D. Hoffman,et al.  The consensus mechanics of cultured mammalian cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Time scale and other invariants of integrative mechanical behavior in living cells. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[60]  D. Navajas,et al.  Scaling the microrheology of living cells. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[61]  D A Weitz,et al.  Scaling of F-actin network rheology to probe single filament elasticity and dynamics. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[62]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[63]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Intracellular stress tomography reveals stress focusing and structural anisotropy in cytoskeleton of living cells. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[64]  D. Mccormick Sequence the Human Genome , 1986, Bio/Technology.

[65]  Pablo Fernández,et al.  Single cell mechanics: stress stiffening and kinematic hardening. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[66]  Daniel Isabey,et al.  Partitioning of Cortical and Deep Cytoskeleton Responses from Transient Magnetic Bead Twisting , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[67]  G. Plopper,et al.  Rapid induction and isolation of focal adhesion complexes. , 1993, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[68]  A. Huxley,et al.  Proposed Mechanism of Force Generation in Striated Muscle , 1971, Nature.

[69]  D. Ingber Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. , 1997, Annual review of physiology.

[70]  R. Skalak,et al.  Passive mechanical properties of human leukocytes. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[71]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Cytoskeleton dynamics: fluctuations within the network. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[73]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[74]  M. Sato [Mechanical properties of living tissues]. , 1986, Iyo denshi to seitai kogaku. Japanese journal of medical electronics and biological engineering.

[75]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Stiff polymers, foams, and fiber networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[76]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Ligand binding regulates the directed movement of β1 integrins on fibroblasts , 1996, Nature.

[77]  Cees W J Oomens,et al.  Linear viscoelastic behavior of subcutaneous adipose tissue. , 2008, Biorheology.

[78]  P Vezin,et al.  A strain-hardening bi-power law for the nonlinear behaviour of biological soft tissues. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[79]  David A Weitz,et al.  The cell as a material. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[80]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Dynamics of prestressed semiflexible polymer chains as a model of cell rheology. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[81]  D E Ingber,et al.  Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[82]  J. Simeon,et al.  Creep function of a single living cell. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[83]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Cytoskeletal remodelling and slow dynamics in the living cell , 2005, Nature materials.

[84]  Alex J Levine,et al.  Filamin cross-linked semiflexible networks: fragility under strain. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[85]  D Stamenović,et al.  Contribution of intermediate filaments to cell stiffness, stiffening, and growth. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[86]  D. Weitz,et al.  Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks , 2004, Science.

[87]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Integrin-cytoskeletal interactions in migrating fibroblasts are dynamic, asymmetric, and regulated , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[88]  D E Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. , 1993, Science.

[89]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Rheological behavior of living cells is timescale-dependent. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[90]  D Lerche,et al.  The mechanical properties of actin gels. Elastic modulus and filament motions. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[91]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Deformation of cross-linked semiflexible polymer networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[92]  T C Lubensky,et al.  Microrheology, stress fluctuations, and active behavior of living cells. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[93]  Power laws in microrheology experiments on living cells: Comparative analysis and modeling. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[94]  K. Luby-Phelps,et al.  Physical properties of cytoplasm. , 1994, Current opinion in cell biology.

[95]  Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials , 1997, cond-mat/9712001.

[96]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Airway smooth muscle, tidal stretches, and dynamically determined contractile states. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[97]  D A Weitz,et al.  Filamin A is essential for active cell stiffening but not passive stiffening under external force. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[98]  Tanmay Lele,et al.  Actomyosin tension exerted on the nucleus through nesprin-1 connections influences endothelial cell adhesion, migration, and cyclic strain-induced reorientation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[99]  D. Weitz,et al.  An active biopolymer network controlled by molecular motors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[100]  Jeffrey J. Fredberg,et al.  Reinforcement versus Fluidization in Cytoskeletal Mechanoresponsiveness , 2009, PloS one.

[101]  Ning Wang,et al.  Cytoskeletal mechanics in adherent human airway smooth muscle cells: probe specificity and scaling of protein-protein dynamics. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[102]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Dynamic shear modulus of a semiflexible polymer network , 1998 .

[103]  Peter Sollich,et al.  Rheology of Soft Glassy Materials , 1996, cond-mat/9611228.

[104]  J. Crocker,et al.  Fragility and mechanosensing in a thermalized cytoskeleton model with forced protein unfolding. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[105]  Peter Grütter,et al.  Probing the viscoelastic behavior of cultured airway smooth muscle cells with atomic force microscopy: stiffening induced by contractile agonist. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[106]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Rheological behavior of mammalian cells , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[107]  Pablo Fernandez,et al.  Inelastic mechanics of sticky biopolymer networks , 2010, 1001.0907.

[108]  D A Weitz,et al.  Prestressed F-actin networks cross-linked by hinged filamins replicate mechanical properties of cells. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[109]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Mechanics of living cells measured by laser tracking microrheology. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[110]  Pablo Fernández,et al.  A master relation defines the nonlinear viscoelasticity of single fibroblasts. , 2006, Biophysical journal.