Development of geopolymer mortar under ambient temperature for in situ applications

Abstract Geopolymer concrete technology involves production of more environmentally friendly waste material-based concrete which could be a viable solution for conventional concrete replacement. Typical fly ash-based geopolymer concrete however requires high temperature curing treatment in order to develop sufficient early strength properties, which is considered a severe limitation for cast-in-place concrete applications. Most previous studies on geopolymer concrete have focused on the properties of concretes pre-hardened by heat curing and/or by aggressive chemical treatment (e.g. alkali activation using concentrated sodium hydroxide (NaOH)). The current study presents an extensive experimental investigation on the mechanical and microstructural properties of geopolymer concrete mixes prepared with a combination of fly ash and slag cured under ambient temperature. ‘User friendly’ geopolymer mixes were produced using fly ash (FA) and Ground Granulated Blast furnace Slag (GGBS) mixed together with potassium silicate with molar ratio equal to 1.2 (as the activator) and water. The results indicated that heat curing treatment can be avoided by partial replacement of fly ash with slag. The compressive strength of the examined mixes was found to be in the range of 40–50 MPa for 40% and 50% GGBS replacement mixtures respectively. Moreover, the flexural and direct tensile strengths of geopolymer mixes are considerably improved as the GGBS content is increased. Based on FTIR and SEM/EDS analysis, the inclusion of a higher content of GGBS resulted in a denser structure by formation of more hydration products.

[1]  S. K. Nath,et al.  Influence of iron making slags on strength and microstructure of fly ash geopolymer , 2013 .

[2]  Warren A. Dick,et al.  Alkali-activated complex binders from class C fly ash and Ca-containing admixtures. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[3]  Ran Huang,et al.  Binding mechanism and properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortars , 2013 .

[4]  Nataša Marjanović,et al.  Physical–mechanical and microstructural properties of alkali-activated fly ash–blast furnace slag blends , 2015 .

[5]  Jay G. Sanjayan,et al.  Effect of different superplasticizers and activator combinations on workability and strength of fly ash based geopolymer , 2014 .

[6]  H. Lee,et al.  Fresh and hardened properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes with superplasticizers , 2014 .

[7]  Chai Jaturapitakkul,et al.  NaOH-activated ground fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature , 2011 .

[8]  Oğuzhan Keleştemur,et al.  Corrosion behavior of reinforcing steel embedded in concrete produced with finely ground pumice and silica fume , 2010 .

[9]  Gökhan Görhan,et al.  The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures , 2014 .

[10]  Kyung-Taek Koh,et al.  The mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline activators , 2013 .

[11]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  THE EFFECT OF COMPOSITION AND TEMPERATURE ON THE PROPERTIES OF FLY ASH- AND KAOLINITE -BASED GEOPOLYMERS , 2002 .

[12]  E. Gartner Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements ☆ , 2004 .

[13]  T. Bakharev,et al.  Geopolymeric materials prepared using Class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing , 2005 .

[14]  Mohamed Saafi,et al.  Multifunctional properties of carbon nanotube/fly ash geopolymer nanocomposites , 2013 .

[15]  H. Lee,et al.  Reactivity and reaction products of alkali-activated, fly ash/slag paste , 2015 .

[16]  Center-Point Loading,et al.  Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam With , 2002 .

[17]  A. Rashad A comprehensive overview about the influence of different admixtures and additives on the properties of alkali-activated fly ash , 2014 .

[18]  X. Querol,et al.  Coal fly ash-slag-based geopolymers: microstructure and metal leaching. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  H. Lee,et al.  Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete manufactured at room temperature , 2013 .

[20]  J. Deventer,et al.  Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art , 2007 .

[21]  Mingkai Zhou,et al.  Magnesia modification of alkali-activated slag fly ash cement , 2011 .

[22]  F. Collins,et al.  Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete , 2013 .

[23]  Brian H. O'Connor,et al.  Chemical optimisation of the compressive strength of aluminosilicate geopolymers synthesised by sodium silicate activation of metakaolinite , 2003 .

[24]  S. Al-Otaibi,et al.  Durability of concrete incorporating GGBS activated by water-glass , 2008 .

[25]  Alaa M. Rashad,et al.  A comprehensive overview about the effect of nano-SiO2 on some properties of traditional cementitious materials and alkali-activated fly ash , 2014 .

[26]  C. Atiş,et al.  Effect of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and fly ash addition on the strength properties of lightweight mortars containing waste PET aggregates , 2011 .

[27]  X. Shi,et al.  Mechanical properties and microstructure analysis of fly ash geopolymeric recycled concrete. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  J. Davidovits Geopolymer chemistry and applications , 2008 .

[29]  Prabir Sarker,et al.  Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition , 2014 .

[30]  Z. Baščarević,et al.  Mechanical and microstructural properties of alkali-activated fly ash geopolymers. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[31]  G. Mathew,et al.  Influence of aggregate content on the behavior of fly ash based geopolymer concrete , 2012 .

[32]  B. Vijaya Rangan,et al.  Low-Calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: Long-term properties , 2006 .

[33]  Hjh Jos Brouwers,et al.  Development of an eco-friendly Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) with efficient cement and mineral admixtures uses , 2015 .

[34]  Salih Yazicioglu,et al.  The influence of compaction pores on sorptivity and carbonation of concrete , 2007 .

[35]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[36]  Salim Barbhuiya,et al.  Properties of fly ash concrete modified with hydrated lime and silica fume , 2009 .

[37]  Mohd Zamin Jumaat,et al.  The development of compressive strength of ground granulated blast furnace slag-palm oil fuel ash-fly ash based geopolymer mortar , 2014 .

[38]  J. Deventer,et al.  Modification of phase evolution in alkali-activated blast furnace slag by the incorporation of fly ash , 2014 .

[39]  Pradip Nath,et al.  The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature , 2014 .

[40]  Mahyuddin Ramli,et al.  An overview on the influence of various factors on the properties of geopolymer concrete derived from industrial by-products , 2015 .

[41]  O. Kayali,et al.  Effect of initial water content and curing moisture conditions on the development of fly ash-based geopolymers in heat and ambient temperature , 2014 .

[42]  John L. Provis,et al.  Microscopy and microanalysis of inorganic polymer cements. 1: remnant fly ash particles , 2009, Journal of Materials Science.