Evaluating VANET routing in urban environments

Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) are a class of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) incorporated into moving vehicles. Nodes communicate with both and infrastructure to provide Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for the purpose of improving safety and comfort. Efficient and adaptive routing protocols are essential for achieving reliable and scalable network performance. However, routing in VANETs is challenging due to the high-speed movement of vehicles, which results in frequent network topology changes. This paper provides an in-depth evaluation of three well-known MANET routing protocols, AODV, OLSR and GPSR, in VANET with urban environment setup. We compare their performance using three metrics: drop burst length (DBL), delay and delivery ratio (PDR). The simulations are carried out using NS2 and SUMO simulators platforms, with scenarios configured to reflect real-world conditions. The results show that OLSR is able to achieve a shorter DBL and demonstrates higher PDR performance comparing to AODV and GPSR under low network load. However, with GPSR, the network shows more stable PDR under medium and high network load. In term of delay it is outperformed by GPSR, which delivers packets with the shortest delay.

[1]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Performance Comparison of OLSR and AODV Protocols in a VANET Crossroad Scenario , 2013, ITCS.

[2]  Daniel Krajzewicz,et al.  SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility An Overview , 2011 .

[3]  Pooja Rani,et al.  Performance Comparison of VANET Routing Protocols , 2011, 2011 7th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[4]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Data communication in VANETs: Protocols, applications and challenges , 2016, Ad Hoc Networks.

[5]  C. Rama Krishna,et al.  Scenario Based Performance Analysis of AODV and GPSR Routing Protocols in a VANET , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology.

[6]  Imran Khan,et al.  Performance evaluation of AODV and OLSR in highly fading vehicular ad hoc network environments , 2009, 2009 IEEE 13th International Multitopic Conference.

[7]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[8]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocol in VANET with Vehicle-Node Density , 2010, 2010 6th International Conference on Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM).

[9]  Jérôme Haerri,et al.  Performance comparison of AODV and OLSR in VANETs urban environments under realistic mobility patterns , 2006 .

[10]  A. Laouiti,et al.  Optimized link state routing protocol for ad hoc networks , 2001, Proceedings. IEEE International Multi Topic Conference, 2001. IEEE INMIC 2001. Technology for the 21st Century..

[11]  M. Nakagami The m-Distribution—A General Formula of Intensity Distribution of Rapid Fading , 1960 .

[12]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETS): status, results, and challenges , 2010, Telecommunication Systems.

[13]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[14]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Performance Evaluation of AODV, OLSR and DYMO Protocols for Vehicular Networks Using CAVENET , 2010, 2010 13th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems.

[15]  仲上 稔,et al.  The m-Distribution As the General Formula of Intensity Distribution of Rapid Fading , 1957 .