Comparing principal autonomy in time and space: modelling school leaders’ decision making and control

ABSTRACT This article presents the development and application of a model that can be utilized to compare the autonomy of principals in various historical and national contexts. Drawing on former conceptual work on autonomy in education, the model conceptualizes principal autonomy as two-dimensional. The first dimension is the decision making expected from principals, manifested on a continuum of being restricted or extended. The second dimension is the control imposed on principals, also varying between a restricted or an extended nature. In relation to each other, restricted/extended decision making and control can result in four different governance configurations that impact principals’ work complexities. We apply the model for the description of the development of Swedish principals’ work conditions over time and for a comparison of the autonomy of Nordic principals. With this endeavour, we demonstrate how historical and nation-specific particularities in educational governance interact with limitations and opportunities of educational leadership. Moreover, we argue that a focus on the autonomy of various stakeholders in schools might be a fertile strategy for further understanding the confusing concept of school autonomy.

[1]  T. S. Prøitz,et al.  Curriculum policy and instructional planning: Teachers’ autonomy across various school contexts , 2022, European Educational Research Journal.

[2]  Wieland Wermke,et al.  The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe , 2021 .

[3]  Wieland Wermke,et al.  Decision-making in Context: Swedish and Finnish Teachers’ Perceptions of Autonomy , 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research.

[4]  Philipp Mayring.  Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse , 2019, Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie.

[5]  Craig Skerritt.  Inside the Autonomous School: Making Sense of a Global Educational Trend , 2019, British Journal of Educational Studies.

[6]  Amanda Heffernan.  Power and the ‘autonomous’ principal: autonomy, teacher development, and school leaders’ work , 2018, Journal of Educational Administration and History.

[7]  A. Neeleman.  The scope of school autonomy in practice: An empirically based classification of school interventions , 2018, Journal of Educational Change.

[8]  Eva Magnusson.  Vad händer i själva verket? : Om styrning och handlingsutrymme i Skolverket under åren 1991–2014 , 2018 .

[9]  M. Ainscow,et al.  Inside the Autonomous School: Making Sense of a Global Educational Trend , 2017 .

[10]  Petter Aasen,et al.  Making and re-making the Nordic model of education , 2017 .

[11]  Eva Forsberg,et al.  The changing nature of autonomy: Transformations of the late Swedish teaching profession , 2017 .

[12]  K. Kumpulainen,et al.  School autonomy, leadership and student achievement: reflections from Finland , 2016 .

[13]  Y. Cheng,et al.  The development of school autonomy and accountability in Hong Kong: Multiple changes in governance, work, curriculum, and learning , 2016 .

[14]  Y. Cheng,et al.  School autonomy, leadership and learning: a reconceptualisation , 2016 .

[15]  L. Lundahl.  Emptying local education governance of education , 2016 .

[16]  Olof Johansson,et al.  När nationell policy möter lokala genomförandearenor : Rapport med fakta och kommentarer från ett VR-finansierat forskningsprojekt 2009-2015 , 2016 .

[17]  Barbara Mayer,et al.  Visible Learning For Teachers Maximizing Impact On Learning , 2016 .

[18]  Mark Priestley,et al.  Teacher Agency : What Is It and Why Does It Matter? , 2015 .

[19]  Gemma Parker.  Teachers' Autonomy , 2015 .

[20]  Maija Salokangas,et al.  The evaluation and steering of English academy schools through inspection and examinations: national visions and local practices , 2015 .

[21]  U. Lundström.  Systematic quality work in Swedish schools : intentions and dilemmas , 2015 .

[22]  Wieland Wermke,et al.  Autonomy in education: theoretical and empirical approaches to a contested concept , 2015 .

[23]  Magnus Frostenson.  Three forms of professional autonomy: de-professionalisation of teachers in a new light , 2015 .

[24]  Michael Uljens.  Curriculum work as educational leadership – paradoxes and theoretical foundations , 2015 .

[25]  M. Heinrich.  Metamorphoses of pedagogical autonomy in German school reforms: continuities, discontinuities and synchronicities illustrated by empirical studies on school development planning, school profiling and school inspection1 , 2015 .

[26]  Sølvi Mausethagen,et al.  Shifts in curriculum control: contesting ideas of teacher autonomy , 2015 .

[27]  Maria Jarl,et al.  Skolpolitik: från riksdagshus till klassrum , 2015 .

[28]  Wieland Wermke,et al.  Contextualizing Teacher Autonomy in time and space: a model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession , 2014 .

[29]  E. Forsberg.  Styrningen av den obligatoriska skolan : mellan stabilitet och förändring , 2014 .

[30]  Joakim Lindgren,et al.  Skolinspektion som styrning , 2014 .

[31]  Sofia Persson,et al.  NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC EDUCATION: A CATALYST FOR THE PROFESSIONALIZATION OF SWEDISH SCHOOL PRINCIPALS , 2012 .

[32]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Does School Autonomy Make Sense Everywhere? Panel Estimates from PISA , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[33]  Niklas Stenlås.  Läraryrket mellan autonomi och statliga reformideologier , 2011 .

[34]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[35]  Gabriella C. Gonzalez,et al.  Improving School Leadership , 2009 .

[36]  Sharon Gewirtz,et al.  Unpacking Autonomy and Control in Education: Some Conceptual and Normative Groundwork for a Comparative Analysis , 2007 .

[37]  R. Vanderstraeten.  Professions in organizations, professional work in education , 2007 .

[38]  Stefan Hopmann,et al.  Restrained Teaching: The Common Core of Didaktik , 2007 .

[39]  O. Johansson,et al.  Ethical Dilemmas of Swedish School Leaders , 2007 .

[40]  S. Kuoppa,et al.  A Matter of Self-Governance and Control , 2007 .

[41]  J. Wilches.  Teacher Autonomy: A Critical Review of the Research and Concept beyond Applied Linguistics , 2007, Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura.

[42]  R. Ingersoll.  Who Controls Teachers' Work? , 2006 .

[43]  Petter Aasen,et al.  The Nordic Model in Education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years , 2006 .

[44]  Thomas A. E. Fuchs,et al.  What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[45]  Luiz Carlos Bresser-Pereira.  The Social-Democratic State , 2004 .

[46]  John Doyle,et al.  Who Controls Teachers’ Work? Power and Accountability in America’s Schools , 2004 .

[47]  L. Lundahl.  A Matter of Self-Governance and Control The Reconstruction of Swedish Education Policy: 1980-2003 , 2005 .

[48]  Lars Norén,et al.  Valfrihet till varje pris - om design av kundvalsmarknader inom skola och omsorg , 2003 .

[49]  R. Vanderstraeten.  The Autonomy of Communication and the Structure of Education , 2001 .

[50]  O. Johansson.  School Leadership Training in Sweden: perspectives for tomorrow , 2001 .

[51]  Mats Ekholm,et al.  Forskning om rektor - en forskningsöversikt , 2000 .

[52]  S. Hopmann.  The Curriculum as a Standard of Public Education , 1999 .

[53]  Bo Rothstein,et al.  The social democratic state : the Swedish model and the bureaucratic problem of social reforms , 1997 .

[54]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Teachers' decision-making power and school conflict , 1996 .

[55]  Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson,et al.  Skolan och det nya verket. Skildringar från styrningens och utvärderingarnas tidevarv , 1995 .

[56]  N. Luhmann,et al.  Ecological communication: Coping with the unknown , 1993 .

[57]  Brian J. Caldwell,et al.  Leading the self-managing school , 1992 .

[58]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[59]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Autonomy , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[60]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .