Reciprocal modulation of internal and external factors determines individual movements.

Movement is fundamental to individual and population dynamics, as it allows individuals to meet their basic requirements. Although movement patterns reflect interactions between internal and external factors, only few studies have examined the effects of these factors on movement simultaneously, and they generally focused on particular biological contexts (e.g. dispersal, foraging). However, the relative importance of these factors in driving individual routine movements might reflect a species' potential flexibility to cope with landscape changes and therefore buffer their potential impact on fitness. We used data from GPS collars on Scandinavian brown bears to investigate the relative role of these factors, as well as an additional factor (period of the year) on routine movements at two spatial scales (hourly and daily relocations). As expected, internal factors played a major role in driving movement, compared to external factors at both scales, but its relative importance was greater at a finer scale. In particular, the interaction between reproductive status and period of the year was one of the most influential variables, females being constrained by the movement capacity of their cubs in the first periods of the year. The effect of human disturbance on movement was also greater for females with cubs than for lone females. This study showed how reciprocal modulation of internal and external factors is shaping space use of brown bears. We stress that these factors should be studied simultaneously to avoid the risk of obtaining context-dependent inferences. Moreover, the study of their relative contribution is also highly relevant in the context of multiple-use landscapes, as human activities generally affect the landscape more than they affect the internal states of an individual. Species or individuals with important internal constraints should be less responsive to changes in their environment as they have less freedom from internal constraints and should thus be more sensitive to human alteration of the landscape, as shown for females with cubs in this study.

[1]  A. Zedrosser,et al.  The mating system of the brown bear Ursus arctos , 2012 .

[2]  D. Allainé,et al.  Coping with human disturbance: spatial and temporal tactics of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) , 2010 .

[3]  María del Mar Delgado,et al.  The effect of phenotypic traits and external cues on natal dispersal movements. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[4]  A. Houston,et al.  Capital breeding and income breeding: their meaning, measurement, and worth. , 2009, Ecology.

[5]  Stéphane Dray,et al.  The concept of animals' trajectories from a data analysis perspective , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[6]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  E. Revilla,et al.  Trends and missing parts in the study of movement ecology , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  Movement ecology: size-specific behavioral response of an invasive snail to food availability. , 2008, Ecology.

[9]  D. Allainé,et al.  Importance of movement constraints in habitat selection studies , 2008 .

[10]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  State-space models of individual animal movement. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes , 2007 .

[12]  A. Zedrosser,et al.  Should I stay or should I go? Natal dispersal in the brown bear , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  G. Cederlund,et al.  Predation on Moose Calves by European Brown Bears , 2007 .

[14]  Alan Y. Chiang,et al.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With R , 2007, Technometrics.

[15]  J. Swenson,et al.  Terrain use by an expanding brown bear population in relation to age, recreational resorts and human settlements , 2007 .

[16]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error , 2007 .

[17]  J. Swenson,et al.  Importance of diel behaviour when studying habitat selection : examples from female Scandinavian brown bears (Ursus arctos) , 2007 .

[18]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[19]  P. Kaczensky,et al.  Activity patterns of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Slovenia and Croatia , 2006 .

[20]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Mating Strategies in Relation to Sexually Selected Infanticide in a Non‐Social Carnivore: the Brown Bear , 2006 .

[21]  S. Wood.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R , 2006 .

[22]  Jerald B. Johnson,et al.  Model selection in ecology and evolution. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Jon E Swenson,et al.  Seasonal range size in relation to reproductive strategies in brown bears Ursus arctos. , 2003, The Journal of animal ecology.

[24]  J. Swenson,et al.  FAMILY BREAKUP IN BROWN BEARS: ARE YOUNG FORCED TO LEAVE? , 2003 .

[25]  T. Reimchen,et al.  Nocturnal and diurnal foraging behaviour of brown bears (Ursus arctos) on a salmon stream in coastal British Columbia , 2002 .

[26]  Francisco Palomares,et al.  Spatial organization, group living and ecological correlates in low‐density populations of Eurasian badgers, Meles meles , 2002 .

[27]  J. Swenson,et al.  The diet of the brown bear Ursus arctos in the Pasvik Valley, northeastern Norway , 2001, Wildlife Biology.

[28]  F. Messier,et al.  Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors , 2000 .

[29]  M. Bhaskara Rao,et al.  Model Selection and Inference , 2000, Technometrics.

[30]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Factors affecting maternal care in an income breeder, the European roe deer , 2000 .

[31]  Stefan Sperlich,et al.  Generalized Additive Models , 2014 .

[32]  J. Swenson,et al.  Bears and ants: myrmecophagy by brown bears in central Scandinavia , 1999 .

[33]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  ASSESSING THE RISK OF EXTINCTION FOR THE BROWN BEAR (URSUS ARCTOS) IN THE CORDILLERA CANTABRICA, SPAIN , 1998 .

[34]  J. Swenson,et al.  The diet of brown bears Ursus arctos in central Scandinavia: effect of access to free-ranging domestic sheep Ovis aries , 1998, Wildlife Biology.

[35]  P. Turchin.  Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[36]  J. Swenson,et al.  Infanticide caused by hunting of male bears , 1997, Nature.

[37]  K. I. Jönsson,et al.  Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction , 1997 .