Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time

AbstractIn a series of three separate experiments, we studied two different orientation illusions, in both of which vertical lines appear tilted as a result of being set against a tilted background pattern. The ‘simultaneous tilt illusion’ (STI), in which a target grating is viewed within an abutting tilted grating surround, is thought to originate early in the cortical processing of visual contours. In contrast, the ‘rod-and-frame’ illusion (RFI), which is induced by a distant tilted frame, is thought to originate much later in the perceptual processing system. In the first two experiments we found that orientationguided action was virtually impervious to the RFI, whereas both perceptual experience and action were equally influenced by the STI. In the third experiment, in which the two illusions were pitted one against the other, an opposite pattern of effects emerged, such that visuomotor performance was now deceived by the illusion much more than was perceptual experience. This pattern of association and dissociation in the effects of visual illusions on perception versus action can best be explained within a two-visual-systems model of cortical processing.

[1]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Characteristics of surround inhibition in cat area 17 , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  C Casco,et al.  Spatial filtering and spatial primitives in early vision: an explanation of the Zöllner–Judd class of geometrical illusion , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  I Rock,et al.  The rod-and-frame effect as a function of the righting of the frame. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Melvyn A Goodale,et al.  Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action , 2000, Vision Research.

[8]  M. Perenin,et al.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  Grasping after a Delay Shifts Size-Scaling from Absolute to Relative Metrics , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Glover,et al.  The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[11]  S. Chieffi,et al.  Visual illusion and action , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[14]  A. Milner,et al.  Neuropsychological studies of perception and visuomotor control. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  S. Jackson,et al.  The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  D. Perrett,et al.  The Nature and Limits of Orientation and Pattern Processing Supporting Visuomotor Control in a Visual Form Agnosic , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[18]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  K. Murphy,et al.  The perception of spatial relations in a patient with visual form agnosia. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[20]  D. Carey,et al.  Do action systems resist visual illusions? , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  D. Goodenough,et al.  Eye torsion in response to a tilted visual stimulus , 1979, Vision Research.

[22]  Peter Dixon,et al.  Motor adaptation to an optical illusion , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[24]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Long-range horizontal connections and their role in cortical reorganization revealed by optical recording of cat primary visual cortex , 1995, Nature.

[26]  P. Dixon,et al.  Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[28]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[29]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Eye position tunes the contribution of allocentric and egocentric information to target localization in human goal-directed arm movements , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.