The resource footprint of biobased products: a key issue in the sustainable development of biorefineries

The multifunctionality of bioresources is a major opportunity for the future; it offers the ability to replace fossil-related market demands in a carbon neutral way. However, the switchover to a biobased economy faces two main challenges in comparison with the current fossil-based situation: biofeedstock requires an intensive cultivation step and furthermore there is a certain competition with the food chain which limits the amount of land available for new markets. So whilst biomass is seen as a ‘renewable’ resource, it is definitely not ‘gratuite’, inducing the need of an efficient cultivation and valorization. In this paper, a case study is executed to highlight that biorefining feedstock into a wide range of products is a thermodynamically efficient (81.1%) way of processing all molecules of the bioresources for specific purposes in different segments of the market demand. On the other hand, it is demonstrated in the second part of the paper that replacing fossils requires a certain amount of inputs from the Earth's crust causing additional thermodynamic losses in the production chain (15.3% efficient), which are quantified based on the resource footprint of the Cumulative Exergy Extracted from the Natural Environment (CEENE) methodology. A scenario assessment demonstrates the resulting tradeoff between the carbon footprint of bioproducts and the land, water, and minerals footprint; in the case study executed, 27% fossil resources are saved at the cost of 93% extra land, water and mineral input from the natural environment. © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

[1]  J Dewulf,et al.  Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Walter Youngquist,et al.  The Post-Petroleum Paradigm—and Population , 1999 .

[3]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material for: Ethanol Can Contribute To Energy and Environmental Goals , 2006 .

[4]  Patricia Krawczak,et al.  Thermosetting (bio)materials derived from renewable resources: A critical review , 2010 .

[5]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  W. Parton,et al.  Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. , 1997, Science.

[7]  James R. Bolton,et al.  THE MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS * , 1991 .

[8]  J. W. Ponton,et al.  Biofuels: Thermodynamic sense and nonsense , 2009 .

[9]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Cascade utilization of biomass: strategies for a more efficient use of a scarce resource , 2000 .

[10]  Adam J. Liska,et al.  Food and fuel for all: realistic or foolish? , 2007 .

[11]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  GHG balances of bioenergy systems – Overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns , 2010 .

[12]  Stijn Bruers,et al.  Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  L. Reijnders Conditions for the sustainability of biomass based fuel use , 2006 .

[14]  Wilhelm Warta,et al.  Solar cell efficiency tables (version 29) , 2007 .