Towards a simple indicator of water stress in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) based on the differential sensitivities of vegetative growth components

Responses of grapevine vegetative growth components to mild, medium and severe soil water deficits were used to identify simple and sensitive indicators for early diagnosis of water stress. Soil water deficit was characterised as the fraction of transpirable soil water (FTSW) remaining in a water-depleted rootzone. Growth components included the number of emerged leaves on first (Ist) and second (IInd) order lateral branches, the leaf area and internode length of each phytomer of Ist order lateral branches, and the frequency of IInd order lateral branching. These components were measured in a greenhouse on Shiraz (syn. Syrah) grapevines, over a 38-day period of stabilised soil water regimes. Leaf emergence rate, final leaf area and final internode length of lateral branches I were relatively insensitive to mild and medium water deficits. They only decreased in response to severe water deficits. The frequency of IInd order lateral branching showed a similar trend, but was inhibited at severe water deficits. The leaf emergence rate of lateral branches II was highly sensitive to FTSW, and decreased even in response to mild water deficits. Because measurement of leaf emergence rate is a time consuming process, further analysis of the data was undertaken to identify a simpler but similarly effective indicator of cumulative water deficit. Accordingly, we established that the final length of lateral branches I was sensitive to medium water deficits, while the final ratio of the number of leaves on lateral branches II to the number of leaves on lateral branches I, was sensitive to even mild water deficits. Both of these composite indicators (derived variables) were relatively easy to measure and showed potential as early indicators of water deficits. They were more sensitive to FTSW than was predawn leaf water potential. Moreover, the final ratio of the number of leaves on lateral branches II to the number of leaves on lateral branches I was even more sensitive to FTSW than was stomatal conductance.

[1]  H. Schultz,et al.  Vegetative Growth Distribution During Water Deficits in Vitis vinifera L , 1988 .

[2]  S. Lavee,et al.  Effect of Grapevine Training Systems on Development of Powdery Mildew , 2001, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[3]  Cornelis van Leeuwen,et al.  Stem Water Potential is a Sensitive Indicator of Grapevine Water Status , 2001 .

[4]  Hans R. Schultz,et al.  Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near‐isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field‐grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought , 2003 .

[5]  N. Ollat,et al.  Carbon isotope composition of sugars in grapevine, an integrated indicator of vineyard water status. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[6]  Stephen R. Martin,et al.  Shoot growth on de-fruited grapevines: a physiological indicator for irrigation scheduling , 2000 .

[7]  G. Seguin,et al.  Effect of the water supply to vines, determined by measuring leaf water potential, on vegetative development and the ripening of the grape (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Franc, Saint-Emilion 1990) , 1994 .

[8]  Vincent Dumas,et al.  Modelling the seasonal dynamics of the soil water balance of vineyards. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[9]  Peter R. Dry,et al.  Factors influencing grapevine vigour and the potential for control with partial rootzone drying , 1998 .

[10]  J. A. Considine,et al.  Response of Grapes to Water-Deficit Stress in Particular Stages of Development , 1976, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[11]  Y. Glories,et al.  Influence of water status on vine vegetative growth, berry ripening, and wine characteristics in Mediterranean zone (example of Nemea, Greece, variety Saint-George, 1997) , 1999 .

[12]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Field Pea Transpiration and Leaf Growth in Response to Soil Water Deficits , 1996 .

[13]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Sensitivity of soybean leaf development to water deficits , 1988 .

[14]  Rate of leaf production in response to soil water deficits in field pea , 1998 .

[15]  Sylvia Dayau,et al.  Significance and limits in the use of predawn leaf water potential for tree irrigation , 1999, Plant and Soil.

[16]  E. Fereres,et al.  Plant indicators for scheduling irrigation of young olive trees , 2002, Irrigation Science.

[17]  Jc Miller,et al.  Dry Matter Partitioning and Vegetative Growth of Young Peach Trees Under Water Stress , 1990 .

[18]  Marco Bindi,et al.  Influence of Water Deficit Stress on Leaf Area Development and Transpiration of Sangiovese Grapevines Grown in Pots , 2005, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[19]  H. Jones.  Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[20]  J. Marois,et al.  Control of Botrytis bunch rot of grape with canopy management , 1987 .

[21]  Francois Tardieu,et al.  Shoot development in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) is affected by the modular branching pattern of the stem and intra- and inter-shoot trophic competition. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[22]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Expansion of pea leaves subjected to short water deficit: cell number and cell size are sensitive to stress at different periods of leaf development , 1995 .

[23]  T. Hsiao.  Plant Responses to Water Stress , 1973 .

[24]  P. B. Lombard,et al.  Environmental and Management Practices Affecting Grape Composition and Wine Quality - A Review , 1993, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[25]  J. Flexas,et al.  Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): An open gate to improve water-use efficiency? , 2005 .

[26]  A. Soltani,et al.  Thresholds for chickpea leaf expansion and transpiration response to soil water deficit , 2000 .

[27]  A. Pellegrino,et al.  Relationships between plant and soil water status in vine (Vitis vinifera L.) , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[28]  P. Dry,et al.  Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.