A spatial coherence-based vision-free brain-computer interface using auditory selective attention

INTRODUCTION: The development of Brain Computer Interfaces based on Auditory Selective Attention allows patients unable to voluntarily control eye movement to interact with the interface, because such systems are independent of vision. An alternative technique suitable for Brain Computer Interface applications is Spatial Coherence, an objective method to detect the side where a subject is focusing attention. This method takes into consideration the Coherence Function and the topographic distribution of responses between EEG electrodes. In this work, we further study the Information Transfer Rate and the effects of overlapping windows in the calculations. The idea behind the overlapping is to decrease the duration of the test in order to augment the Information Transfer Rate. METHOD: EEG signals were collected from fourteen adult men aged between 19 and 28 years. Amplitude-modulated tones were used for stimulation, with 32 and 38 Hz modulation and 500 and 2000 Hz carrier frequencies, on the left and right ears, respectively. Spatial coherence was used in an online Brain Computer Interface system using auditory steady-state responses modulated by Auditory Selective Attention. RESULTS: The obtained hit rates and the Information Transfer Rate may be considered appropriate, with a maximum value of 82% and 1.89 bits/min. The better detector regarding sensitivity versus specificity can be obtained by using a 50% overlap between consecutive data windows. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the Spatial Coherence successfully detected the focus of attention, and it seemed useful as a classifier of the attention condition for vision-free Brain Computer Interface.

[1]  Ko-ichiro Miyamoto,et al.  A brain-computer interface (BCI) system based on auditory stream segregation , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  D. G. Watts,et al.  Spectral analysis and its applications , 1968 .

[4]  Héctor Pomares,et al.  Evidences of cognitive effects over auditory steady-state responses by means of artificial neural networks and its use in brain-computer interfaces , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[5]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state evoked potentials during selective attention. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[7]  Márcio Flávio Dutra Moraes,et al.  Avoiding spectral leakage in objective detection of auditory steady-state evoked responses in the inferior colliculus of rat using coherence , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  R A Dobie,et al.  Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  A vision-free brain-computer interface (BCI) paradigm based on auditory selective attention , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  Classification of selective attention to auditory stimuli: Toward vision-free brain–computer interfacing , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  T. Picton,et al.  The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[12]  C. Neuper,et al.  Toward a high-throughput auditory P300-based brain–computer interface , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  J Pernier,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans. , 2000, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[14]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Optimal electrode selection for multi-channel electroencephalogram based detection of auditory steady-state responses. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  An Auditory Paradigm for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2004, NIPS.

[16]  A spatial approach of magnitude-squared coherence applied to selective attention detection , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[18]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Information transfer rate in a five-classes brain-computer interface , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  B. Blankertz,et al.  A New Auditory Multi-Class Brain-Computer Interface Paradigm: Spatial Hearing as an Informative Cue , 2010, PloS one.