Topology Optimization using a Topology Description Function Approach

During the last two decades, computational structural optimization methods have emerged, as computational power increased tremendously. Designers now have topological optimization routines at their disposal. These routines are able to generate the entire geometry of structures, provided only with information on loads, supports, and space to work in. The most common way to do this is to partition the available space in elements, and to determine the material content of each of the elements separately. This thesis presents a different approach, namely the \emph{Topological Description Function} (TDF) approach. The TDF is a function parametrized by design variables. The function determines a geometry using a level-set approach. A finite element representation of the geometry then is used to determine how well the geometry performs with respect to objective and constraints. This information is given to an optimization program, which has the purpose of finding an optimal combination of values for the design variables. This approach decouples the geometry description of the design from the evaluation, allowing the designer to tune the detailedness of the geometry and the computational grid separately as wished. In this thesis, the concept of a TDF is explained in detail. Using a genetic algorithm for the optimization turns out to be too computationally expensive, however, it shows the validity of the TDF as a geometry description method. A method based on an intuitive updating scheme shows that the TDF approach can be used to do topology optimization.

[1]  Vassili Toropov,et al.  NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION USING ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT AND MULTIPOINT APPROXIMATIONS , 1997 .

[2]  Jan Sokolowski,et al.  On the Topological Derivative in Shape Optimization , 1999 .

[3]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[4]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab , 2001 .

[5]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Topology optimization: a tool for the tailoring of structures and materials , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Evolutionary Structural Optimization , 1997 .

[7]  Vassili Toropov Multipoint approximation method in optimization problems with expensive function values , 1992 .

[8]  F. van Keulen,et al.  Gradient-enhanced response surface building , 2004 .

[9]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Evolutionary structural optimisation (ESO) using a bidirectional algorithm , 1998 .

[10]  R. Haftka,et al.  Review of options for structural design sensitivity analysis. Part 1: Linear systems , 2005 .

[11]  Y. Xie,et al.  Evolutionary structural optimisation using an additive algorithm , 2000 .

[12]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Topology Optimization Using Iterative Continuum-Type Optimality Criteria (COC) Methods for Discretized Systems , 1993 .

[13]  G. Rozvany Exact analytical solutions for some popular benchmark problems in topology optimization , 1998 .

[14]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Topology Optimization , 1997 .