Hybrid deep neural network based prediction method for unsteady flows with moving boundary

A novel hybrid deep neural network architecture is designed to capture the spatial-temporal features of unsteady flows around moving boundaries directly from high-dimensional unsteady flow fields data. The hybrid deep neural network is constituted by the convolutional neural network (CNN), improved convolutional Long-Short Term Memory neural network (ConvLSTM) and deconvolutional neural network (DeCNN). Flow fields at future time step can be predicted through flow fields by previous time steps and boundary positions at those steps by the novel hybrid deep neural network. Unsteady wake flows around a forced oscillation cylinder with various amplitudes are calculated to establish the datasets as training samples for training the hybrid deep neural networks. The trained hybrid deep neural networks are then tested by predicting the unsteady flow fields around a forced oscillation cylinder with new amplitude. The effect of neural network structure parameters on prediction accuracy was analyzed. The hybrid deep neural network, constituted by the best parameter combination, is used to predict the flow fields in the future time. The predicted flow fields are in good agreement with those calculated directly by computational fluid dynamic solver, which means that this kind of deep neural network can capture accurate spatial-temporal information from the spatial-temporal series of unsteady flows around moving boundaries. The result shows the potential capability of this kind novel hybrid deep neural network in flow control for vibrating cylinder, where the fast calculation of high-dimensional nonlinear unsteady flow around moving boundaries is needed.

[1]  E. de Langre,et al.  Coupling of Structure and Wake Oscillators in Vortex-Induced Vibrations , 2004 .

[2]  Peter J. Schmid,et al.  Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition , 2012, 1309.4165.

[3]  J. Templeton,et al.  Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance , 2016, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  P. Schmid,et al.  Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Xin Chen,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Model Reduction for Distributed Parameter Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[6]  L. Chatellier,et al.  A few techniques to improve data-driven reduced-order simulations for unsteady flows , 2020 .

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[8]  Yixing Wang,et al.  A novel spatial-temporal prediction method for unsteady wake flows based on hybrid deep neural network , 2019 .

[9]  T. P. Miyanawala,et al.  A Hybrid Data-driven Deep Learning Technique for Fluid-Structure Interaction , 2018 .

[10]  Turgut Sarpkaya,et al.  A critical review of the intrinsic nature of vortex-induced vibrations , 2004 .

[11]  Prakash Vedula,et al.  Subgrid modelling for two-dimensional turbulence using neural networks , 2018, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Noriyasu Omata,et al.  A novel method of low-dimensional representation for temporal behavior of flow fields using deep autoencoder , 2019, AIP Advances.

[13]  Takaaki Murata,et al.  Data-Driven Reduced Order Modeling of Flows Around Two-Dimensional Bluff Bodies of Various Shapes , 2019, Volume 2: Computational Fluid Dynamics.

[14]  Xi-yun Lu,et al.  Dynamic performance and wake structure of flapping plates with different shapes , 2014 .

[15]  Traian Iliescu,et al.  A non-intrusive reduced order modeling framework for quasi-geostrophic turbulence , 2019, Physical review. E.

[16]  Donghyun You,et al.  Data-driven prediction of unsteady flow over a circular cylinder using deep learning , 2018, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Clarence W. Rowley,et al.  Dynamic mode decomposition for large and streaming datasets , 2014, 1406.7187.

[18]  L. Agostini Exploration and prediction of fluid dynamical systems using auto-encoder technology , 2020 .

[19]  Koji Fukagata,et al.  Synthetic turbulent inflow generator using machine learning , 2018, Physical Review Fluids.

[20]  S. Atluri,et al.  A numerical investigation of the near-wake structure in the variable frequency forced oscillation of a circular cylinder , 2009 .

[21]  Omer San,et al.  Memory embedded non-intrusive reduced order modeling of non-ergodic flows , 2019 .

[22]  C. Xie,et al.  Artificial neural network mixed model for large eddy simulation of compressible isotropic turbulence , 2019, Physics of Fluids.

[23]  Jinlong Wu,et al.  Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework , 2018, Physical Review Fluids.

[24]  Shashank Srivastava,et al.  Machine Learning Surrogates for Predicting Response of an Aero-Structural-Sloshing System , 2019, ArXiv.

[25]  Koji Fukagata,et al.  Machine-learning-based reduced-order modeling for unsteady flows around bluff bodies of various shapes , 2020, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics.

[26]  S. Pawar,et al.  A deep learning enabler for nonintrusive reduced order modeling of fluid flows , 2019, Physics of Fluids.

[27]  Omer San,et al.  Long short-term memory embedded nudging schemes for nonlinear data assimilation of geophysical flows , 2020 .

[28]  A. Mohan,et al.  Compressed Convolutional LSTM: An Efficient Deep Learning framework to Model High Fidelity 3D Turbulence , 2019, 1903.00033.

[29]  Qiang Zhou,et al.  Structural dynamic reanalysis method for transonic aeroelastic analysis with global structural modifications , 2017 .

[30]  Juan Du,et al.  Non-linear Petrov-Galerkin methods for reduced order hyperbolic equations and discontinuous finite element methods , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[31]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[32]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[33]  Time-resolved turbulent velocity field reconstruction using a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based artificial intelligence framework , 2019, Physics of Fluids.

[34]  Gang Chen,et al.  Efficient aeroelastic reduced order model with global structural modifications , 2018 .