A Comparison of Actual and Artifactual Features Based on Fractal Analyses: Resting-State MEG Data

Future standardized system for distinguishing actual and artifactual magnetoencephalogram (MEG) data is an essential tool. In this paper, we proposed the quantitative parameters based on fractal dimension (FD) analyses in which the FD may convey different features before and after artifact removal. The six FD algorithms based on time-series computation, namely, box-counting method (BCM), variance fractal dimension (VFD), Higuchi’s method (HM), Kazt’s method (KM), detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), and modified zero-crossing rate (MZCR) were compared. These approaches measure nonlinear-behavioral responses in the resting-state MEG data. Experimental results showed that the FD value of actual MEG was increased statistically in comparison with the artifactual MEG. The DFA and the HM present a best performance for analyzing simulated data and resting-state MEG data, respectively.

[1]  Yasuhiro Haruta,et al.  Lateralized Theta Wave Connectivity and Language Performance in 2- to 5-Year-Old Children , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  A Signal-Processing Pipeline for Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Networks , 2011, Brain Connect..

[3]  K. Torre,et al.  Fractal analyses for 'short' time series: A re-assessment of classical methods , 2006 .

[4]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Improving MEG source localizations: An automated method for complete artifact removal based on independent component analysis , 2008, NeuroImage.

[5]  Montri Phothisonothai,et al.  Linear and nonlinear features for automatic artifacts removal from MEG data based on ICA , 2012, Proceedings of The 2012 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference.

[6]  C. Stam,et al.  Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: Review of an emerging field , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  B. Mandelbrot Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[8]  T. Higuchi Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory , 1988 .

[9]  Masahiro Nakagawa,et al.  A study of time-dependent fractal dimensions of vocal sounds , 1995 .

[10]  José L. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic artifact identification and automatic removal based on independent component analysis and categorization approaches , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Spectral and Nonlinear Analyses of MEG Background Activity in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  M. J. Katz,et al.  Fractals and the analysis of waveforms. , 1988, Computers in biology and medicine.

[13]  Montri Phothisonothai,et al.  Fractal-based EEG data analysis of body parts movement imagery tasks. , 2007, The journal of physiological sciences : JPS.

[14]  M. Nakagawa,et al.  A Complexity Measure Based on Modified Zero-Crossing Rate Function for Biomedical Signal Processing , 2009 .

[15]  C. Peng,et al.  Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.