Differential sensitivity to pitch distance, particularly in speech.

The fundamental frequency in speech shows many rapid variations, part of which determine the perceived shape of the pitch contour. This implies that the accuracy with which listeners perceive changes of F0 is more relevant to understanding the perception of intonation than the traditional just noticeable difference of F0 in speech. This study examines the sensitivity to differences in the amount of change of F0, upward (Experiment Ia) and downward (Experiment Ib). Subjects 74 and 104, respectively, with widely different musical ability can be divided into three categories: (1) Quite a number of them were not able to discriminate differences of less than 4 semitones (nondiscriminators); (2) other subjects wrongly tried to base their judgments on a simple comparison of the final pitches of a stimulus pair (final pitch discriminators); (3) the remaining subjects (pitch distance discriminators) yielded average jnd's of about 1.5 to 2 semitones. Since the issue is associated with musical interval sense, similar experiments were carried out using piano tones. The results were essentially the same as with the speech stimuli. The outcome suggests that only differences of more than 3 semitones play a part in communicative situations.

[1]  I. Pollack The Information of Elementary Auditory Displays , 1952 .

[2]  J. Hart,et al.  Intonation by rule: a perceptual quest , 1973 .

[3]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The Relation of Pitch to Frequency: A Revised Scale , 1940 .

[4]  A. Bachem,et al.  Various Types of Absolute Pitch , 1937 .

[5]  J. 't Hart,et al.  Discriminability of the size of pitch movements in speech , 1974 .

[6]  J. Breckenridge The declination effect , 1977 .

[7]  F. Attneave,et al.  Pitch as a medium: a new approach to psychophysical scaling. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[8]  M. Rossi,et al.  Le seuil de glissando ou seuil de perception des variations tonales pour les sons de la parole , 1971 .

[9]  J. T. Hart,et al.  Integrating different levels of intonation analysis , 1975 .

[10]  Claes Witting A Method of Evaluating Listeners' Transcriptions of Intonation on the Basis of Instrumental Data , 1962 .

[11]  D. Klatt,et al.  Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: implications for models of pitch perception. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R. J. Ritsma Pitch discrimination and frequency discrimination , 1965 .

[13]  James L. Flanagan,et al.  Pitch Discrimination for Synthetic Vowels , 1957 .

[14]  E. M. Burns In search of the shruti , 1974 .

[15]  R. Biddulph,et al.  Differential Pitch Sensitivity of the Ear , 1931 .

[16]  J. Pierrehumbert The perception of fundamental frequency declination. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. Nordmark,et al.  Mechanisms of frequency discrimination. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.