Categorizing Professionals’ Perspectives on Environmental Communication with Implications for Graduate Education
暂无分享,去创建一个
Christopher E. Clarke | E. Cloyd | S. Kim | Xiaoquan Zhao | S. Hampton | Elizabeth Suhay | J. Olds | John E. Kotcher | K. Curran | M. Farooque | K. Akerlof | K. E. Rowan | Dann Sklarew | Erica Goldman | E. Rohring | D. Tomblin | Lisa M. Gring-Pemble | Cynthia Smith | K. Timm | C. Upperman | C. M. Brenes | Taryn Bromser-Kloeden | Elizabeth C. Duesterhoeft | Darren Milligan | Cynthia Sandoval | Andrew Wingfield | J. Kotcher
[1] Lisa M. Gring-Pemble,et al. Sustainable beekeeping, community driven-development, and tri-sector solutions with impact , 2020 .
[2] Emily Polk,et al. Situating the Scientist: Creating Inclusive Science Communication Through Equity Framing and Environmental Justice , 2020, Frontiers in Communication.
[3] C. Vaughan,et al. Who are boundary spanners and how can we support them in making knowledge more actionable in sustainability fields? , 2020 .
[4] M. Feliú-Mójer,et al. Science Communication Demands a Critical Approach That Centers Inclusion, Equity, and Intersectionality , 2020, Frontiers in Communication.
[5] I. Klyukanov. Communication: A Post-Discipline , 2019, European Journal of Communication.
[6] Young Eun Park,et al. On the Field of Environmental Communication: A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed Literature , 2018, Environmental Communication.
[7] Mike S. Schäfer,et al. Structure and development of science communication research: co-citation analysis of a developing field , 2018, Journal of Science Communication.
[8] Washington Dc,et al. Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda , 2018 .
[9] Anthony Dudo,et al. Understanding Scientists’ Willingness to Engage , 2018, Science Communication.
[10] B. McGreavy,et al. Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives , 2018, Sustainability Science.
[11] J. Kevin Hiers,et al. Linking knowledge to action: the role of boundary spanners in translating ecology , 2017 .
[12] Matthew A. Williamson,et al. Developing a translational ecology workforce , 2017 .
[13] D. Budescu,et al. Behavioral Science Tools to Strengthen Energy & Environmental Policy , 2017, Behavioral Science & Policy.
[14] F. Hollander,et al. Aims and Scopes , 2016, Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy / Zeitschrift für Kulturmanagement und Kulturpolitik.
[15] A. Meadow,et al. Lessons from First-Generation Climate Science Integrators , 2016 .
[16] Robert T. Craig. Grounded Practical Theory , 2015 .
[17] J. Cox,et al. The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication , 2015 .
[18] R. Cox,et al. Emergence And Growth Of The “Field” of Environmental Communication , 2015 .
[19] S. Ho,et al. Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior and Media Dependency Theory: Predictors of Public Pro-environmental Behavioral Intentions in Singapore , 2015 .
[20] Mark Pedelty,et al. Environmental communication and the public sphere , 2015 .
[21] Aiora Zabala,et al. qmethod: A Package to Explore Human Perspectives Using Q Methodology , 2014, R J..
[22] Ansgar Zerfass,et al. The Routledge Handbook of Strategic Communication , 2014 .
[23] Christoph Kueffer,et al. Responsible Use of Language in Scientific Writing and Science Communication , 2014 .
[24] M. Oppenheimer,et al. The ethics of scientific communication under uncertainty , 2014 .
[25] Karen Hutchins,et al. Addressing the Complexities of Boundary Work in Sustainability Science through Communication , 2013 .
[26] Charlotte Clark,et al. An exploration of future trends in environmental education research , 2013 .
[27] Christine J. Kirchhoff,et al. Narrowing the climate information usability gap , 2012 .
[28] Paul Stenner,et al. Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method & Interpretation , 2012 .
[29] E. Cuppen. Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods , 2012 .
[30] B. Fischhoff,et al. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks , 2011 .
[31] T. Steelman,et al. College and University Environmental Programs as a Policy Problem (Part 2): Strategies for Improvement , 2011, Environmental management.
[32] Dietram A. Scheufele,et al. What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. , 2009, American journal of botany.
[33] P. Stern,et al. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making , 2008 .
[34] R. Cox. Nature's “Crisis Disciplines”: Does Environmental Communication Have an Ethical Duty? , 2007 .
[35] Klaus Krippendorff,et al. Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .
[36] Kirk Hallahan,et al. Defining Strategic Communication , 2007 .
[37] R. Pielke,et al. The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .
[38] Seth Tuler,et al. Four Perspectives on Public Participation Process in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making: Combined Results from 10 Case Studies , 2006 .
[39] B. Johnson,et al. From the Inside Out: Environmental Agency Views about Communications with the Public , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[40] S. Jasanoff. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .
[41] R. Cialdini. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment , 2022 .
[42] R. Gifford,et al. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior : Predicting the Use of Public Transportation ' , 2002 .
[43] L. Cordingley,et al. Q methodology. , 1997, Nurse Researcher.
[44] Robert T. Craig,et al. Grounded Practical Theory: The Case of Intellectual Discussion , 1995 .
[45] Sharon R. Baratz,et al. Intellectual discussion in the academy as situated discourse , 1993 .
[46] Robert T. Craig. Multiple Goals in Discourse: An Epilogue , 1990 .
[47] S. Arnstein,et al. Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .
[48] William Stephenson,et al. Perspectives in Psychology: XXIII Definition of Opinion, Attitude and Belief , 1965 .
[49] Victoria Y. Martin. Four Common Problems In Environmental Social Research Undertaken by Natural Scientists , 2019 .
[50] P. Stern. New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .
[51] James L. Kinneavy,et al. A Theory of Discourse: The Aims of Discourse , 1971 .