ZCURVE_V: a new self-training system for recognizing protein-coding genes in viral and phage genomes

BackgroundIt necessary to use highly accurate and statistics-based systems for viral and phage genome annotations. The GeneMark systems for gene-finding in virus and phage genomes suffer from some basic drawbacks. This paper puts forward an alternative approach for viral and phage gene-finding to improve the quality of annotations, particularly for newly sequenced genomes.ResultsThe new system ZCURVE_V has been run for 979 viral and 212 phage genomes, respectively, and satisfactory results are obtained. To have a fair comparison with the currently available software of similar function, GeneMark, a total of 30 viral genomes that have not been annotated by GeneMark are selected to be tested. Consequently, the average specificity of both systems is well matched, however the average sensitivity of ZCURVE_V for smaller viral genomes (< 100 kb), which constitute the main parts of viral genomes sequenced so far, is higher than that of GeneMark. Additionally, for the genome of Amsacta moorei entomopoxvirus, probably with the lowest genomic GC content among the sequenced organisms, the accuracy of ZCURVE_V is much better than that of GeneMark, because the later predicts hundreds of false-positive genes. ZCURVE_V is also used to analyze well-studied genomes, such as HIV-1, HBV and SARS-CoV. Accordingly, the performance of ZCURVE_V is generally better than that of GeneMark. Finally, ZCURVE_V may be downloaded and run locally, particularly facilitating its utilization, whereas GeneMark is not downloadable. Based on the above comparison, it is suggested that ZCURVE_V may serve as a preferred gene-finding tool for viral and phage genomes newly sequenced. However, it is also shown that the joint application of both systems, ZCURVE_V and GeneMark, leads to better gene-finding results. The system ZCURVE_V is freely available at: http://tubic.tju.edu.cn/Zcurve_V/.ConclusionZCURVE_V may serve as a preferred gene-finding tool used for viral and phage genomes, especially for anonymous viral and phage genomes newly sequenced.

[1]  David L. Wheeler,et al.  GenBank: update , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  Rainer Merkl,et al.  YACOP: Enhanced gene prediction obtained by a combination of existing methods , 2003, Silico Biol..

[3]  Sidaction.  Expanding access to HIV treatment through community-based organizations : a joint publication of Sidaction, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) , 2005 .

[4]  Obi L. Griffith,et al.  The Genome Sequence of the SARS-Associated Coronavirus , 2003, Science.

[5]  Feng-Biao Guo,et al.  ZCURVE: a new system for recognizing protein-coding genes in bacterial and archaeal genomes. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  Mikhail S. Gelfand,et al.  Combining diverse evidence for gene recognition in completely sequenced bacterial genomes , 1998, German Conference on Bioinformatics.

[7]  R Zhang,et al.  Analysis of distribution of bases in the coding sequences by a diagrammatic technique. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  E. Trifonov.  Translation framing code and frame-monitoring mechanism as suggested by the analysis of mRNA and 16 S rRNA nucleotide sequences. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  R W Moyer,et al.  Complete genomic sequence of the Amsacta moorei entomopoxvirus: analysis and comparison with other poxviruses. , 2000, Virology.

[10]  J. A. Comer,et al.  A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  N. Michael,et al.  Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. , 2004, Military medicine.

[12]  G. Olsen,et al.  CRITICA: coding region identification tool invoking comparative analysis. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  Tatiana A. Tatusova,et al.  NCBI Reference Sequence Project: update and current status , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  M. Borodovsky,et al.  GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  M. Borodovsky,et al.  Heuristic approach to deriving models for gene finding. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  R. Guigó,et al.  Evaluation of gene structure prediction programs. , 1996, Genomics.

[19]  Ren Zhang,et al.  ZCURVE_CoV: a new system to recognize protein coding genes in coronavirus genomes, and its applications in analyzing SARS-CoV genomes , 2003, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

[20]  Folker Meyer,et al.  Development of joint application strategies for two microbial gene finders , 2004, Bioinform..

[21]  Mark Borodovsky,et al.  Improving gene annotation of complete viral genomes , 2003, Nucleic acids research.