Dynamic prescription maps for site-specific variable rate irrigation of cotton

A prescription map is a set of instructions that controls a variable rate irrigation (VRI) system. These maps, which may be based on prior yield, soil texture, topography, or soil electrical conductivity data, are often manually applied at the beginning of an irrigation season and remain static. The problem with static prescription maps is that they ignore spatiotemporal changes in crop water status. In a two-year study (2012 and 2013), a plant feedback system, including a wireless sensor network of infrared thermometers (IRTs), was used to develop dynamic prescription maps to accomplish adaptive irrigation scheduling for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). One-half of a center pivot field was divided into manually and plant feedback-controlled irrigation treatment plots. Irrigation treatments were at three levels, 75, 50 and 25 percent of full as defined by either replenishment of crop water use to field capacity or by the equivalent threshold of the IRT sensed crop water stress. The system accepted user input to control irrigation for the manual treatment plots (I75M, I50M, and I25M), and calculated and compared a thermal stress index for each plant feedback-controlled treatment plot (I75C, I50C and I25C) with a pre-determined threshold for automated irrigation scheduling. The effectiveness of the plant feedback irrigation scheduling system was evaluated by comparing measured lint yield, crop water use (ETc), and water use efficiency (WUE) with the manually scheduled treatment plots. Results for both years indicated that average lint yields were similar between the manual and plant feedback-control plots at the I75 level (181 and 182gm−2, respectively, in 2012; 115 and 103gm−2, respectively, in 2013) and I50 level (146 and 164gm−2, respectively, in 2012; 95 and 117gm−2, respectively, in 2013). At the I25 level, average lint yield was significantly greater for the plant feedback-compared with the manual-control treatment plots (142gm−2 and 92gm−2, respectively), but the mean amount of irrigation was twice that of the manual-control plots. Mean water use efficiencies (WUE) within the same irrigation treatment levels were similar between methods. Importantly, the automatic plant feedback system did not require the time consuming and expensive manual reading of neutron probe access tubes that was required to schedule the manual treatments. These results demonstrate that the integration of a plant feedback system with a commercial VRI system could be used to control site-specific irrigation management for cotton at higher irrigation treatment levels, i.e., I75 percent and I50 percent of full. Such a system can facilitate the use of a VRI system by automating prescription map coding and providing dynamic irrigation control instructions to meet variable crop water needs throughout the irrigation season. As of yet, further research is required to maintain automatic deficit irrigation at a level equivalent to 25 percent replenishment of crop water use relative to field capacity.

[1]  Robert G. Evans,et al.  Development of Combined Site-Specific MESA and LEPA Methods on a Linear Move Sprinkler Irrigation System , 2010 .

[2]  W. Ehrler Cotton Leaf Temperatures as Related to Soil Water Depletion and Meteorological Factors1 , 1973 .

[3]  A. D. Schneider,et al.  Automatic drip irrigation of corn and soybean. , 2000 .

[4]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK EFFECTIVELY CONTROLS CENTER PIVOT IRRIGATION OF SORGHUM , 2013 .

[5]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Comparison of grain sorghum, soybean, and cotton production under spray, LEPA, and SDI , 2009 .

[6]  Steven R. Evett,et al.  Automation of a Center Pivot Using the Temperature-Time- Threshold Method of Irrigation Scheduling , 2008 .

[7]  S. Evett,et al.  Canopy temperature based system effectively schedules and controls center pivot irrigation of cotton , 2010 .

[8]  William P. Kustas,et al.  A reexamination of the crop water stress index , 1988, Irrigation Science.

[9]  Panayiota Papastylianou,et al.  Effect of limited drip irrigation regime on yield, yield components, and fiber quality of cotton under Mediterranean conditions , 2014 .

[10]  Xavier Sirault,et al.  Imaging for precision agriculture - the mixed pixel problem with special reference to thermal imagery , 2014 .

[11]  Martin A. Hebel,et al.  Original papers: Evaluation of a wireless infrared thermometer with a narrow field of view , 2011 .

[12]  Glen L. Ritchie,et al.  Subsurface Drip and Overhead Irrigation: A Comparison of Plant Boll Distribution in Upland Cotton , 2009 .

[13]  B. L. McMichael,et al.  Field investigations of the response of cotton to water deficits , 1982 .

[14]  José O. Payero,et al.  Estimation of soil water deficit in an irrigated cotton field with infrared thermography , 2012 .

[15]  David A. Robinson,et al.  Field Estimation of Soil Water Content: A Practical Guide to Methods, Instrumentation and Sensor Technology , 2009 .

[16]  R. D. Jackson,et al.  Sun-angle and canopy-architecture effects on the spectral reflectance of six wheat cultivars , 1985 .

[17]  Ahmad Khalilian,et al.  Development of Clemson variable-rate lateral irrigation system , 2009 .

[18]  Ersel Yilmaz,et al.  Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey , 2009 .

[19]  W. Pettigrew,et al.  Moisture deficit effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution , 2004 .

[20]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Assessing Application Uniformity of a Variable Rate Irrigation System in a Windy Location , 2013 .

[21]  S. Evett,et al.  Modeling diurnal canopy temperature dynamics using one-time-of-day measurements and a reference temperature curve , 2004 .

[22]  A. D. Schneider,et al.  Canopy Temperature Based Automatic Irrigation Control , 1996 .

[23]  C. R. Camp,et al.  Evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling , 1996 .

[24]  T. Rao,et al.  The CWSI variations of a cotton crop in a semi-arid region of Northeast Brazil , 2005 .

[25]  T. A. Howell,et al.  Grain Sorghum Response to Sprinkler Application Methods and System Capacity , 1995 .

[26]  R. G. Evans,et al.  Opportunities for conservation with precision irrigation , 2005 .

[27]  A. D. Schneider,et al.  Evapotranspiration of Full-, Deficit-Irrigated, and Dryland Cotton on the Northern Texas High Plains , 2004 .

[28]  Semih Metin Sezen,et al.  Lepa and Trickle Irrigation of Cotton in the Southeast Anatolia Project (GAP) Area in Turkey , 2002 .

[29]  W. M. Lyle,et al.  lepa irrigation system evaluation , 1983 .

[30]  Narendra Kumar Gontia,et al.  Development of crop water stress index of wheat crop for scheduling irrigation using infrared thermometry , 2008 .

[31]  Öner Çetin,et al.  Effects of different irrigation methods on shedding and yield of cotton , 2002 .

[32]  D. F. Wanjura,et al.  ESTABLISHING DIFFERENTIAL IRRIGATION LEVELS USING TEMPERATURE-TIME THRESHOLDS , 2004 .

[33]  Glenn J. Fitzgerald,et al.  COTTON IRRIGATION SCHEDULING USING REMOTELY SENSED AND FAO-56 BASAL CROP COEFFICIENTS , 2005 .

[34]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  A remote irrigation monitoring and control system (RIMCS) for continuous move systems. Part B: field testing and results , 2010, Precision Agriculture.

[35]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Radiometer Footprint Model to Estimate Sunlit and Shaded Components for Row Crops , 2010 .

[36]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Using radiation thermography and thermometry to evaluate crop water stress in soybean and cotton , 2011 .

[37]  Jin Chen,et al.  Analysis of NDVI and scaled difference vegetation index retrievals of vegetation fraction , 2006 .

[38]  J. A. Millen,et al.  CORN CANOPY TEMPERATURES MEASURED WITH A MOVING INFRARED THERMOMETER ARRAY , 2002 .

[39]  G. Piccinni,et al.  Remote sensing of biotic and abiotic stress for irrigation management of cotton , 2007 .

[40]  D. D. Fangmeier,et al.  Quantifying wheat water stress with the crop water stress index to schedule irrigations , 1994 .

[41]  D. Nielsen,et al.  Infrared thermometry to measure single leaf temperatures for quantification of water stress in sunflower , 1989 .

[42]  A. Gitelson Wide Dynamic Range Vegetation Index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation. , 2004, Journal of plant physiology.

[43]  Jacques Wery,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PLANT AND SOIL WATER STATUS IN FIVE FIELD-GROWN COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.) CULTIVARS , 1998 .

[44]  S. R. Evett,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Crop Conditions Using Multiple Canopy Temperature Maps Created with Center-Pivot-Mounted Infrared Thermometers , 2007 .

[45]  R. G. Evans,et al.  Adoption of site-specific variable rate sprinkler irrigation systems , 2013, Irrigation Science.

[46]  K. El-Zik,et al.  Late season water stress in cotton. I. Plant growth, water use, and yield , 1996 .

[47]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Water Stress Detection Under High Frequency Sprinkler Irrigation with Water Deficit Index , 2003 .

[48]  D. F. Wanjura,et al.  Canopy temperature characterizations of corn and cotton water status. , 2000 .

[49]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Estimating Soil Moisture Under Low Frequency Surface Irrigation Using Crop Water Stress Index , 2003 .

[50]  S. Idso,et al.  Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator , 1981 .

[51]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Uniformity testing of variable-rate center pivot irrigation control systems , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[52]  D. F. Wanjura,et al.  Automated Irrigation Based on Threshold Canopy Temperature , 1992 .

[53]  S. B. Idso,et al.  Leaf diffusion resistance and photosynthesis in cotton as related to a foliage temperature based plant water stress index , 1982 .

[54]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  A crop water stress index and time threshold for automatic irrigation scheduling of grain sorghum , 2012 .

[55]  P. Unger,et al.  Pullman Soils: Distribution, Importance, Variability, and Management. , 1981 .