Strategies for reliable automatic onset time picking of acoustic emissions and of ultrasound signals in concrete.

Determining the onset of transient signals like seismograms, acoustic emissions or ultrasound signals is very time consuming if the onset is picked manually. Therefore, different approaches exist, especially in seismology. The concepts of the most popular approaches are summarized. An own approach adapted to ultrasound signals and acoustic emissions, based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), is presented. The AIC-picker is compared to an automatic onset detection algorithm based on the Hinkley criterion and also adapted to acoustic emissions. Manual picks performed by an analyst are used as reference values. Both automatic onset detection algorithms are applied to ultrasound signals which are used to monitor the setting and hardening of concrete. They are also applied to acoustic emissions recorded during a pull-out test. The AIC-picker produces sufficient reliable results for ultrasound signals where the deviation from the manual picks varies between 2% and 4%. Concerning acoustic emissions, only 10% of the events result in a mislocation vector greater than 5mm. It can be shown that our AIC-picker is a reliable tool for automatic onset detection for ultrasound signals and acoustic emissions of varying signal to noise ratio.

[1]  Peter M. Shearer,et al.  Characterization of global seismograms using an automatic-picking algorithm , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  Genshiro Kitagawa,et al.  A procedure for the modeling of non-stationary time series , 1978 .

[3]  N. Maeda A Method for Reading and Checking Phase Time in Auto-Processing System of Seismic Wave Data , 1985 .

[4]  F. W. Kellaway,et al.  Advanced Engineering Mathematics , 1969, The Mathematical Gazette.

[5]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Automatic P-Wave Arrival Detection and Picking with Multiscale Wavelet Analysis for Single-Component Recordings , 2003 .

[6]  M. Leonard,et al.  Comparison of Manual and Automatic Onset Time Picking , 2000 .

[7]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[8]  R. V. Allen,et al.  Automatic phase pickers: Their present use and future prospects , 1982 .

[9]  Reinoud Sleeman,et al.  Robust automatic P-phase picking: an on-line implementation in the analysis of broadband seismogram recordings , 1999 .

[10]  H. Akaike Markovian Representation of Stochastic Processes and Its Application to the Analysis of Autoregressive Moving Average Processes , 1974 .

[11]  Hans W. Reinhardt,et al.  Entwicklung eines Algorithmus zur automatischen Lokalisierung von Schallemissionsquellen , 1999 .

[12]  D. Hinkley Inference about the change-point from cumulative sum tests , 1971 .

[13]  S. Stanchits,et al.  Source analysis of acoustic emissions in Aue granite cores under symmetric and asymmetric compressive loads , 1998 .

[14]  L. Geiger Herdbestimmung bei Erdbeben aus den Ankunftszeiten , 1910 .

[15]  Manfred Baer,et al.  An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events , 1987 .

[16]  H. Reinhardt,et al.  Continuous monitoring of setting and hardening of mortar and concrete , 2004 .

[17]  Hengchang Dai,et al.  Automatic picking of seismic arrivals in local earthquake data using an artificial neural network , 1995 .

[18]  Manfred Joswig Pattern Recognition for Earthquake Detection , 1987, ASST.