The Use of 2D and 3D Displays for Shape-Understanding versus Relative-Position Tasks

Research on when and how to use three-dimensional (3D) perspective views on flat screens for operational tasks such as air traffic control is complex. We propose a functional distinction between tasks: those that require shape understanding versus those that require precise judgments of relative position. The distortions inherent in 3D displays hamper judging relative positions, whereas the integration of dimensions in 3D displays facilitates shape understanding. We confirmed these hypotheses with two initial experiments involving simple block shapes. The shape-understanding tasks were identification or mental rotation. The relative-position tasks were locating shadows and determining directions and distances between objects. We then extended the results to four experiments involving complex natural terrain. We compare our distinction with the integral/separable task distinction of Haskel and Wickens (1993). Applications for this research include displays for air traffic control, geoplots for military command and control, and potentially, any display of 3D information.

[1]  S. Ellis.  Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments , 1991 .

[2]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The implications of data-link for representing pilot request information on 2D and 3D air traffic control displays , 1996 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  When Users Want What's not Best for Them , 1995 .

[4]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Display Formatting Techniques for Improving Situation Awareness in the Aircraft Cockpit , 1991 .

[5]  Arnulf Remote,et al.  PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION IN VIRTUAL AND REAL ENVIRONMENTS , 1992 .

[6]  Steven Todd,et al.  Three-Dimensional Displays: Perception, Implementation, and Applications , 1989 .

[7]  G K Humphrey,et al.  An Examination of the Effects of Axis Foreshortening, Monocular Depth Cues, and Visual Field on Object Identification , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Effects of elevation angle disparity, complexity, and feature type on relating out-of-cockpit field of view to an electronic cartographic map , 1999 .

[9]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Proximity Compatibility Principle: Its Psychological Foundation and Relevance to Display Design , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[10]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[11]  O. Sabouraud.  [Space perception]. , 1978, Revue d'oto-neuro-ophtalmologie.

[12]  Anthony J. Aretz.  The Design of Electronic Map Displays , 1991 .

[13]  Joseph J. Lagowski,et al.  The Implications of , 1989 .

[14]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Cartography and map displays , 1991 .

[15]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[16]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Perspective Traffic Display Format and Airline Pilot Traffic Avoidance , 1987 .

[17]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perception of space and motion , 1995 .

[18]  Tyler T Prevett,et al.  Exploring the dimensions of egocentricity in aircraft navigation displays , 1995 .

[19]  Suzanne V. Bemis,et al.  Operator Performance as a Function of Type of Display: Conventional versus Perspective , 1988 .

[20]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  The Perception of Spatial Layout from Static Optical Information , 1995 .

[21]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Two- and Three-Dimensional Displays for Aviation: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison , 1993 .

[22]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Three-Dimensional Displays for Terrain and Weather Awareness in the National Airspace System , 1995 .

[23]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[24]  J. Cutting,et al.  Minimodularity and the perception of layout. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  L. van Breda,et al.  Perspective information in the cockpit as a target acquisition aid , 1998 .

[26]  C D Wickens,et al.  Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: effects of frame of reference and dimensionality. , 1996, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[27]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Perspective versus Plan View Air Traffic Control Displays: Survey and Empirical Results , 1991 .

[28]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Viewpoint Effects in Naming Silhouette and Shaded Images of Familiar Objects , 1998 .

[29]  J. Frisby.  Seeing: Illusion, Brain and Mind , 1979 .

[30]  Bradley S. Boyer.  3-D Weather Displays for Aircraft Cockpits. , 1994 .

[31]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Free Flight Cockpit Displays of Traffic and Weather: Effects of Dimensionality and Data Base Integration , 1997 .