Improved efficiency and cost reduction in the emergency department by replacing contemporary sensitive with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin immunoassay

Background: Although unquestionable evidence has been provided that high-sensitive (HS) cardiac troponin (cTn) immunoassay outperform the former contemporary-sensitive techniques, some clinicians are still hesitant to implement HS methods in routine clinical practice. This study was hence planned to evaluate the impact of replacing a contemporary-sensitive with HS cTnI immunoassay on hospital and laboratory workload. Methods: Information on the total number of cTnI tests ordered, total number of blood samples collected, total number of CK-MB tests ordered, number of patients with the first HS-cTnI value below the limit of detection (LoD) and cumulative HS-cTnI values was extracted from the local hospital information system for the semesters before and after the HS method was introduced. Results: Although the total emergency department (ED) visits modestly increased after introducing HS-cTnI, the number of total cTnI tests declined by over 10%. A substantial reduction of single-sample test requests was noted, accompanied by a considerable decline of 3- and 4-sample collections (i.e., -61% and -73%, respectively). A high percentage of patients (27.5%) displayed HS-cTnI values <LoD at admission, thus allowing safe discharge. The introduction of HS cTnI immunoassay was effective to collapse the number of CK-MB test requested and also generated favorable return of investment for the part of laboratory budget concerning cTnI testing (-3.2% of total costs for cTnI and -99.8% of total costs for CK-MB). Conclusion: The results of this study show substantial organizational and economic benefits by replacing contemporary-sensitive with HS cTnI immunoassays. (www.actabiomedica.it)

[1]  M. Pauschinger,et al.  [Clinical implications of the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction]. , 2020, Herz.

[2]  G. Lippi The origin of some laboratory medicine milestones , 2019, Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine.

[3]  E. Wiens,et al.  Routine creatine kinase testing does not provide clinical utility in the emergency department for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes , 2019, BMC Emergency Medicine.

[4]  B. Lindahl,et al.  Cardiac Troponin Elevation in Patients Without a Specific Diagnosis. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  G. Lippi,et al.  Trends of popularity of cardiac biomarkers: Insights from Google Trends , 2018, Emergency Care Journal.

[6]  J. Hollander High-Sensitivity Troponin: Time to Implement. , 2018, Annals of emergency medicine.

[7]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for venous blood sampling , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[8]  Kristian Thygesen,et al.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  G. Lippi,et al.  Critical appraisal to using relative or absolute cardiac troponins change for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction , 2018 .

[10]  G. Lippi,et al.  High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I immunoassay reduces the chance of patient misclassification in the emergency department , 2017 .

[11]  G. Lippi,et al.  Clinical, organizational and economic analysis of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing in the emergency department , 2017 .

[12]  B. Lindahl,et al.  Early rule out of acute myocardial infarction , 2017 .

[13]  James McCord,et al.  Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[14]  G. Lippi,et al.  Analytical evaluation of the new Beckman Coulter Access high sensitivity cardiac troponin I immunoassay , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[15]  J. Karnon,et al.  Cost effectiveness of high-sensitivity troponin compared to conventional troponin among patients presenting with undifferentiated chest pain: A trial based analysis. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[16]  G. Lippi,et al.  High-sensitivity cardiac troponin in the emergency department: The perfect storm? , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[17]  G. Lippi,et al.  Diagnostic algorithms for acute coronary syndrome-is one better than another? , 2016, Annals of translational medicine.

[18]  G. Lippi,et al.  A false positive case of cardiac troponin I identified with CK-MB reflex testing. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[19]  G. Lippi,et al.  Analytical assessment of the Beckman Coulter Unicel DxI AccuTnI+3 immunoassay , 2014, Diagnosis.

[20]  G. Lippi,et al.  Do we really need high-sensitivity troponin immunoassays in the emergency department? Maybe not , 2014, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[21]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Proposal for the use in emergency departments of cardiac troponins measured with the latest generation methods in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2013, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[22]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2011, European heart journal.