E-learning has the potential to be a very personalized experience and can be tailored to the individual involved. So far, science museums have yet to tap into this potential to any great extent, partly due to the relative newness of the technology involved and partly due to the expense. This chapter covers some of the speculative efforts that may improve the situation for the future, including the SAGRES project and the Ingenious Web site, among other examples. It is hoped that this will be helpful to science museums and centers that are considering the addition of personalization features to their own Web site. Currently, Web site personalization should be used with caution, but larger organizations should be considering the potential if they have not already started to do so. 701 E. Ch colate Avenue, Suite 200, Hershey PA 17033, USA Tel: 717/533-8845; Fax 717/533-8661; URL-http://www.idea-group.com ITB11396 INFORMATION SCIENCE PUBLISHING This chapter appears in the book, E-Learning and Virtual Science Centers edited by Leo Tan Wee Hin and R. Subramaniam © 2005, Idea Group Inc. Personalization Issues for Science Museum Web Sites and E-Learning 273 Copyright © 2005, Idea Group Inc. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of Idea Group Inc. is prohibited. Background In the past few years, the number of people visiting museums’ Web sites has gone up rapidly. As a consequence, museums have to face the significant challenge of creating virtual environments that are progressively more adapted towards the different needs, interests and expectations of their heterogeneous users. Increasingly, museums and science centers are using their Web sites to augment their learning facilities in potentially innovative ways (Tan et al., 2003). In particular, museums need to provide for differing online requirements such as teaching, e-learning and research (Hamma, 2004). One of the solutions available to help is the introduction of personalization techniques (Dolog & Sintek, 2004) that, by providing differentiated access to information and services according to the user’s profile, make facilities and applications more relevant and useful for individual users, thus improving the overall visitor’s experience. Science museums, by their very technological nature, ought to be at the vanguard of applying new techniques like personalization. Developed in the early 1990s in an attempt to try to respond to the different needs and characteristics of an ever-growing number of Internet users, personalized or adaptive Web systems have since been exploited in different sectors such as commerce, tourism, education, finance, culture and health. What distinguishes these systems from the traditional static Web is the creation of a user model that represents the characteristics of the user, utilizing them in the creation of content and presentations adapted to different individuals (Brusilovsky & Maybury, 2002). By so doing, personalization becomes a useful tool in the selection and filtering of information for the user, facilitating navigation and increasing the speed of access as well as the likelihood that the user’s search is successful. The techniques available to collect information about users, as well as the methods used to process such information to create user profiles and to provide adapted information, are varied. A brief description of the different approaches will be presented here before moving on to illustrate different application examples within the science museum world. Personalization Techniques A first important distinction concerning the amount of control the user has on the adaptation process can be made between customization and personalization. Customization or adaptability occurs when “the user can configure an interface and create a profile manually, adding and removing elements in the profile” (Bonnet, 2002). The control of the look and/or content of the site are explicit and user-driven; that is, the user is involved actively in the process and has direct control. In personalization or adaptivity, on the other hand, the user is seen as being passive, or at least somewhat less in control (Bonnet, 2002). Modifications concerning the content or even the structure of a Web site are performed automatically by the system based on information concerning the user stored in the so-called user profile. Such information about the user 18 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the publisher's webpage: www.igi-global.com/chapter/personalization-issues-science-museumweb/9088
[1]
Ann Borda,et al.
The Building of Online Communities: An approach for learning organizations, with a particular focus on the museum sector
,
2004,
ArXiv.
[2]
Marcus Thint,et al.
Personalisation and Web Communities
,
2003
.
[3]
Anil K. Aggarwal,et al.
Virtual science centers: a new genre of learning in Web-based promotion of science education
,
2003,
36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.
[4]
Vincent Wade,et al.
Towards a Standards-based Approach to e-Learning Personalization using Reusable Learning Objects
,
2002
.
[5]
Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.
Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web
,
2004,
The Practical Handbook of Internet Computing.
[6]
S. Hsi,et al.
A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum
,
2003,
J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[7]
M. Lepper,et al.
Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice.
,
1996
.
[8]
Peter Dolog,et al.
Personalization in distributed e-learning environments
,
2004,
WWW Alt. '04.
[9]
Andrea Carugati,et al.
Development of E-Government Services For Cultural Heritage: Examining the Key Dimensions
,
2007,
Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..
[10]
Marcus Specht,et al.
Adaptive Information for Nomadic Activities. A process oriented approach
,
1999,
Software-Ergonomie.
[11]
Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa,et al.
Providing Personal Assistance in the SAGRES Virtual Museum.
,
2001
.
[12]
Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa,et al.
The SAGRES Virtual Museum with Software Agents to Stimulate the Visiting of Museums
,
1999,
WebNet.
[13]
Suzanne Hidi,et al.
Interest and Its Contribution as a Mental Resource for Learning
,
1990
.
[14]
MAGDALINI EIRINAKI,et al.
Web mining for web personalization
,
2003,
TOIT.
[15]
Claudia Roda,et al.
Various Views on Digital Interactivity
,
2006
.
[16]
Jonathan P. Bowen,et al.
Online Museum Discussion Forums; What do we have? What do we need?
,
2003
.
[17]
Monica Bonett.
Personalization of Web Services: Opportunities and Challenges
,
2001
.
[18]
Jaideep Srivastava,et al.
Automatic personalization based on Web usage mining
,
2000,
CACM.
[19]
Jonathan P. Bowen,et al.
The website of the UK Museum of the Year
,
2000
.
[20]
Shuk Ying Ho,et al.
Web personalization: Is it effective?
,
2003
.
[21]
Peter Brusilovsky,et al.
From adaptive hypermedia to the adaptive web
,
2002,
CACM.
[22]
Kenneth Hamma.
The role of museums in online teaching, learning, and research
,
2004,
First Monday.
[23]
Law,et al.
Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001
,
2002
.
[24]
Claude Ghaoui,et al.
Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction
,
2005
.
[25]
Mirjana Spasojevic,et al.
The Electronic Guidebook: Using Portable Devices And A Wireless Web-based Network To Extend The Museum Experience
,
2002
.