Near miss and minor injury information--can it be used to plan and evaluate injury prevention programmes?

AIM To assess the usefulness of collecting information on near miss and minor injuries for use in planning and evaluating injury prevention programmes for children aged under 5 years in the home environment. METHOD The research was set within the context of a controlled intervention study based in 36 general practices across Nottingham. All parents of children aged between 3 and 12 months who had completed the intervention study questionnaire (n = 1594) were used as the sampling frame for the diary study. A diary, developed specifically for the main intervention study, was administered to a systematically assigned sample of 434 parents. Information provided by the Home Accident Surveillance System on 252 randomly selected children, of the same age and sex, who had attended an accident and emergency department, was used to compare the circumstances surrounding near miss and minor injuries with those of medically attended injuries. The children whose parents had completed a diary were followed over a two year time period. The children who had had a medically attended injury were identified from a search of the child's general practice records and the Queens Medical Centre accident and emergency records. The definition of a near miss used in the study was: A near miss incident is something your child does or that happened to your child which could have resulted in him/her being hurt, but fortunately it did not. RESULTS Overall two hundred and thirty one (53%) diaries were completed and returned. Three hundred and fifty incidents were recorded of which 207 were near misses and 143 minor injuries. The circumstances surrounding near miss and minor injuries, although not identical when compared to medically attended injuries, were very similar. The relationship between the occurrence of near miss, minor injuries and future medically attended injuries appeared weak, for all categories the negative predictive value was higher than the positive predictive value. CONCLUSION Although the circumstances surrounding all the incident categories were similar, the numbers were too small to see whether specific injury mechanisms predict future injuries of the same type. It appeared that near miss and minor injuries are of limited use in predicting medically attended injuries, however this hypothesis needs to be tested on a much larger sample.

[1]  K. Cliff,et al.  Accident and emergency departments--why people attend with minor injuries and ailments. , 1986, Public health.

[2]  A. Richardson,et al.  The health diary: an examination of its use as a data collection method. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  Kenneth R. Laughery,et al.  Major and minor injuries at work: Are the circumstances similar or different? , 1993 .

[4]  H. W. Heinrich Industrial Accident Prevention , 1941 .

[5]  G Magnusson,et al.  The role of proximity in the use of hospital emergency departments. , 1980, Sociology of health & illness.

[6]  S. Jarvis,et al.  Measuring the frequency of "severe" accidental injury in childhood. , 1992, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[7]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[8]  The Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) in the UK: a pilot study. , 1996, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[9]  V. Gibson,et al.  An analysis of the use of diaries as a data collection method. , 1995, Nurse researcher.

[10]  T. Peters,et al.  Case definition in childhood accident studies: a vital factor in determining results. , 1986, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  Lees Re,et al.  Increasing the understanding of industrial accidents: an analysis of potential major injury records. , 1989 .

[12]  B. Guyer,et al.  An approach to the epidemiology of childhood injuries. , 1985, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[13]  D. Zimmerman,et al.  The Diary , 1977 .

[14]  C. Mckee,et al.  Accident and emergency attendance rates: variation among patients from different general practices. , 1990, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[15]  M. Mccarthy,et al.  Measuring severity of injuries to children from home accidents. , 1988, Archives of disease in childhood.

[16]  P. Scheidt,et al.  The effects of recall on estimating annual nonfatal injury rates for children and adolescents. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[17]  Philip L. Graitcer,et al.  The development of state and local injury surveillance systems , 1987 .

[18]  P Marsh,et al.  Preventing injuries in children: cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care , 1999, BMJ.

[19]  L. Peterson,et al.  Measures of children's injuries: self-reported versus maternal-reported events with temporally proximal versus delayed reporting. , 1993, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[20]  P. Contoyannis,et al.  'Our healthier nation'? , 1999, Health economics.

[21]  R. Lyons,et al.  Injury surveillance in children--usefulness of a centralised database of accident and emergency attendances. , 1995, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.