Paired-agent imaging for detection of head and neck cancers

Head and neck cancers overwhelmingly overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). This overexpression has been utilized for head and neck cancers using molecular targeted agents for therapy and cancer cell detection. Significant progress has been made in using EGFR-targeted fluorescent antibody and Affibody molecule agents for fluorescent guided surgery in head and neck cancers. Although success in achieving tumor-to-background ratio of 3-5 have been achieved, the field is limited by the non-specific fluorescence in normal tissues as well as EGFR specific fluorescence in the oral cavity. We propose that paired-agent imaging (PAI) could improve the contrast between tumor and normal tissue by removing the fluorescent signal arising from non-specific binding. Here, ABY-029 – an anti-EGFR Affibody molecule labeled with IRDye 800CW – and IRDye 680RD conjugated to Affibody Control Imaging Agent molecule (IR680-Affctrl) are used as targeted and untargeted control agents, respectively, in a panel of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) to test the ability of PAI to increase tumor detection. Initial results demonstrate that binding potential, a value proportional to receptor concentration, correlates well to EGFR expression but experimental limitations prevented pixel-by-pixel analysis that was desired. Although promising, a more rigorous and well-defined experimental protocol is required to align ex vivo EGFR immunohistochemistry with in vivo binding potential and fluorescence intensity. Additionally, a new set of paired-agents, ABY-029 and IRDye 700DX, are successfully tested in naïve mice and will be carried forward for clinical translation.

[1]  P. Choyke,et al.  The effects of conjugate and light dose on photo-immunotherapy induced cytotoxicity , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[2]  I. van der Tweel,et al.  The status of the resection margin as a prognostic factor in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma. , 1991, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[3]  H. Lynch,et al.  Psychologic Aspects of Cancer Genetic Testing: A Research Update for Clinicians , 1997 .

[4]  G. Waksman,et al.  Supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of head and neck tumors. Survival results in 212 cases. , 1993, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[5]  Quynh-Thu Le,et al.  Cetuximab-Based Immunotherapy and Radioimmunotherapy of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  Jason R. Gunn,et al.  Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[7]  Jovan G. Brankov,et al.  Quantification of the binding potential of cell-surface receptors in fresh excised specimens via dual-probe modeling of SERS nanoparticles , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[8]  T. Hasan,et al.  Accounting for pharmacokinetic differences in dual-tracer receptor density imaging , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Fluorescent Affibody Peptide Penetration in Glioma Margin Is Superior to Full Antibody , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  H. Pillsbury,et al.  A Rationale for Therapy of the N0 Neck , 1997, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  Hisataka Kobayashi,et al.  Near-infrared theranostic photoimmunotherapy (PIT): repeated exposure of light enhances the effect of immunoconjugate. , 2012, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[12]  Ulrich Harréus,et al.  Surgical errors and risks – the head and neck cancer patient , 2013, GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery.

[13]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Imaging targeted-agent binding in vivo with two probes. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Comparison of Kinetic Models for Dual-Tracer Receptor Concentration Imaging in Tumors. , 2014, Austin journal of biomedical engineering.

[15]  Keith Paulsen,et al.  Toxicity and Pharmacokinetic Profile for Single-Dose Injection of ABY-029: a Fluorescent Anti-EGFR Synthetic Affibody Molecule for Human Use , 2017, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[16]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Nodal lymph flow quantified with afferent vessel input function allows differentiation between normal and cancer-bearing nodes. , 2015, Biomedical optics express.

[17]  Joshua S Richman,et al.  Safety and Tumor Specificity of Cetuximab-IRDye800 for Surgical Navigation in Head and Neck Cancer , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  High Vascular Delivery of EGF, but Low Receptor Binding Rate Is Observed in AsPC-1 Tumors as Compared to Normal Pancreas , 2011, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[19]  B. Pogue,et al.  Pixel-based absorption correction for dual-tracer fluorescence imaging of receptor binding potential. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[20]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Improved tumor contrast achieved by single time point dual-reporter fluorescence imaging. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[21]  Kristian J. Sexton,et al.  Direct Characterization of Arterial Input Functions by Fluorescence Imaging of Exposed Carotid Artery to Facilitate Kinetic Analysis , 2014, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[22]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Quantifying receptor density in vivo using a dual probe approach with fluorescence molecular imaging , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[23]  Scott C Davis,et al.  Dual-tracer background subtraction approach for fluorescent molecular tomography , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[24]  W. Fee,et al.  Chemotherapy as a substitute for surgery in the treatment of advanced resectable head and neck cancer. A report from the northern California oncology group , 1987, Cancer.

[25]  Sophie J Deharvengt,et al.  Dynamic dual-tracer MRI-guided fluorescence tomography to quantify receptor density in vivo , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Microscopic lymph node tumor burden quantified by macroscopic dual-tracer molecular imaging , 2014, Nature Medicine.

[27]  E. Rosenthal,et al.  Effects of an Unlabeled Loading Dose on Tumor-Specific Uptake of a Fluorescently Labeled Antibody for Optical Surgical Navigation , 2017, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[28]  T. Hasan,et al.  Advantages of a dual-tracer model over reference tissue models for binding potential measurement in tumors , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Jason R. Gunn,et al.  In Vivo Quantification of Tumor Receptor Binding Potential with Dual-Reporter Molecular Imaging , 2012, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[30]  Hisataka Kobayashi,et al.  Cancer Cell-Selective In Vivo Near Infrared Photoimmunotherapy Targeting Specific Membrane Molecules , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[31]  Jason R. Gunn,et al.  Tumor Endothelial Marker Imaging in Melanomas Using Dual-Tracer Fluorescence Molecular Imaging , 2014, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[32]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Quantitative in vivo immunohistochemistry of epidermal growth factor receptor using a receptor concentration imaging approach. , 2014, Cancer research.

[33]  J. Roodenburg,et al.  Morbidity of the neck after head and neck cancer therapy , 2004, Head & neck.

[34]  R. Nason,et al.  The clinical significance of the positive surgical margin in oral cancer. , 2007, Oral oncology.