Intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: improved detection with 3D double inversion-recovery MR imaging.

PURPOSE To prospectively compare the depiction of intracortical lesions by using multislab three-dimensional (3D) double inversion-recovery (DIR), multislab 3D fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR), and T2-weighted spin-echo (SE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Local ethics review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Conventional T2-weighted SE and multislab 3D FLAIR and DIR images were acquired in 10 patients with multiple sclerosis (five women, five men) and 11 age-matched healthy control subjects (seven women, four men). Mean age was 40 years (range, 25-54 years) in patients and 34 years (range, 24-55 years) in control subjects. Lesions were classified according to seven anatomic regions: intracortical, mixed white matter-gray matter, juxtacortical, deep gray matter, periventricular white matter, deep white matter, and infratentorial lesions. The numbers of lesions per category were compared between techniques (Dunnett-corrected analysis of variance). Gain or loss (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of numbers of lesions detected at 3D DIR imaging was calculated in comparison with those detected at T2-weighted SE and 3D FLAIR imaging. RESULTS Total number of lesions did not differ between 3D DIR and 3D FLAIR sequences, but the 3D DIR sequence showed a gain of 21% (95% CI: 4%, 41%) in comparison with the T2-weighted SE sequence. Because of high gray matter-white matter contrast, DIR images depicted more intracortical lesions (80 lesions in 10 patients) than both SE (10 lesions) and FLAIR (31 lesions) images; gains with DIR were 538% (95% CI: 191%, 1297%) and 152% (95% CI: 15%, 453%) compared with SE and FLAIR, respectively. Only four intracortical lesions were detected in control subjects. Also, DIR imaging enabled a better definition of mixed white matter-gray matter lesions because of greater contrast between the lesion and its surroundings. CONCLUSION MR imaging with 3D DIR enables increased intracortical lesion detection in the multiple sclerosis brain, as well as improved distinction between juxtacortical and white matter-gray matter lesions.

[1]  Ferenc A. Jolesz,et al.  A High-resolution Clinical Whole-Brain Scan Using Single-Slab Three-dimensional TlW, T2W and FLAIR Fast Spin-Echo Sequences , 2002 .

[2]  G. Barker,et al.  Three-dimensional fast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (3D fast FLAIR): a new MRI sequence which increases the detectable cerebral lesion load in multiple sclerosis. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Alan J. Thompson,et al.  Disability and lesion load in MS: a reassessment with MS functional composite score and 3D fast FLAIR , 2002, Journal of Neurology.

[4]  M. Rovaris,et al.  Cognitive dysfunction in patients with mildly disabling relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: an exploratory study with diffusion tensor MR imaging , 2002, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[5]  Massimo Filippi,et al.  Quantification of brain gray matter damage in different MS phenotypes by use of diffusion tensor MR imaging. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[6]  B. Trapp,et al.  Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[7]  R. Rudick,et al.  Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  B. Trapp,et al.  Subpial Demyelination in the Cerebral Cortex of Multiple Sclerosis Patients , 2003, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[9]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Isotropic 3D fast FLAIR imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis patients: initial experience , 2002, European Radiology.

[10]  G. Comi,et al.  Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  A A Bankier,et al.  Double inversion recovery imaging of the brain: initial experience and comparison with fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Magnetization Transfer Ratio Histogram Analysis of Normal-Appearing Gray Matter and Normal-Appearing White Matter in Multiple Sclerosis , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  R. Bakshi,et al.  Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging detects cortical and juxtacortical multiple sclerosis lesions. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[14]  P. M. Matthews,et al.  Evidence of early cortical atrophy in MS , 2003, Neurology.

[15]  B D Trapp,et al.  Intracortical multiple sclerosis lesions are not associated with increased lymphocyte infiltration , 2003, Multiple sclerosis.

[16]  J K Udupa,et al.  MR imaging quantitation of gray matter involvement in multiple sclerosis and its correlation with disability measures and neurocognitive testing. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  M Rovaris,et al.  Cortical/subcortical disease burden and cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  F A Jolesz,et al.  Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. , 2000, Radiology.

[19]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[20]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Serial isotropic three-dimensional fast FLAIR imaging: using image registration and subtraction to reveal active multiple sclerosis lesions. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  B. Brownell,et al.  The distribution of plaques in the cerebrum in multiple sclerosis , 1962, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  A. Compston,et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[23]  P A Narayana,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a new pulse sequence for rapid acquisition of double inversion recovery images for simultaneous suppression of white matter and CSF , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  F. Roncaroli,et al.  Neuropathology of multiple sclerosis , 2012 .

[25]  M Filippi,et al.  Linking structural, metabolic and functional changes in multiple sclerosis , 2001, European journal of neurology.

[26]  T W Redpath,et al.  Technical note: use of a double inversion recovery pulse sequence to image selectively grey or white brain matter. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[27]  A. J. Thompson,et al.  Magnetic resonance studies of abnormalities in the normal appearing white matter and grey matter in multiple sclerosis , 2003, Journal of Neurology.

[28]  A. Thompson,et al.  Neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis patients: the role of (juxta)cortical lesion on FLAIR , 2000, Multiple sclerosis.

[29]  V. Perry,et al.  Axonal damage in acute multiple sclerosis lesions. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  J K Udupa,et al.  Magnetization transfer ratio histogram analysis of gray matter in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[31]  M Cercignani,et al.  Magnetisation transfer ratio and mean diffusivity of normal appearing white and grey matter from patients with multiple sclerosis , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[32]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Cortical plaques visualised by fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging in relapsing multiple sclerosis , 1996, Neuroradiology.

[34]  M Rovaris,et al.  MRI correlates of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients. , 2000, Journal of neurovirology.

[35]  A. Jackson,et al.  Memory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis corresponds to juxtacortical lesion load on fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR images. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.