Habitat expansion and contraction in anchovy and sardine populations

We investigated the relationships between stock biomass, distribution area and mean density of sardine and anchovy populations off California, Peru, South Africa and Japan. Our objective was to elucidate whether their ecological responses to habitat availability and use would support the possibility of them developing synchronic, alternating biomass fluctuations. Results indicate that as populations of both species grow in size, both the area they occupy and their packing density increase, generally consistent with the basin model. The relationship between distribution area and stock biomass is allometric, which implies that there is a limit to the stock expansion to new areas. Patterns of space occupation appear to differ between sardine and anchovy in some regions. In South Africa and Japan anchovy occupies larger area per unit biomass than sardine, consistent with habitat requirements as determined by their feeding ecology. Off California and Peru results confirm that in general species expand their distribution area with stock size, but specific patterns are less clear. Reasons for this are discussed, including sampling biases, the role of upwelling in limiting anchovy’s habitat off Peru, the ability of sardine to use offshore habitats off California, as well as possible differential space occupation patterns during population growth and decline. It is suggested that habitat availability may not be a pre-requisite for sardine growth in some areas, while anchovy may require habitat to become available for populations to grow. The differential habitat dependency and use of space between both species suggests that they cannot be considered to ecologically replace each other. While differences in space utilization may provide opportunities for diverging population paths, the ecological mechanisms behind out-of-phase fluctuations may be much more complex than a simple replacement. The results provide the first comparative, quantitative estimates of biomass/area relationships for pelagic fish, of use in models investigating the potential for expansion and contraction of anchovy and sardine populations worldwide based on climate change-driven habitat predictions.

[1]  Mark D. Ohman,et al.  A COMPARISON OF ZOOPLANKTON SAMPLING METHODS IN THE CALCOFI TIME SERIES , 1995 .

[2]  Biological Bases for Mixed-Species Fisheries: Species Co-distribution in Relation to Environmental and Biotic Variables , 1988 .

[3]  M. Barangé,et al.  Refined estimates of South African pelagic fish biomass from hydro-acoustic surveys: quantifying the effects of target strength, signal attenuation and receiver saturation , 2008 .

[4]  C. T. Marshall,et al.  Density-dependent habitat selection by juvenile haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) on the southwestern Scotian Shelf , 1995 .

[5]  M. Litvak,et al.  Density‐dependent habitat selection and the ideal free distribution in marine fish spatial dynamics: considerations and cautions , 2004 .

[6]  R. Rykaczewski,et al.  Influence of ocean winds on the pelagic ecosystem in upwelling regions , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  I. Hampton.  The role of acoustic surveys in the assessment of pelagic fish resources on the South African continental shelf , 1992 .

[8]  M. Barangé,et al.  Empirical determination of in situ target strengths of three loosely aggregated pelagic fish species , 1996 .

[9]  I. Hampton.  Acoustic study on the abundance and distribution of anchovy spawners and recruits in South African waters , 1987 .

[10]  José A. A. De Oliveira,et al.  Surplus production, variability, and climate change in the great sardine and anchovy fisheries , 2001 .

[11]  Claude Roy,et al.  Worldwide large-scale fluctuations of sardine and anchovy populations , 1999 .

[12]  L. Klyashtorin.  Long-term climate change and main commercial fish production in the Atlantic and Pacific , 1998 .

[13]  J. Coetzee,et al.  Has the fishery contributed to a major shift in the distribution of South African sardine , 2008 .

[14]  C. van der Lingen,et al.  Comparative trophodynamics of anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus and sardine Sardinops sagax in the southern Benguela: are species alternations between small pelagic fish trophodynamically mediated? , 2006 .

[15]  Ransom A. Myers,et al.  Was an increase in natural mortality responsible for the collapse off northern cod , 1995 .

[16]  E. Simmonds,et al.  Optimizing the design of acoustic surveys of Peruvian anchoveta , 2009 .

[17]  R. Hewitt.  HISTORICAL REVIEW OF THE OCEANOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO FISHERY RESEARCH , 1988 .

[18]  H. Benoît,et al.  Change in habitat associations and geographic distribution of thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) in the southern Gulf of St Lawrence: density‐dependent habitat selection or response to environmental change? , 2006 .

[19]  G. Swartzman,et al.  Anchovy (Engraulis ringens) and sardine (Sardinops sagax) spatial dynamics and aggregation patterns in the Humboldt Current ecosystem, Peru, from 1983–2003 , 2007 .

[20]  Alec D. MacCall,et al.  Dynamic Geography of Marine Fish Populations , 1990 .

[21]  P. Petitgas.  Biomass-dependent dynamics of fish spatial distributions characterized by geostatistical aggregation curves , 1998 .

[22]  N. Lo,et al.  SPAWNING BIOMASS OF PACIFIC SARDINE (SARDINOPS SAGAX), FROM 1994-2004 OFF CALIFORNIA , 2005 .

[23]  C. Mullon,et al.  Investigating remote synchronous patterns in fisheries , 2003 .

[24]  Daniel Pauly,et al.  The Peruvian upwelling ecosystem: dynamics and interactions , 1989 .

[25]  F. Schwing,et al.  A new climate regime in northeast pacific ecosystems , 2003 .

[26]  J. Jäger,et al.  Climate change: Science, impacts an policy , 1991 .

[27]  Paule Smith.  Monitoring interannual changes in spawning area of Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax) , 1990 .

[28]  R. Sánchez,et al.  Dynamic geography of small pelagic fish populations in the California Current System on the regimen time sacale (1931-1997) , 2002 .

[29]  C. Bishop,et al.  Distribution changes and abundance of northern cod (Gadus morhua), 1981-1993. , 1997 .

[30]  D. Hedgecock,et al.  Sardine and anchovy regime fluctuations of abundance in four regions of the world oceans: a workshop report , 1992 .

[31]  M. Barangé,et al.  Climate change and the economics of the world's fisheries : examples of small pelagic stocks , 2006 .

[32]  M. Barangé,et al.  Spatial structure of co-occurring anchovy and sardine populations from acoustic data: implications for survey design , 1997 .

[33]  M. Barangé,et al.  Strategies of space occupation by anchovy and sardine in the southern Benguela: the role of stock size and intra-species competition , 2005 .

[34]  E. John Simmonds,et al.  Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[35]  D. P. Swain,et al.  Relationships between geographic distribution and abundance of American plaice (Hippoglossoides platessoides) in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence , 1996 .

[36]  D. P. Swain,et al.  Density-Dependent Geographic Distribution of Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) in the Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence , 1993 .

[37]  A. F. Sinclair,et al.  Fish distribution and catchability : what is the appropriate measure of distribution ? , 1994 .

[38]  M. Dickey‐Collas,et al.  Current trends in the assessment and management of stocks , 2009 .

[39]  Sophie Bertrand,et al.  Schooling behaviour and environmental forcing in relation to anchoveta distribution: An analysis across multiple spatial scales , 2008 .

[40]  François Gerlotto,et al.  Introducing nature in fisheries research: the use of underwater acoustics for an ecosystem approach of fish population , 2003 .

[41]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[42]  R. Francis,et al.  Larval stage controls on Pacific sardine recruitment variability: high zooplankton abundance linked to poor reproductive success , 2007 .

[43]  Sophie Bertrand,et al.  The relationship of anchovy and sardine to water masses in the Peruvian Humboldt Current System from 1983 to 2005 , 2008 .

[44]  P. Petitgas.  Sole egg distributions in space and time characterised by a geostatistical model and its estimation variance , 1997 .

[45]  I. Aoki,et al.  Optimal growth temperature hypothesis: Why do anchovy flourish and sardine collapse or vice versa under the same ocean regime? , 2007 .

[46]  J. P. Wheeler,et al.  Interaction Between Stock Area, Stock Abundance, and Catchability Coefficient , 1985 .

[47]  C. Walters,et al.  Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[48]  Astrid Jarre,et al.  Small pelagics in upwelling systems: patterns of interaction and structural changes in "wasp-waist" ecosystems , 2000 .

[49]  A. Maccall,et al.  World-wide fluctuations of sardine and anchovy stocks: the regime problem , 1989 .

[50]  M. Barangé,et al.  Trends in the abundance and distribution of anchovy and sardine on the South African continental shelf in the 1990s, deduced from acoustic surveys , 1999 .

[51]  M. Sinclair,et al.  Atlantic Herring: Stock Discreteness and Abundance , 1982, Science.

[52]  C. V. Lingen.  Effect of particle size and concentration on the feeding behaviour of adult pilchard Sardinops sagax , 1994 .

[53]  Claude Roy,et al.  Optimal Environmental Window and Pelagic Fish Recruitment Success in Upwelling Areas , 1989 .

[54]  M. Barangé,et al.  Characterizing spawning habitats of Japanese sardine (Sardinops melanostictus) Japanese anchovy (Engraulis japonicus) and Pacific round herring (Etrumeus teres) in the northwestern Pacific , 2007 .

[55]  S. Lluch-Cota,et al.  Contrasting spawning temperature optima: Why are anchovy and sardine regime shifts synchronous across the North Pacific? , 2008 .

[56]  A. Bertrand,et al.  From small‐scale habitat loopholes to decadal cycles: a habitat‐based hypothesis explaining fluctuation in pelagic fish populations off Peru , 2004 .

[57]  Francisco P. Chavez,et al.  From Anchovies to Sardines and Back: Multidecadal Change in the Pacific Ocean , 2003, Science.