Encoding activity and face recognition.

A series of studies conducted over the past 20 years have explored the effects of various tasks on recognition memory for faces. Memory for faces appears better when the study task involves judgements about an abstract trait rather than a physical feature. The various situations in which these results were obtained raise important methodological questions regarding the learning conditions, whether incidental or intentional, and the duration of exposure to the stimulus during the study phase. We consider here two alternative explanations for the reported results. One concerns depth of processing and the other the opposition between component and holistic processing. Possible strategies for improving face recognition performance are considered.

[1]  E Winograd,et al.  Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[2]  Effects of Exposure Time and Inversion on the Confidence-Accuracy Relationship in Facial Memory: A Test of the Optimality Hypothesis , 1990 .

[3]  A. Baddeley,et al.  When face recognition fails. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[4]  M. V. Kleeck Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  L. Gerstman,et al.  Encoding strategies and recognition of faces by alcoholic korsakoff and other brain-damaged patients , 1981 .

[6]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[7]  S. Carey,et al.  Development of face recognition: A maturational component? , 1980 .

[8]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Visual masking : an integrative approach , 1984 .

[9]  G. Bower,et al.  Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory , 1974 .

[10]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  A physical system approach to recognition memory for spatially transformed faces , 1988, Neural Networks.

[11]  R. Flin,et al.  Developmental factors in face processing , 1989 .

[12]  The influence of trait and physical-feature-based orienting strategies on aspects of facial memory. , 1983, British journal of psychology.

[13]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Semantic interpretation effects on memory for faces , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[14]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[15]  John H. Mueller,et al.  Levels of processing in facial recognition memory , 1977 .

[16]  S E Comish Recognition of facial stimuli following an intervening task involving the Identi-kit. , 1987, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  S. Mudd,et al.  Depth of processing approach to face recognition: A test of two theories. , 1991 .

[18]  Elizabeth K. Warrington,et al.  The effect of orienting tasks on recognition memory , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[19]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Orienting task and study time in facial recognition , 1978 .

[20]  E L Brown,et al.  Memory for faces: testing method, encoding strategy, and confidence. , 1981, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  E. Winograd,et al.  Developmental differences in children's recognition memory for faces. , 1978 .

[22]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  R. L. Terry,et al.  How wearing eyeglasses affects facial recognition , 1993 .

[24]  J. Schooler,et al.  Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  John W. Shepherd,et al.  THE FACE AND SOCIAL ATTRIBUTION , 1989 .

[26]  The influence of different processing strategies on the recognition of transformed and untransformed faces. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[27]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[28]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. , 1975 .

[29]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Judgments of facial attractiveness in the absence of eye movements , 1980 .

[30]  W. Simpson,et al.  The perception of smiles , 1972 .

[31]  R. Malpass,et al.  Verbal and visual training in face recognition , 1973 .

[32]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context. , 1987 .

[33]  J. Sergent Microgenesis of Face Perception , 1986 .

[34]  M. Courtois,et al.  Processing multiple physical features in facial recognition. , 1979 .

[35]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  On Training People to Recognize Faces , 1979 .

[36]  K. L. Bailis,et al.  Self-reference in facial recognition , 1981 .

[37]  Roy S. Malpass,et al.  Orienting Strategies in Differential Face Recognition , 1985 .

[38]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Depth of processing and anxiety in facial recognition. , 1979, British journal of psychology.

[39]  J. H. Mueller,et al.  Orienting strategies at study and test in facial recognition. , 1980, The American journal of psychology.

[40]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Face recognition memory: The effects of exposure duration and encoding instruction , 1992 .

[41]  D. Perrett,et al.  What Gives a Face its Gender? , 1993, Perception.

[42]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Deep--deeper--deepest? Encoding strategies and the recognition of human faces. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[44]  Relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition. , 1985 .

[45]  N. Kerr,et al.  Effects of contextual elaboration on face recognition , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[46]  G. Wells,et al.  Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[47]  R. Flin,et al.  Development of face recognition: an encoding switch? , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[48]  D. Thomson,et al.  Development of face recognition. , 1995, British journal of psychology.

[49]  Eugene Winograd,et al.  Adult Age Differences in Remembering Faces. , 1978 .

[50]  R. Galper,et al.  Hemispheric Superiority for Recognizing Faces Depends upon How They are Learned , 1980, Cortex.

[51]  Ruth Ellen Proudfoot Hemispheric asymmetry for face recognition: Some effects of visual masking, hemiretinal stimulation and learning task , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  A. Parkin,et al.  Observations on the Efficiency of Two Different Processing Strategies for Remembering Faces , 1981 .

[53]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[54]  B. Clifford,et al.  LEVELS OF PROCESSING AND CAPACITY ALLOCATION , 1980 .

[55]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[56]  Effects of processing strategy and transformation on recognition memory for photographs of faces , 1991 .

[57]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Depth of processing, context, and face recognition. , 1982 .

[58]  H. Ellis,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF THE USE OF THE PHOTO-FIT TECHNIQUE FOR RECALLING FACES* , 1975 .

[59]  D. Neary,et al.  Do amnesics adopt inefficient encoding strategies with faces and random shapes? , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  M. Baenninger The development of face recognition: featural or configurational processing? , 1994, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[61]  K. R. Laughery,et al.  Dynamics of Facial Recall , 1986 .

[62]  S. Penrod,et al.  Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. , 1986 .

[63]  P. Servos,et al.  A clear left hemisphere advantage for visuo-spatially based verbal categorization , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  S Hollander,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[65]  B. Moss,et al.  The Effect of Analytic Versus Holistic Encoding Instructions on Hemispheric Superiority , 1989, Cortex.

[66]  G. Tiberghien Context Effects in Recognition Memory of Faces: Some Theoretical Problems , 1986 .

[67]  Eugene Winograd,et al.  Recognition memory for faces following nine different judgments , 1976 .