Noise cancellation in the electrosensory system of the thornback ray; common mode rejection of input produced by the animal's own ventilatory movement

Summary1.The use of electroreception in feeding depends on the detection of the weak fields of the prey above the interference produced by the predator's own bioelectric fields.2.In this study, the ray's ventilatory movements are shown to produce powerful modulation of electroreceptive afferent input.3.The afferent discharge pattern results mainly from changes of the electric fields within the animal, since it is similar in afferents which innervate ampullary canals of opposite orientation.4.If inputs from canals of opposite orientation are subtracted by the CNS, the sensitivity to external fields is enhanced, and the ventilatory interference removed by common mode rejection.5.Recordings from secondary electrosensory neurons provide evidence that the appropriate inputs exist for common mode rejection, and that ventilation related activity is greatly reduced in these cells and virtually absent in recordings from a mesencephalic electrosensory area.

[1]  A. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Versuche zur biologischen Bedeutung der Lorenzinischen Ampullen bei den Elasmobranchiern , 1966, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie.

[2]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Dogfish horizontal canal system: Responses of primary afferent, vestibular and cerebellar neurons to rotational stimulation , 1980, Neuroscience.

[3]  I. Russell,et al.  The activity of lateral-line efferent neurones in stationary and swimming dogfish. , 1972, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  R. L. Boord,et al.  The Topography of the Superficial Roots and Ganglia of the Anterior Lateral Line Nerve of the Smooth Dogfish, Mustelus canis , 1976, Journal of morphology.

[5]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  The Detection of Electric Fields from Inanimate and Animate Sources Other Than Electric Organs , 1974 .

[6]  R. L. Boord,et al.  Ascending lateral line pathways to the midbrain of the clearnose skate, Raja eglanteria , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  D. McCreery Two types of electroreceptive lateral lemniscal neurons of the lateral line lobe of the catfishIctalurus nebulosus; connections from the lateral line nerve and steady-state frequency response characteristics , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology.

[8]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes. , 1982, Science.

[9]  C. Bell,et al.  Properties of a modifiable efference copy in an electric fish. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. J. A. Buwalda,et al.  Frequency response of the electroreceptors (“small pit organs”) of the catfish,Ictalurus nebulosus LeS , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[11]  G. Akoev,et al.  Physiological properties of electroreceptors of marine skates. , 1976, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. A, Comparative physiology.

[12]  David Bodznick,et al.  Segregation of electro- and mechanoreceptive inputs to the elasmobranch medulla , 1980, Brain Research.

[13]  Anne W. Schmidt,et al.  Somatotopy within the medullary electrosensory nucleus of the little skate, Raja erinacea , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  John C. Montgomery Frequency response characteristics of primary and secondary neurons in the electrosensory system of the thornback ray , 1984 .

[15]  J. Montgomery Origin of the parallel fibers in the cerebellar crest overlying the intermediate nucleus of the elasmobranch hindbrain , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  R. W. Murray,et al.  Receptor mechanisms in the ampullae of Lorenzini of elasmobranch fishes. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.