Macro-, Micro- and Nano-Roughness of Carbon-Based Interface with the Living Cells: Towards a Versatile Bio-Sensing Platform

Integration of living cells with nonbiological surfaces (substrates) of sensors, scaffolds, and implants implies severe restrictions on the interface quality and properties, which broadly cover all elements of the interaction between the living and artificial systems (materials, surface modifications, drug-eluting coatings, etc.). Substrate materials must support cellular viability, preserve sterility, and at the same time allow real-time analysis and control of cellular activity. We have compared new substrates based on graphene and pyrolytic carbon (PyC) for the cultivation of living cells. These are PyC films of nanometer thickness deposited on SiO2 and black silicon and graphene nanowall films composed of graphene flakes oriented perpendicular to the Si substrate. The structure, morphology, and interface properties of these substrates are analyzed in terms of their biocompatibility. The PyC demonstrates interface biocompatibility, promising for controlling cell proliferation and directional intercellular contact formation while as-grown graphene walls possess high hydrophobicity and poor biocompatibility. By performing experiments with C6 glioma cells we discovered that PyC is a cell-friendly coating that can be used without poly-l-lysine or other biopolymers for controlling cell adhesion. Thus, the opportunity to easily control the physical/chemical properties and nanotopography makes the PyC films a perfect candidate for the development of biosensors and 3D bioscaffolds.

[1]  Tommi Kaplas,et al.  Optical Properties of Pyrolytic Carbon Films Versus Graphite and Graphene , 2015, Nanoscale Research Letters.

[2]  Tomi Laurila,et al.  Fabrication of Micro- and Nanopillars from Pyrolytic Carbon and Tetrahedral Amorphous Carbon , 2019, Micromachines.

[3]  Susanna Bosi,et al.  Carbon nanotubes: artificial nanomaterials to engineer single neurons and neuronal networks. , 2012, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[4]  W. Blau,et al.  Synthesis and Analysis of Thin Conducting Pyrolytic Carbon Films , 2012 .

[5]  Mirza Ali Mofazzal Jahromi,et al.  Microfluidic Brain-on-a-Chip: Perspectives for Mimicking Neural System Disorders , 2019, Molecular Neurobiology.

[6]  A Ranella,et al.  Microconical silicon structures influence NGF‐induced PC12 cell morphology , 2015, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[7]  Byung-Soo Kim,et al.  Culture of neural cells and stem cells on graphene , 2013, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.

[8]  Alexander N. Obraztsov,et al.  Electron field emission and structural properties of carbon chemically vapor-deposited films , 1999 .

[9]  Sameer Srivastava,et al.  Functionalized carbon nanotubes as suitable scaffold materials for proliferation and differentiation of canine mesenchymal stem cells , 2017, International journal of nanomedicine.

[10]  Sie Chin Tjong,et al.  Graphene Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Biocompatibility, and Cytotoxicity , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[11]  M. Hassler,et al.  Other commonly used biomedical coatings: pyrolytic carbon coatings , 2012 .

[12]  J. Dai,et al.  Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[13]  M. Kuittinen,et al.  Pyrolytic carbon coated black silicon , 2016, Scientific reports.

[14]  S. Bahrami,et al.  Three-dimensional graphene foam as a conductive scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering , 2019, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[15]  Padma Gopalan,et al.  Surface functionalization and dynamics of polymeric cell culture substrates. , 2016, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[16]  T. Kaplas,et al.  Direct deposition of semitransparent conducting pyrolytic carbon films , 2012 .

[17]  Alexander N. Obraztsov,et al.  Surface structure and field emission properties of few‐layer graphene flakes , 2011 .

[18]  Loredana Zollo,et al.  Invasive Intraneural Interfaces: Foreign Body Reaction Issues , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[19]  Sergey Rodin,et al.  Physical, Spatial, and Molecular Aspects of Extracellular Matrix of In Vivo Niches and Artificial Scaffolds Relevant to Stem Cells Research , 2015, Stem cells international.

[20]  Xin Zhao,et al.  Graphene-Based Nanocomposites for Neural Tissue Engineering , 2019, Molecules.

[21]  M Cristina L Martins,et al.  Covalent immobilization of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) onto biomaterial surfaces. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[22]  R. Waugh,et al.  Neutrophil adhesive contact dependence on impingement force. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Alexander N. Obraztsov,et al.  Electrochemical characterization of mesoporous nanographite films , 2016 .

[24]  Mohanan,et al.  Comprehensive Application of Graphene: Emphasis on Biomedical Concerns , 2019, Nano-Micro Letters.

[25]  Aijun Li,et al.  Thermal expansion of pyrolytic carbon with various textures , 2013 .

[26]  Jung-Taek Lim,et al.  Effect of graphene oxide ratio on the cell adhesion and growth behavior on a graphene oxide-coated silicon substrate , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[27]  Biman Bagchi,et al.  Study of distance dependence of hydrophobic force between two graphene-like walls and a signature of pressure induced structure formation in the confined water. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[28]  Guang-Zhen Jin,et al.  Neurite outgrowth of dorsal root ganglia neurons is enhanced on aligned nanofibrous biopolymer scaffold with carbon nanotube coating , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  Shan Bian,et al.  Cell Adhesion Molecules in Neural Stem Cell and Stem Cell- Based Therapy for Neural Disorders , 2013 .

[30]  M. Hori,et al.  Graphene Nanowalls , 2013 .

[31]  A. Abdelghani,et al.  Graphene nanomaterials as biocompatible and conductive scaffolds for stem cells: impact for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine , 2015, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[32]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[33]  Ting Xie,et al.  Adhesion in the stem cell niche: biological roles and regulation , 2013, Development.

[34]  Polina Kuzhir,et al.  Enhanced microwave shielding effectiveness of ultrathin pyrolytic carbon films , 2013 .

[35]  Yuri Svirko,et al.  Study of nanometric thin pyrolytic carbon films for explosive electron emission cathode in high-voltage planar diode , 2015 .

[36]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Graphene as a Prototypical Model for Two-Dimensional Continuous Mechanics , 2017 .

[37]  Ville Jokinen,et al.  Non‐Reflecting Silicon and Polymer Surfaces by Plasma Etching and Replication , 2011, Advanced materials.

[38]  Ashutosh Sharma,et al.  Carbon microelectromechanical systems as a substratum for cell growth , 2008, Biomedical materials.

[39]  J. Fehr,et al.  Role of cell surface contact in the kinetics of superoxide production by granulocytes. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[40]  Walter M. Weber,et al.  An investigation of the electrical properties of pyrolytic carbon in reduced dimensions: Vias and wires , 2010 .

[41]  S D Cook,et al.  Long-term follow-up of pyrolytic carbon metacarpophalangeal implants. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[42]  G Rh Owen,et al.  Focal adhesion quantification - a new assay of material biocompatibility? Review. , 2005, European cells & materials.