Measurement of strain rate sensitivity of aluminium foams for energy dissipation

Abstract In this paper the structural performance of aluminium alloy foams have been investigated under both static and dynamic compression loads. Three foam typologies (M-PORE, CYMAT, SCHUNK) in a wide range of density (from 0.14 to 0.75 g/cm 3 ), made by means of different process-routes (melt gas injection, powder metallurgy, investment casting) have been analysed. Foams microstructural characterization has been carried out through morphometric measurements by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Computed Tomography (CT) and subsequent digital image processing in order to determine average cells size and cell distributions on different section planes. The experimental study aims to assess the strain rate sensitivity and energy absorption capability of commercially available metal foams and to point out the correlation between the mechanical behaviour and the physical and geometrical properties of the foam. It has been found that the specific energy dissipation of foams with similar density can be quite different: for the same volume of foam, average values of 1770, 1780 and 5590 J/kg at 50% nominal compression have been measured on M-PORE (0.19 g/cm 3 ), CYMAT (0.28 g/cm 3 ) and SCHUNK (0.28 g/cm 3 ) foams, respectively. Impact tests showed that the dependence of the plateau stress on strain rate could be considered negligible for M-PORE and CYMAT foams while it is quite remarkable for SCHUNK foams. Moreover, it was found that the peak stress of CYMAT foams has a quite large sensitivity on the loading rate.

[1]  Hilary Bart-Smith,et al.  On the mechanical performance of closed cell Al alloy foams , 1997 .

[2]  Mustafa Güden,et al.  Crushing of aluminum closed cell foams: density and strain rate effects , 2000 .

[3]  M. Ashby,et al.  Sandwich Panel Design Using Aluminum Alloy Foam , 2000 .

[4]  James Lankford,et al.  High strain rate compression of closed-cell aluminium foams , 2000 .

[5]  M. Ashby,et al.  Metal Foams: A Design Guide , 2000 .

[6]  T. Lu,et al.  Characterization of close-celled cellular aluminum alloys , 2001 .

[7]  L. Gibson,et al.  The effects of cell face curvature and corrugations on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams , 1998 .

[8]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Effects of solid distribution on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams , 1998 .

[9]  G. Belingardi,et al.  Characterization of polymeric structural foams under compressive impact loading by means of energy-absorption diagram , 2001 .

[10]  Mamoru Mabuchi,et al.  Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading , 1999 .

[11]  H. Fusheng,et al.  The mechanical behavior of foamed aluminum , 1999 .

[12]  U. Ramamurty,et al.  Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam , 2000 .

[13]  L. Gibson,et al.  Size effects in ductile cellular solids. Part II : experimental results , 2001 .

[14]  Jeffrey Wadsworth,et al.  Effect of cell morphology on the compressive properties of open-cell aluminum foams , 2000 .

[15]  Hilary Bart-Smith,et al.  Compressive deformation and yielding mechanisms in cellular Al alloys determined using X-ray tomography and surface strain mapping , 1998 .

[16]  J. Grenestedt,et al.  Influence of cell wall thickness variations on elastic stiffness of closed-cell cellular solids , 2000 .

[17]  A. Mortensen,et al.  Deformation of open-cell aluminum foam , 2001 .

[18]  N. Fleck,et al.  High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminium alloy foams , 2000 .

[19]  M. Ashby,et al.  Uniaxial stress–strain behaviour of aluminium alloy foams , 1999 .