The Development of a Lifelike Breast Cancer Patient Simulator using Anthropometric Data

Background: Early detection significantly reduces breast cancer mortality. Yet, many medical students and doctors report they could improve their skills in clinical breast examination (CBE). Training programs using silicone breast simulators improve the lump detection rate. Despite this, medical students and trainees typically perform low in breast examination scores. This indicates current simulation models provide insufficient CBE training. In this study, we have improved breast examination simulators by applying anthropometric data and selecting one very commonly occurring shape in the female population as a model. Aims: To provide a breast model representative of the large size female population and more varied scenarios for breast lump palpation. Method: Comparing the 2002 National Size and Shape Survey of 1,250 adult Australian women, Australian Bureau of Statistics data, and the Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource Project (CAESAR®), we selected individuals anthropometrically representative of the surveyed population. Combining one woman’s body scan, computer-aided design, rapid prototype techniques, and the latest biofidelic (lifelike) silicone technology we created an anatomically correct representation of a real world patient. This model requires trainees to learn that breast examination can be complex and involves a multifaceted approach. Results: A prototype representing women with larger breast size and a relatively high body mass index (BMI) was developed. The individual selected was a large size woman of approximate BMI 30, 82kg and large cup size (D); by our analysis more than 50% of women are C cup or above. Conclusions: Confident and competent breast palpation requires a life-size model that looks and feels lifelike. Currently available breast examination simulators do not model the size and shape of patients encountered. This impedes developing confidence and competence in health care workers who need these skills. Lifelike look and feel require an anatomically correct, multi-layered soft breast construction, incorporating palpable anatomical underlying features, including tumors.

[1]  Matthew Wright,et al.  Graphical analysis of bra size calculation procedures , 2002 .

[2]  J. Huxley,et al.  Terminology of Relative Growth , 1936, Nature.

[3]  Emily White,et al.  Predictors of Sensitivity of Clinical Breast Examination (CBE) , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  D. Lane,et al.  Breast cancer screening knowledge and skills of students upon entering and exiting a medical school , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  L. Irwig,et al.  Evidence relevant to the investigation of breast symptoms: the triple test. , 2002, Breast.

[6]  Kamran Z Khan,et al.  Simulation in Medical Education , 2018, Understanding Medical Education.

[7]  S. Fletcher,et al.  How do women compare with internal medicine residents in breast lump detection? , 1989, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[8]  D. Austin,et al.  Detection and Description of Small Breast Masses by Residents Trained Using a Standardized Clinical Breast Exam Curriculum , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  J. Thistlethwaite,et al.  Clinical breast examination for asymptomatic women , 2007 .

[10]  J M Wiecha,et al.  Provider confidence in breast examination. , 1993, Family practice research journal.

[11]  Russell Harris,et al.  Does This Patient Have Breast Cancer? The Screening Clinical Breast Examination: Should It Be Done? How? , 2000 .

[12]  P. Franks,et al.  Rectal examination in general practice. , 1990, BMJ.

[13]  H S Pennypacker,et al.  Why can't we do better breast examinations? , 1999, Nurse practitioner forum.

[14]  Lump detection is enhanced in silicone breast models simulating postmenopausal breast tissue , 1996, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[15]  K. Fontaine,et al.  Access and use of medical care among obese persons. , 2000, Obesity research.

[16]  Ali Montazeri,et al.  Weight, height, body mass index and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a case-control study , 2008, BMC Cancer.

[17]  G. Dunnington,et al.  Clinical breast evaluation skills of house officers and students. , 1996, The American surgeon.

[18]  D. Saslow,et al.  Performance and Reporting of Clinical Breast Examination: A Review of the Literature , 2004, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[19]  Daniel Kopans,et al.  Clinical Breast Examination: Practical Recommendations for Optimizing Performance and Reporting , 2004, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[20]  A. Magarey,et al.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in Australian children and adolescents: reassessment of 1985 and 1995 data against new standard international definitions , 2001, The Medical journal of Australia.

[21]  K. McTigue,et al.  Reexamining the physical examination for obese patients. , 2011, JAMA.

[22]  B. Crabtree,et al.  Family Physicians' Barriers to Cancer Screening in Extremely Obese Patients , 2010, Obesity.

[23]  C. Lehman,et al.  Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  Jessica M. De Leon,et al.  Effect of clinical breast examination training on practitioner's perceived competence. , 2002, Cancer detection and prevention.