Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility

In the face of marketplace polls that attest to the increasing influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on consumers' purchase behavior, this article examines when, how, and for whom specific CSR initiatives work. The findings implicate both company-specific factors, such as the CSR issues a company chooses to focus on and the quality of its products, and individual-specific factors, such as consumers' personal support for the CSR issues and their general beliefs about CSR, as key moderators of consumers' responses to CSR. The results also highlight the mediating role of consumers' perceptions of congruence between their own characters and that of the company in their reactions to its CSR initiatives. More specifically, the authors find that CSR initiatives can, under certain conditions, decrease consumers' intentions to buy a company's products.

[1]  Michael Hopkins,et al.  The planetary bargain , 2003 .

[2]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[3]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix? , 2000 .

[4]  S. Fournier,et al.  Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research , 1998 .

[5]  Stuart L. Esrock,et al.  Social responsibility and corporate web pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? , 1998 .

[6]  John McGee,et al.  Commentary on ‘corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework’ by A. M. Rugman and A. Verbeke , 1998 .

[7]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework , 1998 .

[8]  Sarah D. Stanwick,et al.  The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[9]  Diederik A. Stapel,et al.  Assimilation or Contrast?: Comparison Relevance, Distinctness, and the Impact of Accessible Information on Consumer Judgments , 1998 .

[10]  Elizabeth H. Creyer,et al.  The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics? , 1997 .

[11]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[12]  D. Turban,et al.  Corporate Social Performance And Organizational Attractiveness To Prospective Employees , 1997 .

[13]  K. B. Murray,et al.  Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts , 1997 .

[14]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses , 1997 .

[15]  Minette E. Drumwright,et al.  Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria , 1996 .

[16]  Eric Haley,et al.  Exploring the Construct of Organization as Source: Consumers' Understandings of Organizational Sponsorship of Advocacy Advertising , 1996 .

[17]  Amy L. Kristof.  PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[18]  M. Pava,et al.  The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost , 1996 .

[19]  Robert E. Kleine,et al.  How Is a Possession “Me” or “Not Me”? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment , 1995 .

[20]  M. Drumwright.  Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion , 1994 .

[21]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[22]  Craig Smith.  The new corporate philanthropy , 1994 .

[23]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[24]  T. Chappell.  The Soul of a Business: Managing for Profit and the Common Good , 1993 .

[25]  R. Scherer,et al.  Social Responsibility and Market Share , 1993 .

[26]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification , 1992 .

[27]  A. Hiatt.  Building corporate character. Interview by Nan Stone. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[28]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions , 1992 .

[29]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[30]  A. Carroll.  The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[31]  G. Fryxell,et al.  Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance: An empirical examination , 1991 .

[32]  S. Bedekar.  Marketing : concepts and strategies , 1991 .

[33]  P. Kotler,et al.  A framework for marketing image management. , 1991, Sloan management review.

[34]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[35]  Kenneth E. Aupperle,et al.  An expanded investigation into the relationship of corporate social responsibility and financial performance , 1989 .

[36]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis , 1989 .

[37]  P. Herr.  Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects , 1989 .

[38]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Assessing the Role of Brand-Related Cognitive Responses as Mediators of Communication Effects on Cognitive Structure , 1989 .

[39]  O. Ferrell,et al.  Marketing Concepts and Strategies , 1989 .

[40]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[41]  J. McGuire,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance , 1988 .

[42]  R. Belk.  Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[43]  Anil Menon,et al.  Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy , 1988 .

[44]  L. Cronbach.  Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed , 1987 .

[45]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[46]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  Prototype matching: a strategy for social decision making. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Martin Freedman,et al.  Pollution disclosures, pollution performance and economic performance , 1982 .

[49]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[50]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The processing of social stimulus information: A conceptual integration , 1980 .

[51]  Thomas J. Zenisek.  Corporate Social Responsibility: A Conceptualization Based On Organizational Literature , 1979 .

[52]  Keith Davis,et al.  Business and society: environment and responsibility , 1975 .

[53]  Jacob Beck,et al.  Adaptation-level theory. , 1974 .

[54]  H. Helson,et al.  Adaptation-level theory , 1964 .

[55]  N. Maccoby,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. Muzafer Sherif , Carl I. Hovland , 1962 .