Optimal Dynamic Line Rating Forecasts Selection Based on Ampacity Probabilistic Forecasting and Network Operators’ Risk Aversion

Real-time current-carrying capacity of overhead conductors is extremely variable due to its dependence on weather conditions, resulting in the use of traditionally conservative static ratings. This paper proposes a methodology for exploiting the latent current-carrying capacity of overhead transmission lines taking into account line ampacity forecasts, power flow simulations, and the network operator's risk aversion. The procedure can be described as follows: First, probabilistic forecasts for the current rating of transmission lines are generated, paying particular attention to the reliability of the lower part of the distribution. Second, a cost benefit analysis is carried out by solving a bilevel stochastic problem that takes into account the reduction in generation costs, resulting from a higher power transfer capacity and the increased use of reserves caused by forecast errors. The risk appetite of the network operator is considered in order to accept or penalize high-risk situations, depending on whether the network operator can be described as risk neutral or risk averse.

[1]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Impact of dynamic line rating with forecast error on the scheduling of reserve service , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[2]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Probabilistic N−1 security assessment incorporating dynamic line ratings , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[3]  S. Iwamoto,et al.  Application of dynamic rating to evaluation of ATC with thermal constraints considering weather conditions , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[4]  Andrew M. Knight,et al.  Applicability of Dynamic Thermal Line Rating for Long Lines , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[5]  Jean-Louis Lilien,et al.  Operational experience with Dynamic Line Rating forecast-based solutions to increase usable network transfer capacity , 2014 .

[6]  Jana Heckenbergerova,et al.  Electric power system cost/loss optimization using Dynamic Thermal Rating and linear programming , 2010, 2010 IEEE Electrical Power & Energy Conference.

[7]  Jasper Snoek,et al.  Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms , 2012, NIPS.

[8]  Dilan Jayaweera,et al.  Optimal scheduling with dynamic line ratings and intermittent wind power , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[9]  Jean-Louis Lilien,et al.  Dynamic line rating and ampacity forecasting as the keys to optimise power line assets with the integration of res. The European project Twenties Demonstration inside Central Western Europe , 2013 .

[10]  Andrea Michiorri,et al.  DYNAMIC LINE RATING DAY-AHEAD FORECASTS-COST BENEFIT BASED SELECTION OF THE OPTIMAL QUANTILE , 2016 .

[11]  Lennart Söder,et al.  Impact From Dynamic Line Rating on Wind Power Integration , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  David M. Greenwood,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Real-Time Thermal Ratings on Power Network Reliability , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Nicolai Meinshausen,et al.  Quantile Regression Forests , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[14]  Konstantinos Kopsidas,et al.  Optimal Demand Response Scheduling With Real-Time Thermal Ratings of Overhead Lines for Improved Network Reliability , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[15]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[16]  Jianxue Wang,et al.  GEFCom2014 probabilistic solar power forecasting based on k-nearest neighbor and kernel density estimator , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[17]  Andrea Michiorri,et al.  Forecasting for dynamic line rating , 2015 .

[18]  Albert Moser,et al.  Probabilistic ampacity forecasting for overhead lines using weather forecast ensembles , 2013 .

[19]  B. Banerjee,et al.  Alleviating post-contingency congestion risk of wind integrated systems with dynamic line ratings , 2014, 2014 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC).

[20]  Peter B. Luh,et al.  Probabilistic forecasting of dynamic line rating for over-head transmission lines , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[21]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[22]  Nils Siebert,et al.  Dynamic Line Rating Using Numerical Weather Predictions and Machine Learning: A Case Study , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[23]  I. Albizu,et al.  Overhead line rating forecasting for the integration of wind power in electricity markets , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP).

[24]  M.W. Davis,et al.  A new thermal rating approach: The real time thermal rating system for strategic overhead conductor transmission lines -- Part I: General description and justification of the real time thermal rating system , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[25]  Dilan Jayaweera,et al.  Monte Carlo based method for managing risk of scheduling decisions with dynamic line ratings , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[26]  Tie-Yan Liu,et al.  LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree , 2017, NIPS.

[27]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Understanding the Benefits of Dynamic Line Rating Under Multiple Sources of Uncertainty , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Robust Corrective Control Measures in Power Systems With Dynamic Line Rating , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.