Ca2+ channel dynamics explain the nonlinear neuroplasticity induction by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex

[1]  M. Bennett,et al.  The concept of long term potentiation of transmission at synapses , 2000, Progress in Neurobiology.

[2]  D. McCormick,et al.  Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[3]  Leigh E. Charvet,et al.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016 , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[4]  M. Wischnewski,et al.  Motor cortex plasticity induced by beta transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2019, Brain Stimulation.

[5]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Different forms of synaptic plasticity in somatosensory and motor areas of the neocortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[7]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. , 1962, Experimental neurology.

[8]  L. Parra,et al.  Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  C. A. Terzuolo,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF IMPOSED VOLTAGE GRADIENT ADEQUATE TO MODULATE NEURONAL FIRING. , 1956, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  D. Feldman.  Synaptic mechanisms for plasticity in neocortex. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  M. Bear,et al.  LTP and LTD An Embarrassment of Riches , 2004, Neuron.

[12]  M. W. Brown,et al.  An experimental test of the role of postsynaptic calcium levels in determining synaptic strength using perirhinal cortex of rat , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  A. Keller,et al.  Mechanisms of LTP induction in rat motor cortex in vitro. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Induction of Late LTP-Like Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex by Repeated Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[16]  M. M. Samani,et al.  Probing the relevance of repeated cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex for prolongation of after‐effects , 2019, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Induction of long-term potentiation-like plasticity in the primary motor cortex with repeated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation – Better effects with intensified protocols? , 2020, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  T. Perneger.  What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments , 1998, BMJ.

[19]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Zucker,et al.  Selective induction of LTP and LTD by postsynaptic [Ca2+]i elevation. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  L. Bindman,et al.  Long-lasting Changes in the Level of the Electrical Activity of the Cerebral Cortex produced by Polarizing Currents , 1962, Nature.

[23]  James S Trimmer,et al.  Regulation of ion channel localization and phosphorylation by neuronal activity , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Takuya Sasaki,et al.  The intensity of continuous theta burst stimulation, but not the waveform used to elicit motor evoked potentials, influences its outcome in the human motor cortex , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[26]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Consolidation of Human Motor Cortical Neuroplasticity by D-Cycloserine , 2004, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[27]  J. Jefferys,et al.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  H. Hirase,et al.  Calcium imaging reveals glial involvement in transcranial direct current stimulation-induced plasticity in mouse brain , 2016, Nature Communications.

[29]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. , 2000, Science.

[30]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Strengthening of horizontal cortical connections following skill learning , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  R. N. Brogden,et al.  Flunarizine , 2012, Drugs.

[32]  D. Liebetanz,et al.  Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  G. Egan,et al.  The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[34]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Can electric fields explain inter-individual variability in transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex? , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[35]  P. Matthews,et al.  Polarity-Sensitive Modulation of Cortical Neurotransmitters by Transcranial Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Nonlinear effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex with different stimulation intensity and duration , 2018 .

[37]  Yasuo Hori,et al.  Increase in the calcium level following anodal polarization in the rat brain , 1995, Brain Research.

[38]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  Michael C. Ridding,et al.  Low-intensity, short-interval theta burst stimulation modulates excitatory but not inhibitory motor networks , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[42]  Semiha Aydin,et al.  Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation? , 2019, Brain Stimulation.

[43]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  J. Lisman,et al.  A mechanism for the Hebb and the anti-Hebb processes underlying learning and memory. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[46]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  A. Antal,et al.  Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[48]  V. Clark,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces localized and specific alterations in neurochemistry: A 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy study , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[49]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[50]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation changes resting state functional connectivity: A large-scale brain network modeling study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[51]  J E Lisman,et al.  Three Ca2+ levels affect plasticity differently: the LTP zone, the LTD zone and no man's land , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[52]  L. Bindman,et al.  The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effects , 1964, The Journal of physiology.